Hot Coding Topics

Simplify Ear Coding With These Expert Tips

With more patients turning in for a variety of ear conditions, you cannot afford to lose any reimbursement. Look to our expert advice to ensure you’re coding correctly for all of the ear associated diagnoses.

1. Verify Documentation for E/M With 69210

Cerumen removal can present several coding challenges for your practice, particularly if the physician performs the service as a gateway to visualize the ear. Knowing when you can report 69210 (Removal impacted cerumen [separate procedure], 1 or both ears) is key to collecting for this service.

Example: Suppose a patient presents with ear pain, but the physician has to remove impacted cerumen before he can visualize the tympanic membrane. He subsequently diagnoses an ear infection. Your practice wants to bill an office visit and modifier along with 69210 – is that acceptable?

Key: “Whether to report 69210 is always a value judgment because if you just flick a little wax aside to visualize the eardrum, you shouldn’t bill for cerumen removal,” says Charles Scott, MD, FAAP, with Advocare Medford Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine in New Jersey. “Typically, I’ll use that code if I have to use a special device that allows me to curette the ear before I can visualize the tympanic membrane,” he advises.

The July 2005 CPT Assistant states that cerumen is considered “impacted” in several circumstances, one of which is, “cerumen impairs exam of clinically significant portions of the external auditory canal, tympanic membrane, or middle ear condition.” Therefore, if the cerumen is blocking the physician’s view and he has to use special instrumentation to remove it above and beyond irrigation, most payers allow you to report 69210.

You should ensure that you have separate documentation of the E/M service and procedure to support reporting both codes. Some practices overuse 69210, which means many...

Comments Off on Simplify Ear Coding With These Expert Tips
December 15, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

Clear The Smoke On Debridement And Active Wound Care Codes

Confused about when to choose a debridement code and an active wound code? CPT 2011 is here to your rescue with revised debridement code guidelines that clarify how to choose between the two code groups — and the key word that will tighten up your coding is depth.

“Depth is the only documentation item you need to determine the correct code,” explained Chad Rubin, MD, FACS, AMA Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) Alternate Member with Albert E. Bothe, Jr. MD, FACS, American College of Surgeons, AMA CPT Editorial Panel Member at their joint presentation “General Surgery” at last month’s CPT Symposium in Chicago.

Active wound care, which has a 0 day global period, is for active wound care of the skin, dermis, or epidermis. For deeper wound care, use debridement codes in the appropriate location.

Example: Codes 11040 (Debridement; skin, partial thickness) and 11041 (…full thickness) have been deleted. The parenthetical note under the codes’ deletion reads, “For debridement of skin, i.e., epidermis and/or dermis only, see 97597, 97598.” The codes are revised for 2011 to reflect this change. For instance, the revision for code 11042 (Debridement, subcutaneous tissue [includes epidermis and dermis, if performed]; first 20 sq cm or less) removes “Skin, and” and adds after subcutaneous tissue “includes epidermis and dermis, if performed.”

Code 97597 is revised to (Debridement [e.g., high pressure waterjet with/without suction, sharp selective debridement with scissors, scalpel and forceps], open wound, [e.g., fibrin, devitalized epidermis and/or dermis, exudate, debris, biofilm], including topical application[s], wound assessment, use of a whirlpool, when performed and instruction[s] for ongoing care, per session, total wound[s] surface area; first 20 sq cm or less]).

Code 97597’s revision involves “mainly rewording to make clear how active wound care is separate from integumentary wound care,” Bothe explained.

CPT...

Comments Off on Clear The Smoke On Debridement And Active Wound Care Codes
December 15, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

Flu Vaccines: Replace 90658 by new Q codes

Your vaccine coding in 2011 will be anything but dull, thanks to changes in codes and administration reporting. Two more updates every FP should know involve new Q codes for some Medicare flu vaccines and expanded ages for adolescent vaccine counseling.

Nix 90658 in 2011

CMS has created new HCPCS codes and payment allowances to replace 90658 (Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use). Medicare will no longer pay for 90658 effective Jan. 1, 2011, so choose from the new codes instead, based on the specific product:

  • Q2035 — Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use (Afluria)
  • Q2036 — Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use (Flulaval)
  • Q2037 — Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use (Fluvirin)
  • Q2038 — Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use (Fluzone)
  • Q2039 — Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use (not otherwise specified).

