Coder's Cranium / General / Hot Coding Topics / Provider News

$56 Question—Are You Downcóding Your E/M Visits?

You’re not only losing revenue—you’re also coding improperly.

CMS data from previous years shows that medical practices undercodè E/M claims to the tune of over $1 billion annually—that’s money that physiciáns could have collected based on their documentation, but forfeited because they reported a lower-level codè than they should have. But remember that your responsibility as someone who submits claims to Medicarè is to codè based on the documentation—anything else is incorrect coding.

If you’re one of the practices that’s downcoding claims, take note of the following reasons that you should codè based on your documentation rather than undercoding.

Could You Be Triggering an Audit?

The number one reason that many practices undercodè is because they don’t want to “trigger an audit.” However, coding all low-level E/M codès is sure to get a payer’s attention, because the claims reviewers will be wondering why you never offer high-level evaluations to your patients.

When claims reviewers review “bell curves” to determine whether a practice is coding outside the norm, they aren’t just looking for upcoding—they are looking at trends across the board. This means that a practice with all 99212s and 99213s will be vulnerable, because nearly every practice sees more complex patients requiring high-level E/Ms at least once in a while. If an auditor reviews your rècords and determines that you’re deliberately downcoding claims, they’ll conclude that you’ve been coding improperly.

Consider Compliance Implications

If you’re deliberately undercoding your claims to stay under the radar, you’re technically violating the False Claims Act because you are knowingly submitting a false claim. “It’s a violation just as much as deliberate upcoding is a violation, but the government most likely isn’t going to pursue it because ultimately it savès the Medicarè program money,” says John B. Reiss, PhD, JD, a health care attorney...

Comments Off on $56 Question—Are You Downcóding Your E/M Visits?
May 20, 2011
Coder's Cranium / General / Hot Coding Topics

10120 or Beyond: Site, Depth, Complexity Drive Códe Choice

Follow 3 pointers to snag maximum pay.

From just under the skin to deep within the bowels, your general surgeon might perform a foreign body removal (FBR) that calls on a wide range of coding know-how. Zero in on the right codè every time by implementing these four principles:

1. Use 10120-10121 for Any Site Under Skin

If your surgeon makes an opening to remove any foreign body, such as a glass shard or a metal filing, but doesn’t indicate an anatomic site or depth in the op report, you’ll probably choose 10120 (Incision and removal of foreign body, subcutaneous tissues; simple). You can’t choose a more specific codè if the surgical report doesn’t provide any more documentation.

Caveat: Because the codè requires incision, look for a sharp object when considering 10120. If the documentation doesn’t include this detail, use an E/M service codè (such as 99201-99215, Office or Other Outpatient Services) instead of the skin FBR codè.

Look for complications: If the surgeon uses the term “simple” in the op note or fails to note any extenuating circumstances, you’re good to go with 10120. But the surgeon might perform a complicated FBR, meaning that the foreign body was harder than usual to remove. In these situations, the note should indicate, for example, extended exploration around the wound site, presence of a complicating infection, or sometimes the need to use visualization and localization techniques, such as x-ray. In those cases, you should choose 10121 (… complicated) for a subcutaneous FBR with no mention of anatomic site.

2. Search Musculoskeletal Codè for Specific Site

CPT® contains higher-paying FBR codè s than 10120-10121, but the surgeon needs to document the following two details before you can use the codès:

Location: You’ll find myriad FBR codès scattered throughout CPT®’s “Musculoskeletal System” section (20000-29999),...

Comments Off on 10120 or Beyond: Site, Depth, Complexity Drive Códe Choice
May 20, 2011
Coder's Cranium / General / Hot Coding Topics / Provider News

Adjust Your Codès Easily When Diágnosis Changes During A Patient’s Hospital Stay

Educate your physicián to keep you in the loop on patients’ development.

Just because a patient enters the hospital with one diágnosis doesn’t mean she’ll have that diágnosis for her entire stay. And if you bill for your physicián’s hospital visits with an out-of-date diágnosis, you could lose money or face fraud charges.

The problem: Diagnoses can change in the hospital due to various reasons, including the following, among others: The physicián may narrow down the patient’s problem. For example, a patient may be admitted with chest páin, and the doctor may rule out myocardial infarction and decide the problem is actually gastrointestinal in nature.

The patient may develop other problems. The patient may be admitted for dehydration problems but may start having chest páins.  The patient may experience complications that lead their original complaint to worsen significantly.  You can’t wait for the hospital to send you medical rècords and hope to bill in a timely fashion. You could be waiting six weeks after the patient gets out of the hospital for any rècords. So it’s up to your physicián to let you know if a patient’s diágnosis has changed.

Do this: Educate your physiciáns, and let them know that just because the patient has been admitted with a particular diágnosis doesn’t mean they should bill for that diágnosis for each visit.  To help your physicián track his hospital visits, you might consider giving each physicián a simple form to rècord these evaluations. The physicián could put a sticker with the patient’s hospital identifier on the form and then write the date of each visit, the level of service and the diágnosis.  Each sheet will have roóm for 10 or 12 patient visits.

Diágnosis Tracking Is In the Cards

Another approach is to give your doctor a...

Comments Off on Adjust Your Codès Easily When Diágnosis Changes During A Patient’s Hospital Stay
May 20, 2011
Coder's Cranium / General / Hot Coding Topics / Provider News

Overcome 3 Myths and Claim Reimbursement Opportunities using Modifier 22

Don’t fall for these common body habitus, time, and fee traps.

If you overuse Modifièr 22 (Increased procedural services), you may face increased scrutiny from your payers or even the Office of Inspector General (OIG). But if you avoid the modifièr entirely, you’re likely missing out on reimbursement your cardiologist deserves.

How it works: When a procedure requires significant additional time or effort that falls outside the normal effort of services described by a particular CPT® codè — and no other CPT® codè better describes the work involved in the procedure — you should look to modifièr 22. Modifièr 22 represents those extenuating circumstances that do not merit the use of an additional or alternative CPT® codè but do land outside the norm and may support added reimbursement for a given procedure.  Take a look at these three myths — and the realities — to ensure you don’t fall victim to these modifièr 22 trouble spots.

Myth 1: Morbid Obesity Means Automatic 22

Sometimes, an interventional cardiologist may need to spend more time than usual positioning a morbidly obese patient for a procedure and accèssing the vessels involved in that procedure. In that case, it may be appropriate to append modifièr 22 to the relevant surgical codè. However, it’s not appropriate to assume that just because the patient is morbidly obese you can always append modifièr 22.  “Modifièr 22 is about extra procedural work and, although morbid obesity might lead to extra work, it is not enough in itself,” says Marcella Bucknam, CPC, CCS-P, CPC-H, CCS, CPC-P, COBGC, CCC, Manager of Compliance education for the University of Washington Physiciáns Compliance Program in Seattle.

“Unless time is significant or the intensity of the procedure is increased due to the obesity, then modifièr 22 should not be appended,” warns Maggie Mac, CPC,...

Comments Off on Overcome 3 Myths and Claim Reimbursement Opportunities using Modifier 22
May 20, 2011
Coder's Cranium / General

Simplify Your Endometrial Cancer Claims In Just Three Steps

If your ob-gyn converts a laparoscopic to an open procedure, your coding for endometrial cancer surgeries can drastically transform. Follow these three steps to ward against denials.

Review This Op Note

Preoperative diagnosis: Adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Postoperative diagnosis: Same as above, but greater than 50 percent myometrial invasion, pathology pending.

Operation performed: Laparoscopic assisted transvaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, laparotomy with pelvic and periaortic node dissection, partial omentectomy, pelvic washings.

Procedure: Exam of the pelvic organs revealed an 8-week-size uterus. The right and left ovaries appear to be within normal limits. The ob-gyn found no evidence of excrescences or signs of metastatic disease in the lower pelvis along the bowel or serosa, nor did he discover evidence of metastatic disease in the upper abdomen, liver and dome of the diaphragm. He then performed a dissection.

He removed the uterus vaginally with the assistance of the laparoscope, and the pathologist was present to open the organ and render an opinion.

The pathologist saw an enlarged, fungating, relatively superficial lesion of the endometrium. Up in the patient’s right fundal area, however, the pathologist saw an invasion of the myometrium at least two-thirds of the way through. Given this finding, the ob-gyn decided to perform an open pelvic node dissection. He removed the laparoscope and made a new incision to enter the peritoneum.

He obtained pelvic washings from the right cul-de-sac and pelvic area. He then performed a partial omentectomy with the aid of multiple Kelly clamps.

The ob-gyn did a pelvic node dissection, first on the right side identifying the ureter evenly. He carried down the dissection to include the internal and external iliac lymph nodes. He performed the same procedure on the left side. The dissection took place below the bifurcation of the aorta....

Comments Off on Simplify Your Endometrial Cancer Claims In Just Three Steps
April 28, 2011
Coder's Cranium / modifier 50

Know When to Append Modifier 50 on Bilateral CTS Shots

Your orthopedist injects both of a patient’s wrists to treat carpal tunnel syndrome. Should you just file 20526 with modifier 50 appended and forget about it? Not so fast: If the physician injects both the patient’s wrists to treat CTS, you will ty...

Comments Off on Know When to Append Modifier 50 on Bilateral CTS Shots
March 8, 2011
Coder's Cranium / Hot Coding Topics

Code Correct Closure Level With These Tips

All closures aren’t created equal; one of the nuances of coding these procedures is knowing how to distinguish one type from another. Read on for our experts’ advice on how to assess the three closure levels and assign the best codes.

A simple repair involves primarily the dermis and epidermis. It might involve subcutaneous tissues, but not deep layers.

How do you know when a closure might involve subcutaneous layers but is still considered a simple repair? Your provider’s documentation is the key. The difference is whether the wound is closed in layers or just a single layer, experts note. The provider might decide to include the subcutaneous layer in the closure but does so by bringing the needle through the dermis into the subcutaneous and back. That results in a single-layer closure rather than closing the subcutaneous layer first and then the dermis/epidermis second in separate closure techniques.

But “simple” doesn’t mean the repair is something anyone could do. Simple repairs involve one-layer closure, which helps set them apart from a standard E/M procedure. Simple repair also includes “local anesthesia, and chemical or electrocauterization of wounds not closed,” says Dilsia Santiago, CCS, CCS-P, a coder in Reading, Pa.

For example, if your dermatologist uses adhesive strips to close a laceration, consider it an E/M service that you’ll report with the best-fitting choice from codes 99201-99205 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of a new patient …) or 99211-99215 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient …). Most Steri-strip applications are done by nursing staff; but even if the physician applies them, they’re included in the E/M service.

If, however, your dermatologist uses sutures, staples, or tissue adhesives to close the laceration, consider it a separate procedure. Choose...

Comments Off on Code Correct Closure Level With These Tips
February 28, 2011
Coder's Cranium / ICD-10

ICD-10: Here’s How To Report Hiatal Hernia In 2013

When ICD-9 becomes ICD-10 in 2013, you’ll need to get familiar with different sections in the new diagnosis code system, even if the condition you’re reporting has a simple one-to-one crosswalk. When your surgeon performs a hiatal hernia repair, yo...

Comments Off on ICD-10: Here’s How To Report Hiatal Hernia In 2013
February 27, 2011
Coder's Cranium / modifier 52 / modifier 53

Modifiers 52 or 53? Prevent Denials By Making The Correct Choice

If you mistake modifiers 52 and 53 as one or the other because they’re both used for incomplete procedures, you’ll end up losing your reimbursement. Remember these two have extremely distinctive functions.

Consider a situation when the gastroenterologist performs an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) to examine the lining of the esophagus, stomach, and upper duodenum of a patient as part of a GERD evaluation.

Suppose that while inserting the endoscope, the patient registers unstable vital signs. The gastroenterologist, then, decides it is not in the patient’s best interest to continue the procedure. You would report this on your claim using:

  • 43235 (Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy including esophagus, stomach, and either the duodenum and/or jejunum as appropriate; diagnostic, with or without collection of specimen[s] by brushing or washing [separate procedure]) for the EDG
  • Modifier 53 (Discontinued procedure) to show that the GI discontinued the EGD.

Other situations that would call for a discontinued procedure include respiratory distress (786.09), hypoxia (799.02), irregular heart rhythm (427.9), and others usually related to the sedation medications.

Modifier 53 Defined: Under certain circumstances, the physician may elect to terminate a surgical or diagnostic procedure. Due to extenuating circumstances, or those that threaten the well-being of the patient, it may be necessary to indicate that a surgical or diagnostic procedure was started but discontinued.

In addition, you shouldn’t disregard the importance of submitting documentation that shows:

  • that the physician began the procedure;
  • why the procedure was discontinued;
  • the percentage of the procedure performed.

Taking on the same scenario, the gastroenterologist begins the diagnostic EGD but stopped without examining the entire upper gastrointestinal tract because she encounters an obstructing lesion in the middle of the stomach. In this case, you should attach modifier 52 to the CPT, says Margaret Lamb, RHIT, CPC, of Great Falls Clinic...

Comments Off on Modifiers 52 or 53? Prevent Denials By Making The Correct Choice
February 17, 2011
Coder's Cranium / Hot Coding Topics / modifier 62 / modifier 80 / modifier AS / multi-provider coding / Multiple procedures

Multi-Provider Coding: Modifier 62 Can Save You $4k

When you come face-to-face with multi-provider situation, the last thing you would want is to mess up your coding by assigning the wrong modifier(s).

Imagine a 70-year-old female patient presenting with COPD and coronary artery disease, status post myocardial infarction (CAD s/p MI) having a 28 mm of inner diameter thoracic aortic aneurysm. Imaging studies indicate the aneurysm to be descending. The cardiologist, together with a thoracic surgeon, decides to perform an open operative repair with graft replacement of the diseased segment.

The main key in a multi-provider scenario is to treat each physician’s work as a separate activity. However, deciding when to report a case as co-surgery, assistant surgery — or something else — has more to it than meets the eye. Find out what with this expert’s advice.

You know that a modifier is at hand in this case, but more importantly you should be able to tell what role each modifier plays in order for your procedure codes to blend well together. Here are the most common modifiers used in multi-provider situations:

  • Modifier 62 (Two surgeons). Append this to each surgeon’s procedure when the physicians perform distinct, separate portions of the same procedure. Also referred to as co-surgery, modifier 62 applies when the skill of two surgeons (usually of different skills) is required in the management of a specific surgical procedure.
  • Choose between modifier 80 (Assistant surgeon), modifier 81 (Minimum assistant surgeon), and modifier 82 (Assistant surgeon [when qualified resident surgeon not available]) when one surgeon assists the other with multiple portions of the case rather than completing his work independently. What to look for? Make sure your physician indicates in his documentation that he’s working with an assistant surgeon, what the assistant surgeon did, and why he or she was used during the case.
  • Attach modifier AS

...

Comments Off on Multi-Provider Coding: Modifier 62 Can Save You $4k
February 15, 2011
Coder's Cranium / CPT 2011

Is 96413 + 96365 OK?

Coding is all about applying standardized code sets to situations that don’t always qualify as “standard.” The good news is that authoritative coding resources sometimes address even those encounters you don’t handle on a daily basis. Test your skills with these two scenarios and see whether your responses match the official rules.

Challenge 1: Staff administers a non-chemotherapy therapeutic drug via one IV infusion site, and then following oncologist orders based on protocol, administers chemotherapy intravenously via a second IV site. Should you report the chemotherapy admin or the non-chemotherapy admin as the initial code?

