Toolkit

Wound Care: Refer to This Handy Chart to Make Graft Coding a Cinch

Careful: Skip over codes for legs and zero in on foot codes.

With the many graft options — including those taken from cadavers, pigs, and newborns — correctly coding a skin graft procedure can leave you guessing. Use this chart to narrow down the grafting field by matching definitions, product names, and treatment applications to CPT codes. Then, you’ll be sure to sail through coding your next graft claim.

Don’t miss: Nothing will get your claim denied faster than using a CPT code not linked to the diagnosis code. Thus, take care to avoid CPT codes for other body areas, such as the legs, which are generally listed above the code for the feet for each type of graft. Below, you will find only CPT codes that you can use to report grafts performed on feet.

Note: Be sure to periodically review the payer’s local coverage determination to ensure your office is in compliance for your state or region.

Remember: Site preparation, lesion excision, and supply (HCPCS) codes may also apply for these services (in addition to the above listed CPT codes). Look in future issues for more on coding skin graft services by subscribing to Podiatry Coding & Billing Alert. Editor: Stacie Borrello.

Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, Why That Wound Won’t Heal: Practical Tips to Get Wounds Moving, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Wound Care: Refer to This Handy Chart to Make Graft Coding a Cinch
May 27, 2010
Coding Challenge / pathology

Medical Coders: Focus on Fibroid Diagnosis

Find out why you should code the pathology exam of uterus with leiomyomas as 88307.

Question: When our pathologist diagnoses uterine fibroid tumors, what ICD-9 code should we use?

Pennsylvania Subscriber

Answer: You should choose the diagnosis based on the fibroid’s location:

  • Submucous fibroids (218.0, Submucous leiomyoma of uterus) grow from the uterine wall toward the uterine cavity. They are also called intracavitary fibroids.
  • Intramural fibroids (218.1, Intramural leiomyoma of uterus) grow within the uterine wall (myometrium). They are also called interstitial fibroids.
  • Subserous fibroids (218.2, Subserous leiomyoma of uterus) grow outward from the uterine wall toward the abdominal cavity. They are also called subperitoneal fibroids.
  • If the physician does not specify the uterine fibroid’s location, assign 218.9 (Leiomyoma of uterus, unspecified) as the diagnosis.

CPT alert: You should code the pathology exam of uterus with leiomyomas as 88307 (Level V — Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, uterus, with or without tubes and ovaries, other than neoplastic/prolapse).

Although ICD9 classifies leiomyoma as a benign neoplasm, a coding convention supported by the American Medical Association and the College of American Pathologists dictates that you code this condition as 88307, not 88309 (Level VI — Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, uterus, with or without tubes and ovaries, neoplastic).

For myomectomy specimens — fibroid tumors that the surgeon removes while leaving the uterus intact — bill the pathology exam as 88305 (Level IV — Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, leiomyoma[s], uterine myomectomy — without uterus).

@ Pathology/Lab Coding Alert. Editor: Ellen Garver, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live audio conference, Optimize Your Fibroid Coding and Billing: The Bottom-Line Basics for the Best Reimbursement, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Medical Coders: Focus on Fibroid Diagnosis
May 27, 2010
Cardiology / CMS / MAC / Provider News

MACs Differ on Response to CMS’s Cardiology Payment Adjustments

Don’t look for a raise just yet, in most cases.

CMS may talk, but MACs don’t always listen — at least not quickly.

As we told you in last week’s Insider, CMS recently corrected several “technical errors” published in the 2010 Fee Schedule, and thanks to these corrections, Medicare will increase payment for several cardiology-related testing codes, including codes 75571-75574 (Heart CT) and 78451-78454 (Heart muscle SPECT imaging).

Although many practices are eager to see the payment boosts in their next Medicare payments, that may be an overly ambitious goal at this point.

“I inquired with a few MAC carriers such as Trailblazer, Noridian, and Palmetto, and was told different things by different Medicare payers,” says Terry Fletcher, BS, CPC, CCS-P, CCS, CMSCS, CCC, CEMS, CMS, CEO of Terry Fletcher Consulting Inc.

“One did not even know there was a change,” she says. “Next, Noridian said that they will be making the adjustments when they get the directive from CMS. And Palmetto said they would need the provider to contact them and then batch retroactive to January the myocardial perfusion imaging claims and send a letter to request the increase,” she says.

Bottom line: Until CMS provides a clear answer to the MACs regarding when they must implement the changes, you may not see your pay increases, but keep an eye on your carrier’s Web site for information on when it intends to reprocess claims using the new rates.

@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, You Can Use the Appeals Process Like a Pro, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on MACs Differ on Response to CMS’s Cardiology Payment Adjustments
May 27, 2010
Coding Challenge

Cardio Coders: Discover Disconnect Date’s Proper Place

Tip: You need to know the hook-up date and disconnect day.

Question: Which date(s) of service should I report for 30-day cardiac event monitoring?

Washington Subscriber

Answer: For Noridian Medicare, your Part B administrator for Washington, you’ll need to know both (1) the date the staff hooked up the patient and (2) the day they disconnected the patient. But knowing which dates to report is only half the battle — you also need to know where to report them.

When you’re reporting 30-day cardiac event monitoring, Noridian requires providers to report the hook-up date as the “from” date and the disconnect date as the “through” date in Item 19 of the CMS-1500 (or its electronic equivalent).

