Question: Our cardiology practice employs a non-physicián practitioner (NPP) who performs a lot of E/M services for our patients, and that NPP received a bonus payment as part of the Primary Care Incentive Payment Program, which surprised us. We wan...
Don’t let nurses do the doctor’s work, or risk downcoded E/Ms upon audit.
The only parts of the E/M visit that an RN can document independently are the Review of Systems (ROS), Past, Family, and Social History (PFSH) and Vital Signs, according to a June 4, 2010 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) answer from Palmetto GBA, Part B carrier for Ohio. The physician or mid-level provider must review those three areas and write a statement that the documentation is correct or add to it.
Only the physician or non-physician practitioner who conducts the E/M service can perform the History of Present Illness (HPI), Palmetto says.
Exception: In some cases, an office or Emergency Department triage nurse can document “pertinent information” regarding the Chief Complaint or HPI, Palmetto says. But you should treat those notes as “preliminary information.” The doctor providing the E/M service must “document that he or she explored the HPI in more detail,” Palmetto explains.
Other payers have expanded on Palmetto’s announcement, letting physicians know that they cannot simply initial the nurse’s documentation. For example, Noridian Medicare publishes a policy that states, “Reviewing information obtained by ancillary staff and writing a declarative sentence does not suffice for the history of present illness (HPI). An example of unacceptable HPI documentation would be ‘I have reviewed the HPI and agree with above.’”
Good news: Thanks to this clarification, your doctor won’t have to repeat the triage nurse’s work. Right now, if the nurse writes “knee pain x 4 days,” at the top of the note, some auditors might insist that your doctor needs to write “knee pain x 4 days” in his/her own handwriting underneath. But that requirement is a thing of the past if your carrier echoes Palmetto’s requirement.
Bad news: Now this carrier has made it...
Decipher why you should include a seconding diagnosis.
Question: A 38-year-old patient presents to the emergency room with complaints of wheezing, coughing, and trouble catching her breath. After the nonphysician practitioner (NPP) performs a problem-focused history, the physician performs a detailed history and exam and discovers focal ronchi. The physician orders a two-view chest x-ray to check for upper respiratory infection (URI) The chest x-ray results reveal acute URI, and the ronchi clears up upon reevaluation. The patient is treated with antibiotics. How should I code this scenario?
Answer:You’ll submit two of each for this claim: CPT codes, modifiers,and ICD-9 codes. On the claim, report the following:
Secondary Dx decoded: Even though the focal ronchi cleared up on reexamination, you should still include 786.7 on the claim. It will help paint a more lucid portrait of the patient’s condition, and can only strengthen your medical necessity case for the chest-x-ray.
@ Part B Insider. Editor:...
Choose the service level using the documented history, exam, and MDM. Question: A new patient with a chronic gastric ulcer meets the gastroenterologist for management of her condition. The gastroenterologist meets for 34 minutes with the patient, and performs an expanded problem focused history and exam and straightforward medical decision making. The note also indicate that [...] Related articles:
Heads up: These vaccine admin codes are excluded from incident-to requirements. Incident-to rules don’t always apply to diagnostic services, but many medical practices aren’t aware of that. And based on a new wave of scrutiny directed toward incident-to claims, you should know physician supervision rules inside and out. A recent audit from the HHS Office of the Inspector [...] Related articles: