CMS Offers Great News With Fee Schedule Changes

Boost co-surgery, multiple surgery, and bilateral surgery pay for these select procedures

You’ll no longer have to eat the cost of your services if your physician acts as co-surgeon on spine revisions. Thanks to several Fee Schedule changes that CMS recently enacted. CMS had good news in MLN Matters article MM7430, which had an effective date of Jan. 1, 2011 and an implementation date of July 5, 2011.

Look for Potential Co-Surgery Payment for These Codes:

CMS will change the co-surgery indicator for spine revision codes 22212 and 22222 from “0” to “1”. Keep in mind that supporting documentation is required when billing for a co-surgeon with these procedures, so don’t forget to submit that with your claim or you’ll be looking at bad news.

Remember: If you’re billing for co-surgery, append modifier 62 (Two surgeons) to your procedure code. For modifier 62 claims, most payers pay an additional fee (generally 125 percent of the “usual” fee for the procedure, split evenly between the two surgeons). Avoid reimbursement problems by checking these claims carefully. To claim co-surgeons, each surgeon must perform a distinct portion of a single CPT procedure, and each surgeon must dictate and submit his own operative report for his portion of the surgery.

Benefit From Surgical Assist Changes:

Practices that perform sinus endoscopies will also get a potential boost from the fee schedule changes, now that you’ll see the assistant at surgery indicator change for codes 31233 and 31235 from “1” (Assistant at surgery may not be paid) to “0” (Payment restrictions for assistants at surgery applies to this procedure unless supporting documentation is submitted to establish medical necessity).

You’ll append modifier 80 to the assistant’s surgical codes if the assisting surgeon is a physician. In cases when a non-physician assists at surgery on Medicare patients, append...

Comments Off on CMS Offers Great News With Fee Schedule Changes

Accessory Sinuses Service Coding: Snag $217 with These 3 FAQs

Given the variety of anatomic sites, surgical techniques, and types of instrumentation involved in transnasal turbinate surgery, it is the one of the most difficult coding scenarios.

Your otolaryngologist removes the middle turbinate during an endoscopic ethmoidectomy (31254, Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with ethmoidectomy, partial [anterior], or 31255, Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with ethmoidectomy, total [anterior and posterior]) or endoscopic polypectomy (31237, Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with biopsy, polypectomy or debridement [separate procedure]). The middle turbinates are considered access to the sinuses, so you should be able to tell that the removal of the middle turbinate should not be reported separately.

Check out these 3 frequently asked questions (FAQs) to help master your turbinate surgery coding skills.

Should 30130 and 30140 Go Hand-in-Hand?

Suppose the documentation states that the physician entered or excised mucosa and subsequently preserved it. This implies that you should use 30140 (Submucous resection inferior turbinate, partial or complete, any method) to report this service. However, simply reporting that the turbinate was excised is probably not enough documentation for this code. Don’t forget to bill 30130 (Excision inferior turbinate, partial or complete, any method) if there is no evidence of the preservation of the mucosa and the op note just indicates that the inferior turbinate was excised or resected.

Remember that you should not bill 30140 with 30130 — you would bill one or the other, for a single side. “However, if a submucousal resection (preservation of the mucosa) is performed on one side and a straight excision is performed on the other side (no preservation of mucosa), you would code 30140-RT and 30130-59-LT, for example,” explains Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CENTC, CPC-H, CPC-P, CPC-I, CHCC, president of CRN Healthcare Solutions, a consulting firm in Tinton Falls, N.J. The RT and LT would represent which side each procedure...

Comments Off on Accessory Sinuses Service Coding: Snag $217 with These 3 FAQs