Solution 1: Challenge 1 presents a trick question. You should report initial codes for both the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy infusions.

CPT guidelines state, “When administering multiple infusions, injections or combinations, only one ‘initial’ service code should be reported, unless protocol requires that two separate IV sites must be used,” notes Gwen Davis, CPC, associate with Washington-based Derry, Nolan, and Associates.

Citing this same rule, Tracy Helget, CPC, in the business office of Medical Associates of Manhattan in Kansas, notes, “The easiest way to think of this is, if we are making more than one stick to the patient, we bill more than one initial code.”

Many payers indicate that when you report two initial codes because each requires a separate access site, you should append modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service). So you may need to append modifier 59 to the secondary “initial” code to indicate the separate IV sites for each infusion in this case. For example, your claim may include the following:

  • 96413 – Chemotherapy administration, intravenous infusion technique; up to 1 hour, single or initial substance/drug
  • 96365-59 – Intravenous infusion, for therapy, prophylaxis, or diagnosis (specify substance or drug); initial, up to 1 hour.

Challenge 2: Documentation indicates your oncologist participated in...

Comments Off on Is 96413 + 96365 OK?
February 4, 2011
Coder's Cranium

Report Picture Perfect Annual Wellness Visits With These 5 Tips

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) extended preventive coverage to more than 88 million patients covered by health insurance, and Medicare has codified that benefit in the form of an annual wellness visit. Medicare valued the new annual wellness codes based on a level 4, problem-oriented new and established E/M service. The two new codes are:

  • G0438 – Annual wellness visit; includes a personalized prevention plan of service (PPPS), first visit
  • G0439 – Annual wellness visit; includes a personalized prevention plan of service (PPPS), subsequent visit.

Tip 1: Apply G0438 to Second Year of Coverage

Be wary of applying these codes to new Medicare patients coming in to your physician’s practice in 2011.

The reason is that Medicare will only reimburse the initial visit (G0438) during the second year the patient is eligible for Medicare Part B. In other words, during the first year of the patient’s coverage, Medicare will only cover the Initial Preventive Physical Exam (IPPE), also known as the Welcome to Medicare exam.

Tip 2: CMS Limits G0438 to One Physician

If your FP sees the patient for the initial visit (G0438) and the patient sees a different physician for the next annual wellness visit, that second physician will only receive reimbursement for the subsequent visit (G0439), despite having never seen the patient before.

CMS has indicated that when a patient returns to the same or new physician in a third year, they might only pay for the subsequent visit, says Melanie Witt, RN, COBGC, MA, an independent coding consultant in Guadalupita, N.M. “It is therefore important that you convey this information to any new physician the patient sees.”

Tip 3: Add Preventive Service Codes, If Performed

You can bill the new annual visit codes in addition to any other preventive service, such as G0102 (Prostate cancer...

Comments Off on Report Picture Perfect Annual Wellness Visits With These 5 Tips
January 18, 2011
Coder's Cranium

Here’s How You Can Bill The Correct New G Code

If you find choosing the right G code for your claims difficult, help is at hand.

Starting Jan. 1, CMS is requiring eight new billing codes in addition to the existing six codes for home health agency services. Those include new nursing codes for RN management and evaluation of the plan of care (G0162), LPN or RN observation and assessment (G0163), and LPN or RN training and education (G0164). CMS is revising G0154 to cover only direct skilled care by an RN or LPN, CMS notes in Dec. 17 Transmittal No. 824 (CR 7182).

“We recognize that, in the course of a visit, a nurse or qualified therapist could likely provide more than one of the nursing or therapy services reflected in the new and revised codes,” CMS says.

But “HHAs must not report more than one G-code for the nursing visit regardless of the variety of nursing services provided during the visit.” The same goes for therapy.

“In cases where more than one nursing or therapy service is provided in a visit, the HHA must report the G-code which reflects the service for which the clinician spent most of his/her time,” CMS instructs. Hopefully this will ease providers’ concerns, voiced at the most recent home health Open Door Forum, about how to choose the right code.

