Follow 4 Simple Tips for Modifier 62 to Get your Game Plan in place for both Codes and Documentation

When two surgeons work together to perform one procedure, each physician’s individual documentation requirements can get jumbled up.  Make sure your physician isn’t passing the documentation buck and that he or she knows to follow these four tips when you submit claims with modifier 62.

Tip 1: Each physician should identify the other as a co-surgeon. Also make sure that the other physician is billing with modifier 62. A lot of confusion can arise when physicians from different practices are reporting the same procedure.

You may find yourself in a situation where one physician may report the other physician’s work as that of an assistant surgeon, in which case the claims would not correspond. This means a denial will hit your desk. One surgeon cannot simply indicate the other as the co-surgeon. Both physicians must submit claims for the same procedure, both with modifier 62. To accomplish this all you only need to call with a simple courtesy to the other physician’s billing or coding department.

Tip 2: Each physician should document her own operative notes. When surgeons are acting as “co-surgeons,” it is implied that they are each performing a distinct part of the procedure, which means they can’t “share” the same documentation. Each physician should provide a note detailing what portion of the procedure he or she performed, how much work was involved, and how long the procedure took. Including a brief explanation of the need for co-surgeons will help to avoid denials and reimbursement delays.

Tip 3: Each physician must link the same diagnosis code to the common procedure code. Though this requirement may seem obvious, if two physicians serve as co-surgeons to perform one procedure, the diagnosis code(s) they link to the CPT® code should be the same.  Before submitting a claim with modifier 62, someone...

Comments Off on Follow 4 Simple Tips for Modifier 62 to Get your Game Plan in place for both Codes and Documentation

Follow 4 Simple Tips for Modifier 62 to Get your Game Plan in place for both Codes and Documentation

When two surgeons work together to perform one procedure, each physician’s individual documentation requirements can get jumbled up. Make sure your physician isn’t passing the documentation buck and that he or she knows to follow these four tips when you submit claims with modifier 62.

Tip 1: Each physician should identify the other as a co-surgeon.  Also make sure that the other physician is billing with modifier 62. A lot of confusion can arise when physicians from different practices are reporting the same procedure.

You may find yourself in a situation where one physician may report the other physician’s work as that of an assistant surgeon, in which case the claims would not correspond. This means a denial will hit your desk. One surgeon cannot simply indicate the other as the co-surgeon.  Both physicians must submit claims for the same procedure, both with modifier 62. To accomplish this all you only need to call with a simple courtesy to the other physician’s billing or coding department.

Tip 2: Each physician should document her own operative notes. When surgeons are acting as “co-surgeons,” it is implied that they are each performing a distinct part of the procedure, which means they can’t “share” the same documentation. Each physician should provide a note detailing what portion of the procedure he or she performed, how much work was involved, and how long the procedure took. Including a brief explanation of the need for co-surgeons will help to avoid denials and reimbursement delays.

Tip 3: Each physician must link the same diagnosis code to the common procedure code. Though this requirement may seem obvious, if two physicians serve as co-surgeons to perform one procedure, the diagnosis code(s) they link to the CPT® code should be the same.  Before submitting a claim with modifier 62, someone...

Comments Off on Follow 4 Simple Tips for Modifier 62 to Get your Game Plan in place for both Codes and Documentation

Inhaler Education Claims: 4 Quick Guidelines to Help You Report Correct Claims

When reporting inhaler service, you should remember the type of device the provider is using, but shouldn’t stop with just that. Documentation requirements and qualifying modifiers are just as important when coding for inhaler services.

When you’re confused why some payers would deny reimbursement for certain inhaler claims, the following ideas could guide you to a better understanding of how inhaler service codes work out.

94664 Is Your Ticket to Diskus Demo Pay

The Advair Diskus is an “aerosol generator.” If the nurse/medical assistant taught someone to use an Advair Diskus — or any other diskus — you should report 94664 (Demonstration and/or evaluation of patient utilization of an aerosol generator, nebulizer, metered dose inhaler or IPPB device).

For example, a pulmonologist starts a patient with asthma (493.00, Extrinsic asthma; unspecified or 493.20, Chronic obstructive asthma; unspecified) on Advair. A nurse then teaches the patient how to use the Diskus. As per CPT guidelines, you should report 99201-99215 for the office visit and 94664 without a modifier, says Alan L. Plummer, MD, professor of medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta.

In addition, CMS transmittal R954CP also indicates that modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable E/M service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) applies only to E/M services performed with procedures that carry a global fee, which 94664 does not have.