Timing: Codes Q2035-Q2039 went into effect Oct. 1, 2010. You have two choices when filing claims for dates of service from Oct. 1, 2010 until Dec. 31, 2010: bill Medicare immediately with 90658, or hold the claim until Jan. 1, 2011 and file with the appropriate Q code. For vaccines administered after Jan. 1, 2011, only report the applicable Q code.

Explanation: Medicare pays for influenza vaccine based on 95 percent of the average wholesale price. “The products normally classifiable to 90658 have widely varying AWPs,” says Kent J. Moore, manager of...

Comments Off on Flu Vaccines: Replace 90658 by new Q codes
December 15, 2010
Hot Coding Topics / Medicare / Provider News

Medicare Covers 99406, 99407

If you’ve been writing off tobacco cessation counseling as non-payable, it’s time to change your tune.

The change: In the past, you could collect for tobacco cessation counseling for a patient with a tobacco-related disease or with signs or symptoms of one. But on Aug. 25, CMS announced that “under new coverage, any smoker covered by Medicare will be able to receive tobacco cessation counseling from a qualified physician or other Medicare recognized practitioner who can work with them to help them stop using tobacco.”

“For too long, many tobacco users with Medicare coverage were denied access to evidencebased tobacco cessation counseling,” said Kathleen Sebelius, HHS secretary, in an Aug. 25 statement. “Most Medicare beneficiaries want to quit their tobacco use. Now, older adults and other Medicare beneficiaries can get the help they need to successfully overcome tobacco dependence.”

Count Attempts and Minutes

The new tobacco cessation counseling coverage expansion will apply to services under Medicare Part B and Part A. That means your physicians and coders should know how to correctly document and report the sessions.

“Medicare allows billing for two counseling attempts in a year, but each attempt can occur over multiple sessions, with four sessions per attempt,” explains Jennifer Swindle, CPC, CPC-E/M, CPC-FP, RHIT, CCP-P, director of coding and compliance for PivotHealth LLC in Brentwood, Tenn.

According to section 12 of chapter 32 of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, “Claims for smoking and tobacco use cessation counseling services shall be submitted with an appropriate diagnosis code. Diagnosis codes should reflect: the condition the patient has that is adversely affected by tobacco use or the condition the patient is being treated for with a therapeutic agent whose metabolism or dosing is affected by tobacco use.”

Swindle says 305.1 (Tobacco use disorder) is one diagnosis supporting...

Comments Off on Medicare Covers 99406, 99407
December 13, 2010
Hot Coding Topics / Medicare / Provider News

Replace 90658 With a Q Code, After Jan. 1

Get ready to change your flu vaccine product code 90658 to one of four Q codes. For 2010, report 90658 (Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use) to signify that your physici...

Comments Off on Replace 90658 With a Q Code, After Jan. 1
December 8, 2010
Coding Challenge / Hot Coding Topics / modifier 25

Is 99211 + 95115 OK?

Question: If a nurse has to check vitals to make sure an allergy injection is the correct quantity or if she has to educate the patient about the administration or side effects of the injections, we’ve been billing 99211 with 95115 or 95117. There is...

Comments Off on Is 99211 + 95115 OK?
December 6, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

Switch From 92135 to New Location Based SCODI Codes

 These terms nail down your diabetic retinopathy imaging code choice.

In CPT® 2011 in the place of your old familiar SCODI code, you’ll find three area specific codes. Check out these tips on finding the correct code for imaging as well as DR services.

Code 92135 is being split into three more specific codes. The scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging or SCODI code got used a lot in 2010 and was a high volume code. CPT 2011 deletes the code. Pick the new code based on the particular area the imaging is performed on as follows:

Area CPT 2011 Code Descriptor
Front of the eye 92132 Scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging, anterior segment, with interpretation and report, unilateral or bilateral
Optic nerve 92133 Scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging, posterior segment, with interpretation and report, unilateral or bilateral; optic nerve
Retina 92134 Scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging, posterior segment, with interpretation and report, unilateral or bilateral; retina

 

92227 Vs. 92228: Look at DR Status

Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness. Yet early detection makes the condition correctable 95 percent of the time. Imaging retina center technicians can easily look at a photo and read it. The ophthalmologist can then determine if the patient has DR, the stage it’s in, and the proper course of treatment.

Equate the term “Detection” that’s in new diabetic retinopathy imaging code 92227 (Remote imaging for detection of retinal diseases [e.g., retinopathy in a patient with diabetes] with analysis and report under physician supervision, unilateral or bilateral]) with “screening” for diabetic retinopathy. “Use this...