“If direct skilled nursing services are provided, and the nurse also provides training/education of a patient or family member during that same visit, we would expect the HHA to report the G-code which reflects the service for which most of the time was spent during that visit,” CMS says in the transmittal. “Similarly, if a qualified therapist is performing a therapy service and also establishes a maintenance program during the same visit, the HHA should report the G-code which reflects...

Comments Off on Here’s How You Can Bill The Correct New G Code
January 3, 2011
Coder's Cranium

Steer Clear of MUE Denials With These Tips

If you’re receiving denials from Medicare, one possibility is that you’re running up against medically unlikely edits (MUEs). The edits, which are designed to prevent overpayments caused by gross billing errors, usually a result of clerical or billing systems’ mistakes, often confuse even veteran coders.

Ensure you’re not letting MUEs wreak havoc on your urology practice’s coding and reimbursement by uncovering the truth about four aspects of these edits.

While you shouldn’t stress too much, any practice filing a claim with Medicare should know what MUEs are and how they work.

“They limit the frequency a CPT code can be used,” says Chandra L. Hines, business office manager at Capital Urological Associates in Raleigh, N.C. “With our specialty of urology, we need to become aware of the denials and not let every denial go because the insurance company said it was an MUE. We should all be aware of MUEs as they occur, and we cannot always control whether or not we will receive payment.”

The MUE list includes specific CPT or HCPCS codes, followed by the number of units that CMS will pay. CMS developed the MUEs to reduce paid claims error rates in the Medicare Program, says Jillian Harrington, MHA, CPC, CPC-P, CPCI, CCS-P, president of ComplyCode in Binghamton, New York. “The first edits were implemented in January 2007, although the edits themselves became public in October 2008,” she adds.

Some MUEs deal with anatomical impossibilities while others edit automatically the number of units of service you can bill for a service in any 24-hour period. Still others limit codes according to CMS policy. For example, excision of a hydrocele, bilateral (55041) has a bilateral indicator of “2,” so you should never bill two or more units of this code. Additional edits focus on the nature of...

Comments Off on Steer Clear of MUE Denials With These Tips
December 20, 2010
Coder's Cranium

Pay Attention To These Revised Codes for Colon Motility and Manometric Studies

If you’ve been looking for a code on colon motility study and being frustrated for the lack of it, your search is over. CPT 2011 debuts a new code for a manometric study, along with two revised codes for esophageal pH monitoring.

For gastroenterology, you have a lot of changes to sort through — many involving deletions on low use codes or clean-up work.

Here’s How to Use New Manometric Study Codes

You should pay attention on two new codes for a manometric study: 91117 (Colon motility [manometric] study, minimum 6 hours continuous recording [including provocation tests, e.g., meal, intracolonic balloon distension, pharmacologic agents, if performed], with interpretation and report), and 91013 (Esophageal motility [manometric study of the esophagus and/or gastroesophageal junction] study with interpretation and report; with stimulation or perfusion during 2-dimensional data study [e.g., stimulant, acid or alkali perfusion] [List separately in addition to code for primary procedure]).

CPT 91117 is just for the study itself, not for the same session with catheter placement. The radiologist may place the catheter in a prior procedure and the gastroenterologist may come in and out to supervise the testing and any provocations that are performed. Thus, you should include the provocations in the study and report 97117 only once no matter how many times the testing is done.

You can use 91013 in cases like assessment of the effect on the measured esophageal motility when the patient’s esophagus is exposed to different stimulant liquids, says Michael Weinstein, MD, a gastroenterologist in Washington, D.C., and former member of the AMA’s CPT Advisory Panel. The code also applies when intravenous medications are administered to try to produce symptoms. CPT 91010 is included in 91013 and would not be billed separately, he adds.

Use 91034, 91035 in a New Way

Aside from debuting...

Comments Off on Pay Attention To These Revised Codes for Colon Motility and Manometric Studies
December 16, 2010