Hot Coding Topics / Provider News

Ordering/Referring PECOS Edits Won’t Be Instituted Until July

Here comes a late holiday gift for Part B practices. Thanks to a new transmittal on the topic, CMS has announced that MACs won’t institute ordering/referring PECOS edits until July.

Currently, if you submit claims for services or items ordered/referred and the ordering or referring physician’s information is not in the MAC’s claims system or in PECOS, your practice will get an informational message letting you know that the practitioner’s information is missing from the system. It was previously announced that MACs would start denying these claims on Jan. 3, but CMS announced on Dec. 16 that claim denials won’t begin until July 5.

In Part B, MACs will take two steps before denying your claims. First, the carrier will check whether the ordering/referring physician is in PECOS. If not, the MAC will try to find the provider in the Claims Processing System Master Provider File. If the physician is in neither system, the claim will be rejected starting this July.

Even though CMS won’t reject your claims this month, you should still take this time to ensure that you and your ordering/referring providers are in PECOS as soon as possible, just in case the MAC edits become a reality, said National Government Services’ Andrea Freibauer during a Nov. 9 webinar on ordered and referred services.

To read the updated CMS transmittal, visit http://www.cms.gov/transmittals/downloads/R825OTN.pdf.

Hospices benefited from a separate holiday gift that CMS delivered just before Christmas – a delay of the enforcement date for the new face to face encounter requirement.

For weeks, hospices, home care providers, and their representatives had been giving CMS the full court press about the burdensome new physician visit requirement. In a Dec. 15 letter to CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, more than 25 senior and long-term care organizations joined the National...

Comments Off on Ordering/Referring PECOS Edits Won’t Be Instituted Until July
January 18, 2011
Toolkit

Wound Care: Refer to This Handy Chart to Make Graft Coding a Cinch

Careful: Skip over codes for legs and zero in on foot codes.

With the many graft options — including those taken from cadavers, pigs, and newborns — correctly coding a skin graft procedure can leave you guessing. Use this chart to narrow down the grafting field by matching definitions, product names, and treatment applications to CPT codes. Then, you’ll be sure to sail through coding your next graft claim.

Don’t miss: Nothing will get your claim denied faster than using a CPT code not linked to the diagnosis code. Thus, take care to avoid CPT codes for other body areas, such as the legs, which are generally listed above the code for the feet for each type of graft. Below, you will find only CPT codes that you can use to report grafts performed on feet.

Note: Be sure to periodically review the payer’s local coverage determination to ensure your office is in compliance for your state or region.

Remember: Site preparation, lesion excision, and supply (HCPCS) codes may also apply for these services (in addition to the above listed CPT codes). Look in future issues for more on coding skin graft services by subscribing to Podiatry Coding & Billing Alert. Editor: Stacie Borrello.

Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, Why That Wound Won’t Heal: Practical Tips to Get Wounds Moving, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Wound Care: Refer to This Handy Chart to Make Graft Coding a Cinch
May 27, 2010
Cardiology / CMS / MAC / Provider News

MACs Differ on Response to CMS’s Cardiology Payment Adjustments

Don’t look for a raise just yet, in most cases.

CMS may talk, but MACs don’t always listen — at least not quickly.

As we told you in last week’s Insider, CMS recently corrected several “technical errors” published in the 2010 Fee Schedule, and thanks to these corrections, Medicare will increase payment for several cardiology-related testing codes, including codes 75571-75574 (Heart CT) and 78451-78454 (Heart muscle SPECT imaging).

Although many practices are eager to see the payment boosts in their next Medicare payments, that may be an overly ambitious goal at this point.

“I inquired with a few MAC carriers such as Trailblazer, Noridian, and Palmetto, and was told different things by different Medicare payers,” says Terry Fletcher, BS, CPC, CCS-P, CCS, CMSCS, CCC, CEMS, CMS, CEO of Terry Fletcher Consulting Inc.

“One did not even know there was a change,” she says. “Next, Noridian said that they will be making the adjustments when they get the directive from CMS. And Palmetto said they would need the provider to contact them and then batch retroactive to January the myocardial perfusion imaging claims and send a letter to request the increase,” she says.

Bottom line: Until CMS provides a clear answer to the MACs regarding when they must implement the changes, you may not see your pay increases, but keep an eye on your carrier’s Web site for information on when it intends to reprocess claims using the new rates.

@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, You Can Use the Appeals Process Like a Pro, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on MACs Differ on Response to CMS’s Cardiology Payment Adjustments
May 27, 2010
Audit / CMS / Oig / RAC / Toolkit

Recovery Audit Contractors: Know These RAC Fast Facts

RACs are just another tool in the government’s arsenal to collect improper payments.

You’ve got so many compliance acronyms flying at you every day that you may not be able to differentiate your RAC from the OIG. Know these quick facts about RACs to stay better informed.

  • Recovery audit contractors (RACs) detect and correct past improper payments so CMS and the MACs can prevent such problems in the future
  • RACs are hired as contractors by the government, and they can can collect “contingency fees,” which means that they get a percentage of the amount that they recover from providers who were paid inappropriately The maximum RAC lookback period is three years, and they cannot review claims paid prior to Oct. 1, 2007
  • Between 2005 and 2008, RACs involved in the original demonstration project recovered over $1.03 billion in Medicare improper payments, but referred only two cases of potential fraud to CMS, according to a February OIG report on the topic, which noted that “because RACs do not receive their contingency fees for cases they refer that are determined to be fraud, there may be a disincentive for RACs to refer potential cases of fraud.”
  • Unlike RACs, the OIG is a government entity. Although the OIG also performs reviews and audits and seeks improper payments, the OIG does not collect contingency fees.

For more on the RAC program, visit www.cms.gov/rac.

@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, You Can Use the Appeals Process Like a Pro, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Recovery Audit Contractors: Know These RAC Fast Facts
May 24, 2010