Comments Off on Switch From 92135 to New Location Based SCODI Codes
December 1, 2010
2011 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule / CPT 2011 / CPT and RBRVS Annual Symposium / Hot Coding Topics

Peds Win Per Component Vaccine Admin Codes, Lose Requested PE RVUs

Pediatricians who were thrilled with CPT 2011’s move to paying vaccines per component got a setback from Medicare’s rejection of the recommended RVUs for new vaccine administration codes 90460 and 90461.

The Relative Update Committe recommended that the 2011 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and Resource Based Relative Value Scale assign 0.20 practice expense (PE) RVUs to 90460 and 0.16 PE RVUs to 90461. But CMS disagreed with the proposal. “We disagree with the recommendations and will maintain 0.17 RVUs for code 90460 and 0.15 RVUs for code 90461 since these codes would be billed on a per toxoid basis,” said Kenneth Simon, MD, MBA, Senior Medical Officer, Center for Medicare and AMA CPT Editorial Panel Member, in “Medicare Physician Payment Schedule 2011 Changes and Beyond” at the CPT® and RBRVS 2011 Annual Symposium on Nov. 10, 2010.

The increased PEs represent an increase in RVUs from the 2010 values for comparable codes 90465/90467 and 90466/90468. The RUC requested the increase in value due to increased time for patient education. Since the new codes are valued per component, CMS felt no increase was warranted.

CMS assigned RVUs to 90460 and 90461 by crosswalking them with the values of the noncounseling vaccine administration codes 90471 and 90472. This means that new code 90460 has the same RVUs as 90471, and each unit of 90461 has the same RVUs as 90472.

The work and total RVUs for the codes include:

<td width="203"
Code PE  RVU  RUC Proposed PE  RVU MPFS Accepted Total RVUs
90460 0.20 0.17 0.59
90461 0.16 0.15 0.3
90465

...

Comments Off on Peds Win Per Component Vaccine Admin Codes, Lose Requested PE RVUs
November 29, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

Senate Stops Physician Payment Cuts

Physicians could feel a little looser on their spending thanks to a hold on the 2011 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule cut. On Nov. 18, the U.S. Senate unanimously consented to halt the Medicare planned conversion factor cut for a 31-day period. The U.S...

Comments Off on Senate Stops Physician Payment Cuts
November 23, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

Aetna Ends Long Term Bundle of 30930 With 30520

A major insurer will now pay for turbinate fracture in addition to septoplasty. Thanks to advocacy from the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgeons (AAO-HNS), Aetna has overturned its coverage position on 30520 and 30930 billed on t...

Comments Off on Aetna Ends Long Term Bundle of 30930 With 30520
November 23, 2010
Coder's Cranium

Calculi Coding: Capture Full Pay for Multiple Fragmentations

When your urologist fragments more than one stone located in two different locations within the urinary tract during one operative session, the proper coding might leave you scratching your head: Can you ever report both procedures? If you can, how do you sequence the codes? Tackle these tough questions by reviewing a sample scenario.

Your urologist performs a ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy of a left ureteral stone and lithotripsy of a bladder stone. How should you code these procedure performed during one operative session?

Separately Report Procedures Based on Anatomy

Depending on where the stones are in the urinary tract, you may be able to separately report and be paid for multiple fragmentation procedures during the same session. For a ureteroscopic fragmentation of a ureteral or renal pelvic stone your urologist performs, you’ll report 52353 (Cystourethroscopy, with ureteroscopy and/or pyeloscopy; with lithotripsy [ureteral catheterization is included]). Remember that 52353 applies to “any type of fragmentation, whether you use a Holmium laser, a Candela laser, a mechanical lithotripsy, or an ultrasonic lithotripter,” says Michael A. Ferragamo, MD, FACS, clinical assistant professor of urology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. If your urologist also fragments a bladder calculus during the same session, your coding will then depend on the different and separate anatomical location of the stones. Therefore, in the sample scenario, you can separately report those procedures. “We are dealing with two separate portions or parts of the urinary tract – a ureteral stone and a bladder stone,” Ferragamo explains.

According to the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI), codes 52317 (Litholapaxy: crushing or fragmentation of calculus by any means in bladder and removal of fragments; simple or small [less than 2.5 cm]) and 52318 (…complicated or large [over 2.5 cm]) are bundled with 52353. Because both bundles have a...

Comments Off on Calculi Coding: Capture Full Pay for Multiple Fragmentations
November 23, 2010