Radiology Coding: Watch for 4 Key ICD-9 Additions

From head to toe, the new diagnosis codes hold something for everyone.

Whether your patients present with cardiologic, orthopedic, or gynecologic complaints, the next round of ICD-9 codes could hold important changes for you. Here’s the rundown on the new codes most relevant to radiologists — including a new option for retained magnetic metal fragments.

Remember: ICD-9 2011 will go into effect Oct. 1, 2010. The official version will be released in the fall, so the codes below are not yet final.

1. Look Forward to More Specific Ectasia Codes

The proposed changes to ICD-9 2011 add four codes specific to aortic ectasia. These codes are among the most significant changes for radiology coders because you may see that term in your radiologist’s findings, says Helen L. Avery, CPC, CHC, CPC-I, manager of revenue cycle services for Los Angeles-based Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting Inc. “Ectasia” means dilation or enlargement, and aortic ectasia typically refers to enlargement that is milder than an aneurysm. But ICD-9 2010 does not distinguish ectasia from aneurysm, indexing aortic ectasia to 441.9 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site without mention of rupture) and 441.5 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site, ruptured).

The proposed 2011 codes are specific to aortic ectasia and differ based on anatomic site:

  • 447.70 — Aortic ectasia, unspecified site
  • 447.71 — Thoracic aortic ectasia
  • 447.72 — Abdominal aortic ectasia
  • 447.73 — Thoracoabdominal aortic ectasia.

2. Watch for ‘Claudication’ in Stenosis Report

Another one of the important changes is the proposed addition of 724.03 (Spinal stenosis, lumbar region, with neurogenic claudication), says Avery. The code refers to lumbar spinal stenosis, which is a narrowing of the spinal canal, according to the Sept. 16-17, 2009, ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting proposal (available here). Neurogenic claudication “is a commonly used term for a...

Comments Off on Radiology Coding: Watch for 4 Key ICD-9 Additions

Collect HPV Pay with Proper Screening vs. Reflex Diagnoses

Align ‘medical necessity’ with ICD-9 instruction.

Ordering a human papillomavirus (HPV) screen with a Pap test isn’t the same as ordering a reflex HPV screen following an abnormal Pap. Although ICD-9 instruction and coverage rules might appear to be at loggerheads, our experts can show you the way out.

Question: Should the physician order a screening and/or reflex HPV Pap test (such as 87621, Infectious agent detection by nucleic acid [DNA or RNA]; papillomavirus, human, amplified probe technique) with V73.81 (Special screening examination for human papillomavirus [HPV])?

What you stand to gain: “Many ‘V’ codes are paid as part of a screening benefit for patients who have those specific benefits,” says Tina Burkhalter, billing manager with SouthEastern Pathology in Rome, Ga. On the other hand,

“tests ordered with diagnostic codes tend to go to the deductible,” she says. “We hear from patients complaining that they must pay for the HPV test because their insurer tells them we used the ‘wrong’ code.”

Medical Necessity Points to 795.0x

Although no national coverage policy exists for screening HPV testing to evaluate cervical cancer risk, many payers follow the consensus guidelines recommended by the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP).

A core ASCCP recommendation is to screen for high-risk HPV DNA in patients over the age of 20 years with a Pap cytologic result of 795.01 (Papanicolaou smear of cervix with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASC-US]). The guidelines also address the role of HPV with other Pap outcomes in special populations, such as recommending reflex HPV testing for postmenopausal women with cytologic findings of 795.03 (Papanicolaou smear of cervix with low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LGSIL]).

Key: If your payers have adopted any or all of these guidelines, you’ll need to report the Pap findings, such as 795.01, to show...

Comments Off on Collect HPV Pay with Proper Screening vs. Reflex Diagnoses