Coding Challenge

Cyst Expression: I&D or Excision?

Question: Documentation reads, “The cyst was excised after performing a central incision directly on the cyst. All the material was expressed, then cyst capsule was removed completely and excised completely. Packing was performed.” Should I code the procedure as an I&D or an excision?

Supercoder.com/forum/

Answer: You should look at the pathology report and any further excision description to reach the correct code set. “Excision is defined as full thickness [through the dermis] removal of a lesion …,” according to CPT’s Excision-Benign Lesions guidelines. The documentation you provided does not indicate what tissue levels the excision involved. A cyst can be epidermal or sebaceous (706.2). A lesion that is removed from the epidermis (top skin layer) does not meet CPT’s excision definition.

The sebaceous gland extends through the dermis. Excision that deep would qualify for an excision code. An excision code (such as 11400, Excision, benign lesion including margins, except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], trunk, arms or legs; excised diameter 0.5 cm or less) requires further documentation detailing the lesion’s morphology, size (including margins), and anatomical location. Without this information, the I&D code (10060, Incision and drainage of abscess [e.g., carbuncle, suppurative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia]; simple or single) may be more appropriate. The physician made a cut to drain the cyst and then drained (expressed) all the material. The cyst capsule removal is part of the treatment of the I&D to prevent the blockage from reoccurring.

Take more coding challenges with Family Practice Coding Alert. Written by Jen Godreau, BA, CPC, CPEDC, content director of Supercoder.com, Family Practice Coding Alert, Volume 12, Number 6.

Comments Off on Cyst Expression: I&D or Excision?
August 12, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

ICD-9 2011 Diagnosis Coding: New Ectasia Codes Come Oct. 1

Check out V13.65 for corrected congenital heart malformations.

Each October you’re faced with new ICD-9 codes to add to your diagnosis arsenal. 2011 is no exception, with new ectasia, congenital malformation, and body mass index (BMI) codes you’ll need to learn. Take a look at the proposed changes that will affect your cardiology practice, so that you’re ready when fall rolls around.

End Your Ectasia Hunt at 447.7x

The proposed changes to ICD-9 2011 add four codes specific to aortic ectasia, which could be among the most significant changes for cardiology coders.

“Ectasia” means dilation or enlargement, and aortic ectasia often refers to an enlargement that is milder than an aneurysm. But ICD-9 2010 does not distinguish ectasia from aneurysm, linking aortic ectasia to 441.9 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site without mention of rupture) and 441.5 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site, ruptured).

The proposed 2011 codes are specific to aortic ectasia and are based on anatomic site:

  • 447.70 — Aortic ectasia, unspecified site
  • 447.71 — Thoracic aortic ectasia
  • 447.72 — Abdominal aortic ectasia
  • 447.73 — Thoracoabdominal aortic ectasia.

New Corrected Congenital Malformations Code

A number of new codes deal with congenital malformations of the heart and circulatory system. Code V13.65 (Personal history of [corrected] congenital malformations of heart and circulatory system) will be “very useful to our practice,” says Janel C. Peterson, CPC, with Alegent Health Clinic Heart and Vascular Specialists in Omaha, Neb.

Add BMI V Codes to Your E/M Arsenal

The ICD-9 proposal has “expanded the body mass index (BMI) codes to demonstrate higher BMIs with five new codes,” notes Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CPC-H, CPC-P, CENTC, CHCC, with CRN Healthcare Solutions in Tinton Falls, N.J.

You’ll need to stop using V85.4 (Body Mass Index 40 and over, adult) on Oct. 1 and start...

Comments Off on ICD-9 2011 Diagnosis Coding: New Ectasia Codes Come Oct. 1
August 12, 2010
Coding Challenge

Medicare Repeat Pap Smears: Find Out If 99000 Is OK

Hint: Abnormal versus insufficient cells mean different diagnosis codes.

