CMS Offers Great News With Fee Schedule Changes

Boost co-surgery, multiple surgery, and bilateral surgery pay for these select procedures

You’ll no longer have to eat the cost of your services if your physician acts as co-surgeon on spine revisions. Thanks to several Fee Schedule changes that CMS recently enacted. CMS had good news in MLN Matters article MM7430, which had an effective date of Jan. 1, 2011 and an implementation date of July 5, 2011.

Look for Potential Co-Surgery Payment for These Codes:

CMS will change the co-surgery indicator for spine revision codes 22212 and 22222 from “0” to “1”. Keep in mind that supporting documentation is required when billing for a co-surgeon with these procedures, so don’t forget to submit that with your claim or you’ll be looking at bad news.

Remember: If you’re billing for co-surgery, append modifier 62 (Two surgeons) to your procedure code. For modifier 62 claims, most payers pay an additional fee (generally 125 percent of the “usual” fee for the procedure, split evenly between the two surgeons). Avoid reimbursement problems by checking these claims carefully. To claim co-surgeons, each surgeon must perform a distinct portion of a single CPT procedure, and each surgeon must dictate and submit his own operative report for his portion of the surgery.

Benefit From Surgical Assist Changes:

Practices that perform sinus endoscopies will also get a potential boost from the fee schedule changes, now that you’ll see the assistant at surgery indicator change for codes 31233 and 31235 from “1” (Assistant at surgery may not be paid) to “0” (Payment restrictions for assistants at surgery applies to this procedure unless supporting documentation is submitted to establish medical necessity).

You’ll append modifier 80 to the assistant’s surgical codes if the assisting surgeon is a physician. In cases when a non-physician assists at surgery on Medicare patients, append...

Comments Off on CMS Offers Great News With Fee Schedule Changes

History of Present Illness Must Be Taken by MD, NPP

Don’t let nurses do the doctor’s work, or risk downcoded E/Ms upon audit.

The only parts of the E/M visit that an RN can document independently are the Review of Systems (ROS), Past, Family, and Social History (PFSH) and Vital Signs, according to a June 4, 2010 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) answer from Palmetto GBA, Part B carrier for Ohio. The physician or mid-level provider must review those three areas and write a statement that the documentation is correct or add to it.

Only the physician or non-physician practitioner who conducts the E/M service can perform the History of Present Illness (HPI),  Palmetto says.

Exception: In some cases, an office or Emergency Department triage nurse can document “pertinent information” regarding the Chief Complaint or HPI, Palmetto says. But you should treat those notes as “preliminary information.” The doctor providing the E/M service must “document that he or she explored the HPI in more detail,” Palmetto explains.

Other payers have expanded on Palmetto’s announcement, letting physicians know that they cannot simply initial the nurse’s documentation. For example, Noridian Medicare publishes a policy that states, “Reviewing information obtained by ancillary staff and writing a declarative sentence does not suffice for the history of present illness (HPI). An example of unacceptable HPI documentation would be ‘I have reviewed the HPI and agree with above.’”

Good news: Thanks to this clarification, your doctor won’t have to repeat the triage nurse’s work. Right now, if the nurse writes “knee pain x 4 days,” at the top of the note, some auditors might insist that your doctor needs to write “knee pain x 4 days” in his/her own handwriting underneath. But that requirement is a thing of the past if your carrier echoes Palmetto’s requirement.

Bad news: Now this carrier has made it...

Comments Off on History of Present Illness Must Be Taken by MD, NPP

CMS Changes Conversion Factor Yet Again

Plus: Look for an increase in your DEXA scan reimbursement.

The bad news: Your carrier won’t be paying your claims using the conversion factor of $36.0846 anymore.

The good news: CMS is only changing the conversion factor by less than a penny, making it $36.0791, according to CMS Transmittal 700, issued on May 10. MACs will use this 2010 conversion factor to calculate your payments, but keep in mind that after May 31, you’re still due to face a 21 percent pay cut unless Congress intervenes. Keep an eye on the Insider for more information on whether Congress steps in...

Comments Off on CMS Changes Conversion Factor Yet Again

Urology Reimbursement: Coding for MESA, TESA

Question: Could you please give me the most current coding guidelines for the MESA and TESA procedures? The last I was aware, we were to use unlisted procedure codes. Is that still correct? Answer: You should still use unlisted procedure codes to report microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) and testicular sperm aspiration (TESA, sometimes called TESE [...] Related articles:

  1. Urology Coding Challenge: Gold Seed Marker Placement Plus TRUS Question: How should I report the placement of gold...
  2. Urology CPT 2010: 3 New Codes, 2 Deletions Change Your Urodynamics CodingUrodynamics income will go down by half, experts calculate. You will...
  3. Wake Up Your Reimbursement By Capturing Sedation Pay Reporting CS with a ‘targeted’ service puts a denial...

Comments Off on Urology Reimbursement: Coding for MESA, TESA

CCI 16.0: Now Allows a Modifier to Separate Hundreds of Edits

But other new bundles that 16.0 has in store might put a dent in your reimbursement. You may still be poring through your 2010 CPT manual, but the new edition of CCI, effective Jan. 1, is already looking to make some code pairings impossible. The Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) released version 16.0 earlier this week, revealing 24,060 [...] Related articles:

  1. CCI 15.1: Adhere to These Osteotomy, Laminectomy Edits You’ll need a modifier on this code pair to...
  2. CCI 15.2 Retracts Neurostimulator Edits from 15.1Look for new edits that affect eye exam codes, anesthesia,...
  3. CCI 15.3 Update: You Can Resubmit Dozens of Previously-Bundled 22526 ClaimsNewsflash: CCI 15.3 retroactively deletes hundreds of edit pairs, but...

Comments Off on CCI 16.0: Now Allows a Modifier to Separate Hundreds of Edits

Facet Joint Injection Coding for 2010

Marvel Hammer’s Quick Start Guide to changes you’ll face in 2010. Tons of pain management coders gathered at the Orlando conference this week, and everyone was abuzz about the coding changes the painful reimbursement cuts their practices are going to get next year. Some big news: Effective January 1, 2010 radiological imaging will be required and bundled [...] Related articles:

  1. MAC Auditors Will Stick It To Facet Joint Injection Claims We hook you up with CMS instructions for when...
  2. Pain Management Coding Update: Facet Joint Injection CPT Changes for 2010Pain management, anesthesia, orthopedic, physiatry & neurology coders get ready...
  3. Audit Hot Spot: Facet Joint Injection ClaimsHere’s why the OIG wants to stick it to facet...

Comments Off on Facet Joint Injection Coding for 2010