New AWV Codes: Here’s What the MACs Are Saying

Stop worrying if your claims were denied, you still hold a chance as many carriers are reprocessing.

Almost a year ago, practices were told that Medicare will cover an annual wellness visit (AWV) for Part B beneficiaries effective Jan. 1 and last month, CMS announced the new codes for the AWVs. Everything seemed to look perfect until came the time for claims submissions and came the denials along with it.

The MACs may have hit a few speedbumps while processing the first of the AWV claims, but are attempting to get their systems rolling smoothly as January closes out for codes G0438 (Annual wellness visit, initial) and G0439 (Annual wellness visit, subsequent). We give you answers to several questions — straight from the MACs themselves — which may help you ensure that your claims go through smoothly.

Which Diagnosis Code Should You Use?

Several subscribers have told the Insider that they submitted their AWV claims using ICD-9 code V70.0 (Routine general medical examination at a health care facility), but faced immediate denials due to MACs claiming that this is the wrong diagnosis code.

It appears that those denials were the result of a computer glitch that made the AWV codes non-payable when billed with V70.0, but some payers have already fixed this problem.

National Government Services, a Part B payer in four states, sent out a notification on Jan. 25 stating that they “omitted the editing for diagnosis code V70.0 that is allowable with HCPCS codes G0438 and G0439, and claims that were initially denied are being reprocessed.

Pinnacle Business Solutions, a Part B MAC in two states, ran a notification on its Web site on Jan. 21 stating that a system error in the claims processing system incorrectly denied claims for G0438-G0439 between Jan. 1 and Jan 20. “A...

Comments Off on New AWV Codes: Here’s What the MACs Are Saying

Ordering/Referring PECOS Edits Won’t Be Instituted Until July

Here comes a late holiday gift for Part B practices. Thanks to a new transmittal on the topic, CMS has announced that MACs won’t institute ordering/referring PECOS edits until July.

Currently, if you submit claims for services or items ordered/referred and the ordering or referring physician’s information is not in the MAC’s claims system or in PECOS, your practice will get an informational message letting you know that the practitioner’s information is missing from the system. It was previously announced that MACs would start denying these claims on Jan. 3, but CMS announced on Dec. 16 that claim denials won’t begin until July 5.

In Part B, MACs will take two steps before denying your claims. First, the carrier will check whether the ordering/referring physician is in PECOS. If not, the MAC will try to find the provider in the Claims Processing System Master Provider File. If the physician is in neither system, the claim will be rejected starting this July.

Even though CMS won’t reject your claims this month, you should still take this time to ensure that you and your ordering/referring providers are in PECOS as soon as possible, just in case the MAC edits become a reality, said National Government Services’ Andrea Freibauer during a Nov. 9 webinar on ordered and referred services.

To read the updated CMS transmittal, visit http://www.cms.gov/transmittals/downloads/R825OTN.pdf.

Hospices benefited from a separate holiday gift that CMS delivered just before Christmas – a delay of the enforcement date for the new face to face encounter requirement.

For weeks, hospices, home care providers, and their representatives had been giving CMS the full court press about the burdensome new physician visit requirement. In a Dec. 15 letter to CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, more than 25 senior and long-term care organizations joined the National...

Comments Off on Ordering/Referring PECOS Edits Won’t Be Instituted Until July

Comply With Medicare Signature Rules or Risk Payments

Question: One of our physicians likes to sign everything with just his initials, or sometimes an illegible scrawl. Do we need some type of documentation to support what an auditor might not be able to read? Answer: Yes, you would be wise to keep a sign...

Comments Off on Comply With Medicare Signature Rules or Risk Payments

PT Coders: Clinging to MD Approval? Check This Out

Question: Our hospital billing and medical departments say that diagnoses we add to a claim for reimbursement must have a physician endorsement. We’ve researched our Local Coverage Determination (L26884) from National Government Services, the Ingenix Coding & Payment Guide for...

Comments Off on PT Coders: Clinging to MD Approval? Check This Out

Global Billing: Document ‘Unrelated’ for Modifier 79 Services

MACs are looking for ‘red flags’ to halt additional global period pay Billing for additional services during a global surgery period is always tricky, but now you can expect special scrutiny for modifier 79 claims. After the OIG got wind of fraudulent surgery billing with modifier 79 (Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period), CMS contractors have been on the hunt [...] Related articles:

  1. These 8 Services Are Not Part Of The Global Surgical PackageIf you’re not reporting these services separately, you’re losing money....
  2. Modifier Cheat Sheet: Banish Your E/M Modifier Phobias ForeverOnce you have this tool, you’ll never again wonder which...
  3. Bone Up On ASC Orthopedic Coding With These Global Period, Modifier Tips 3 ways your physician claim better look different than...

Comments Off on Global Billing: Document ‘Unrelated’ for Modifier 79 Services