When a patient returns to your office for a repeat Pap smear, you’ve got to weigh your options of E/M and specimen handling codes, as well as diagnosis codes. Take this challenge to see how you fare and prevent payment from slipping through your fingers.

Question 1: When a patient comes in for a second Pap smear, what CPT code(s) should you apply and why?
 
Question 2: Will you receive reimbursement for handling the repeat Pap smear? Why or why not?

Question 3: If the patient comes back in for a Pap smear due to abnormal results, what ICD-9 code(s) should you use and why?

Question 4: If the patient has a repeat Pap because the lab did not have enough cells in the specimen to interpret the results, what ICD-9 code(s) should you use and why?

Answer 1: Here’s What CPT Codes
 
When the patient comes in for a second Pap smear, submit the appropriate E/M office visit code (99211-99215). You will probably be able to report 99212 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient …) for this visit becausethe patient likely will come in only for the Pap smear and CPT does not include a specific code for taking the Pap. Code 99212 carries 1.08 relative value units (RVUs), unadjusted for geography. That translates to about $31 for this visit (using the new conversion factor of 28.3868).
Answer 2: Handling the Specimen Depends on Payer


Some private payers will reimburse for handling the repeat Pap smear specimen (99000, Handling and/or conveyance of specimen for transfer from the physician’s office to a laboratory). But Medicare carriers consider the collection and handling part of a problem E/M...

Comments Off on Medicare Repeat Pap Smears: Find Out If 99000 Is OK
August 12, 2010
Provider News

CCI 16.2 Bundles Paravertebral Facets With Anesthesia Procedures

Don’t assume separate coding for J0670, anymore.

The latest Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits contain plenty of anesthesia and pain management pairs you should check — and straight away. They went into effect July 1. CCI 16.2 encompasses 16,843 new edit pairs, according to analyst Frank Cohen, MPA, of MIT Solutions, Inc., in Clearwater, Fla. With 11 percent of all active edits affecting anesthesia procedures, you can’t afford to miss any of the changes.

Other Work Includes Paravertebral Facet Injection

Although the current CPT book doesn’t include them, you could begin using several new codes for paravertebral facet joint injections in January 2010. Now CCI edits bundle two of the new codes with every anesthesia code (00100-01999) and many nerve destruction procedures. The paravertebral injection codes affected are:

  • 0213T — Injection(s), diagnostic or therapeutic agent, paravertebral facet (zygapophyseal) joint (or nerves innervating that joint) with ultrasound guidance, cervical or thoracic; single level
  • 0216T — Injection(s), diagnostic or therapeutic agent, paravertebral facet (zygapophyseal) joint (or nerves innervating that joint) with ultrasound guidance, lumbar or sacral; single level.

Procedures paired with 0213T and 0216T range from 64600 (Destruction by neurolytic agent, trigeminal nerve; supraorbital, infraorbital, mental, or inferior alveolar branch) and 64622 (Destruction by neurolytic agent, paravertebral facet joint nerve; lumbar or sacral, single level) to 64650 (Chemodenervation of eccrine glands; both axillae). Most of the edit pairs carry a “0” modifier indicator, but CCI lists a few with modifier indicator “1.” Check the full CCI file to verify whether you can use a modifier to break specific edits.

ME Edits Also Hit 0213T-0218T

Paravertebral facet joint injection codes 0213T-0218T come into play as part of mutually exclusive (ME) edits, as well.

CCI 16.2 pairs each choice with corresponding codes involving fluoroscopy or CT guidance: 64490-64492 (Injection[s], diagnostic or...

Comments Off on CCI 16.2 Bundles Paravertebral Facets With Anesthesia Procedures
August 12, 2010
CMS / Hot Coding Topics / ICD-10

Watch for Denials If You Take Shortcuts on Form 5010

Say goodbye to form 4010A1 for ICD codes as well, starting in 2012.

Dig into your claim forms now to ensure that the beneficiary’s information is accurate to the letter, or you’ll face scores of denied claims on the new HIPAA 5010 forms.

Why it matters: CMS will deny claims on which the beneficiary’s name doesn’t perfectly match how it’s listed on his Medicare I.D. card when you begin using HIPAA 5010 form — the new Medicare universal claim form starting in 2012.

Include Jr. or Sr. Suffixes

“Whenever there is a name suffix, such as ‘Jr.’ or ‘Sr.’ abbreviations, etc., it must be included with the last name,” said Veronica Harshman of CMS’s Division of Medicare Billing Procedures during an April 28 Open Door Forum regarding the eligibility component of the HIPAA 5010 form.

You can include the suffix either with the patient’s last name or in the suffix field, specified CMS’s Chris Stahlecker during the call.

“The date of birth must also match exactly to what the Social Security Administration has on file,” Harshman said. CMS will use several new error codes on claims once the 5010 form goes into effect. “If you communicate with CMS through a third-party vendor (clearinghouse), it is strongly recommended that you discuss with them how these errors will be communicated to you and how these changes will impact you and your business,” Harshman advised.

Look for Production Systems Next Year

According to the HIPAA 5010 Final Rule, CMS will have a production 5010 system available as of Jan. 1, 2011, Harshman said.

The last day CMS will accept a 4010A1 form will be Dec. 31, 2011. As of Jan. 1, 2012, if you aren’t using the 5010 form, you’ll “lose the ability to receive eligibility data from Medicare,” Harshman said. In...

Comments Off on Watch for Denials If You Take Shortcuts on Form 5010
August 12, 2010
Coding Challenge

Protect Incident To Pay

Incident-to services are on auditors radar. To prevent paybacks, you’ve got to know when to use incident to – and capture full pay, and when to bill services directly – and lose the standard 15%. Test your incident to savvy with this question: Qu...

Comments Off on Protect Incident To Pay
August 12, 2010
Coding Challenge

RFA: 64622, 64623 Vs. 64640

With multiple ways to denervate the sensory nerve/nerve branches, pain management coders may argue about which 64xxx code is right. You’ve got to dig into the chart note to identify the method used. See if you’re up to the challenge with this Supercoder Forum Insight.

Question: A provider is doing RFA’s of the left L4, L5, S1, S2, S3 and SA. He is billing 64622 x 1 and 64623 x 4. The other pain provider states this is incorrect and that he should be billing 64640 for S1, S2, S3 and SA. Which coding is correct?

Answer: This is a complex coding issue because there are several different methods to denervate the sensory nerve/nerve branches that provide innervations from the SI joint. Because of this, the coding will depend somewhat on the method used.

However, I can say that reporting 64622 and 64623 x 4 is incorrect. The “paravertebral facet joint nerves” that provide innervations to the facet joints in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions are the medial branches off the dorsal ramus. In the sacrum, there are indeed medial branches, but – as their name indicates – the path for these nerve branches is to the midline to provide innervations to the multifidus muscles and not laterally to the SI joint. So, following the published CPT Instructions for Use of the CPT Codebook – “Do not select a CPT code that merely approximates the service provided”, even though they are similar, procedures performed on the lateral branches of the sacral nerves should not be reported as paravertebral facet joint nerve procedures (i.e., paravertebral facet joint injections or destructions).

A few of the more common techniques are:

  • Separate destruction of each nerve/nerve branch. According to CPT Assistant (Dec. 2009), you would code 64622 for the L5

...

Comments Off on RFA: 64622, 64623 Vs. 64640
August 12, 2010
Provider News

CMS Clarifies How to Report Audiology Services

Look for a physician order for diagnostic audiology tests. If you thought CMS’s May transmittal on coding for audiology services was the last word on the subject, think again. On July 23, the agency rescinded the May directive and issued new guidance...

Comments Off on CMS Clarifies How to Report Audiology Services
August 12, 2010