Nonetheless, many payers will only pay for the service if you append modifier 25 to the visit code. It’s always best to check with your major insurers’ policy first.

Bundle Dose in Teaching Session

The patient may administer medication dose during the teaching session. Both services (treatment + teaching) are bundled into one CPT: 94640 (Pressurized or nonpressurized inhalation treatment for acute...

Comments Off on Inhaler Education Claims: 4 Quick Guidelines to Help You Report Correct Claims

4 Tips Help You Ensure Inhaler Service Success

Often a nurse or medical assistant helps a patient with an inhaler demo or evaluation, but whenever coding it, you must keep these three areas in mind: the type of device used, documentation requirements, and qualifying modifiers. Follow these four tips from our experts to understand why some payers might deny payment for the service — and what you can do to win deserved dollars.

1. Categorize the Diskus Correctly

Many physician offices use the Advair Diskus for their patients, which is an aerosol generator. “An aerosol generator is a device that produces airborne suspensions of small particles for inhalation therapy,” explains Peter Koukounas, owner of Hippocratic Solutions medical billing service in Fairfield, N.J. If the nurse or medical assistant taught someone to use an Advair Diskus — or any other diskus — you should report 94664 (Demonstration and/or evaluation of patient utilization of an aerosol generator, nebulizer, metered dose inhaler or IPPB device).

The physician starts a patient with asthma (493.00, Extrinsic asthma; unspecified or 493.20, Chronic obstructive asthma; unspecified) on Advair. A nurse then teaches the patient how to use the Diskus. According to CPT guidelines, you should report 99201-99215 for the office visit (depending on whether you’re treating a new or established patient). Then report 94664, but don’t append a modifier, says Alan L. Plummer, MD, professor of medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta.

CMS transmittal R954CP indicates that modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable E/M service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) applies only to E/M services performed with procedures that have a global fee period. Code 94664 does not have a global fee period, which is why you don’t automatically include modifier 25.

Despite what CMS guidelines might...

Comments Off on 4 Tips Help You Ensure Inhaler Service Success

HHA Referral: More Documentation Requirements Add to Physician Burden

Agencies will have little control over new physician-related payment condition. Home health agencies are hoping for some big changes to one troublesome provision in the 2011 proposed payment rule – the face-to-face physician encounter requirement.

The mandate for the face-to-face encounter was in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act health care reform law enacted earlier this year. But the CMS version of the requirement is even stricter than the law requires.

Example: The proposed rule also requires that the encounter be for the primary reason home care services are required and that physicians furnish “unprecedented” physician documentation about the encounter and why the patient meets homebound criteria. “We believe that CMS has gone beyond statutory intent” in those two provisions, says the National Association for Home Care & Hospice.

The proposed face-to-face encounter requirement is riddled with problems for HHAs, industry experts say. To begin with, agencies have little influence over whether their patients make it to the doctor for a visit.

“It is absolutely ridiculous to place a requirement on home health providers for which they have absolutely no control,” protests consultant Pam Warmack with Clinic Connections in Ruston, La. “How in the world is the staff of the home health provider supposed to ensure that the patient visits the physician and that the physician documents appropriately in his/her office records?” Warmack asks.

“We can make appointments for patients, but we can’t ensure they keep them, that their transportation is reliable, that they feel well enough to make the trip, etc.,” Warmack continues. “There are so, so many reasons that patients fail to see the physician despite the best efforts of the home care staff to make it happen.”

The requirement will be “a particular burden on home health patients who are homebound and have difficulty leaving home,” notes...

Comments Off on HHA Referral: More Documentation Requirements Add to Physician Burden

Podiatry Coding Clinic: G0245 and G0246

Here’s when you may need to get an ABN Medicare policies covering routine foot care for diabetic patients suffering from peripheral neuropathy with loss of protective sensation (LOPS) have been in force since 2002. Yet many still find the related G codes confusing. Today, let’s nail down the what documentation should be in the podiatrist’s note [...] Related articles:

  1. Podiatry Coding Education: 28293 For Joint Replacement for Hallux LimitusQuestion: Our podiatrist performed a joint replacement for hallux limitus and...
  2. Charcot Foot Coding: When To Boot 250.00 Boot 250.00 for Charcot Foot, Embrace Dual Dxs Stop...
  3. Diabetes Coding Blunders That Cause Denials Do you know the 5 fourth digits for 250.xx...

Comments Off on Podiatry Coding Clinic: G0245 and G0246