Modifier 58, 78, 79 Tips to Get Postop Surgery Paid Correctly

Don’t miss out on extra pay when global period resets.

Just because you routinely append modifiers to your claims doesn’t mean you’re filing correctly and getting the most appropriate pay. Brush up on your modifier know-how with these tips for three of the trickiest choices: modifiers 58, 78, and 79.

Selecting between these modifiers can be carrier-specific in some situations, says Jacqui Jones, office manager for Benjamin F. Balme, MD, PC in Klamath Falls, Ore.

Remember All Possible Uses for 58

The descriptor for modifier 58 seems self-explanatory: Staged or related procedure by the same physician during the postoperative period. Coders sometimes trip, however, when they forget that modifier 58 actually applies to subsequent procedures that fall into one of three categories:

Planned or anticipated (staged):  A good example might be an infected hand that has to be debrided several times over the course of a couple of weeks. You won’t use a modifier on the first procedure, but will add modifier 58 on the subsequent procedures.

More extensive than the original procedure: The physician manipulates a patient’s ulnar fracture. An x-ray at the follow-up appointment shows that the reduction failed, so the physician completes pinning or an open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF). Code the procedure as needed (with 25545, Open treatment of ulnar shaft fracture, includes internal fixation, when performed, for example) and append modifier 58.

Therapy or treatment following a surgical or diagnostic procedure: This could apply to a soft tissue biopsy followed at a later date by malignant tumor excision.

You’ll only append modifier 58 to the second procedure if it occurs during the first procedure’s global period. The date of the second procedure resets the global period. You should expect 100 percent reimbursement for procedures you file with modifier 58.

Verify ‘Surprise’ Before Reporting 78...

Comments Off on Modifier 58, 78, 79 Tips to Get Postop Surgery Paid Correctly

Cost of Freezing Conversion Factor is Over $6 Billion — Just for 2010

Plus: The OIG recovered over $1.5 billion in fiscal year 2009, and is on the lookout to collect more.

With less than two weeks to go before Medicare payments once again threaten to decrease by 21 percent, a new report sheds light on the financial outcome of Congressional actions.

Although the 2010 Physician Fee Schedule originally included a conversion factor that would have been 21 percent lower than the 2009 level, practices haven’t felt that cut yet this year,because legislators have voted several times to freeze payments, which now use the conversion factor of $36.0791. That freeze will expire on May 31, after which your Medicare payments will drop considerably unless Congress steps in once more.

However, one government entity’s calculations show that the freeze is costly. According to a May 7 Congressional Budget Office report, freezing payments at the current levels for the rest of 2010 would cost the government… … $6.5 billion. The AMA has turned up the heat on Congress to replace the current payment method, releasing a print ad aimed at Congress to demonstrate that “more delays of permanent reform now increase the cost for taxpayers,” and that the association “calls on Congress to fix the flawed Medicare physician payment formula now.”

Congress has not yet introduced a bill to extend the payment freeze past May 31. Keep an eye on the Insider for more information as this story develops.

To read the Congressional Budget Office’s calculation sheet,visit www.cbo.gov/budget/factsheets/2010b/SGR-menu.pdf.

Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming on-demand Webinar, 5 Steps to Optimize Your Office’s Coding & Billing Practices, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Cost of Freezing Conversion Factor is Over $6 Billion — Just for 2010