Watch out: You should report only the “from” date (that is, the hook-up date) in Item 24A (or its electronic equivalent), Noridian instructs. You should not report the “through” (disconnect) date in 24A because if you have dates spanning two months and only a single unit, “the system inappropriately suspends the claim and asks the provider for clarification,” Noridian states.

The codes for 30-day monitoring include 93268-93272 (Wearable patient activated electrocardiographic rhythm derived event recording with presymptom memory loop, 24-hour attended monitoring, per 30 day period of time …) and 93012-93014 (Telephonic transmission of post-symptom electrocardiogram rhythm strip[s], 24-hour attended monitoring, per 30 day period of time).

Or if the “monitoring service meets the definition of the new 30-day cardiovascular telemetry service,” look to 93228-93229 (Wearable mobile cardiovascular telemetry with electrocardiographic recording, concurrent computerized real time data analysis and greater than 24 hours of accessible ECG data storage [retrievable with query] with ECG triggered and patient selected events transmitted to a remote attended surveillance center for up to 30 days …), Noridian states.

Learn more: You can read more from...

Comments Off on Cardio Coders: Discover Disconnect Date’s Proper Place
May 25, 2010
CCI / Medicare / NCCI / Provider News

2 Reasons to Think Twice Before Reporting 78070 With 78803

Sometimes CCI compliance requires looking beyond the edit pairs.

Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits don’t bundle SPECT (78803) and planar (78070) parathyroid imaging codes, but coding experts often tell you not to code the two together for SPECT and planar parathyroid imaging on the same date.

Add some method to this madness by looking at the information offered by two coding resources, the Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM) and the NCCI Policy Manual for Medicare Services (CCI Manual).

1. SNM Singles Out 78803

SNM’s online Practice Management Coding Corner features a Q&A that recommends reporting 78070 (Parathyroid imaging) for planar imaging alone, but 78803 (Radiopharmaceutical localization of tumor or distribution of radiopharmaceutical agent[s]; tomographic) for parathyroid SPECT imaging with or without planar, says Jackie Miller, RHIA, CCS-P, CPC, vice president of product development for Coding Metrix Inc. in Powder Springs, Ga.

Support: “Choose the single code that describes the protocol and procedure performed,” states the Q&A, located at http://interactive.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=2442&RPID=1995. SNM “would NOT recommend coding both CPT codes,” the article notes.

2. CCI Makes the Case for SPECT Code

Although there is notyou won’t find any a specific edit bundling 78070 and 78803, CCI does address the SPECT/planar issue in the CCI Manual, says Miller.

CCI Manual, Chapter 9, Section E.2, explains that you may not report a SPECT study and planar study of the same limited area because “Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies represent an enhanced methodology over standard planar nuclear imaging. When a limited anatomic area is studied, there is no additional information procured by obtaining both planar and SPECT studies.”

Bonus tip: The manual indicates you may report both planar and SPECT codes only when the size of the scanned area makes both sets necessary, such as with whole body bone scans with...

Comments Off on 2 Reasons to Think Twice Before Reporting 78070 With 78803
May 25, 2010
Hot Coding Topics / Medicare

Examine These FAQ to Sort Your Medicare Cancer Screen Codes

Remember frequency rules differ for average, high risk.

Getting Medicare to pony up for colorectal cancer screenings is not difficult provided you follow its frequency guidelines and eligibility requirements to the letter. A coding slip up on one of these items will knock you out of the saddle, and Medicare won’t accept the claim at all.

Rope in all the coding info you’ll need via this Medicare colorectal cancer screening FAQ.

Who’s Eligible for Average-Risk Test?

If the Medicare patient is 50-plus years old, he is eligible for a covered Medicare screening, confirms Dena Rumisek, CPC, biller at Michigan’s Grand River Gastroenterology PC.

However: These patients are considered average risk, and can have a colorectal cancer screening only once every 10 years, says Cheryl Ray, CCS, CPMA, of Atlantic Gastroenterology in Greenville, N.C. Ignore Medicare’s frequency guidelines at your peril, experts warn.

“Medicare is very stringent on the date … it has to be 10 years or longer — it can’t be 9 years and 360 days,” between covered screening colonoscopies, assures Rumisek.

Example: A 68-year-old established Medicare patient reports for a screening colonoscopy on Dec. 5, 2009. The patient’s records indicate that he last had a covered screening on Sept. 15, 1998. On the claim, you should report G0121 (Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy on individual not meeting criteria for high risk).

What ICD-9 Codes Are In Play for G0121?

Just one, provided there is no need for any therapeutic intervention during the colonoscopy. Medicare requires V76.51 (Special screening for malignant neoplasms; colon) on all G0121 claims. You might list other identified conditions secondarily, including diverticulosis (562.10) or hemorrhoids (455.0).

Always list the V code first for an average-risk screening, however.

What if the Patient Had a Recent Flexible Sig?

The frequency rules differ depending on whether other related...

Comments Off on Examine These FAQ to Sort Your Medicare Cancer Screen Codes
May 25, 2010
Coding Challenge / E/M / modifier 25 / modifier 26 / radiology

Use 3 CPT, Modifier, and ICD-9 Code Pairs to Ace This X-Ray Claim

Decipher why you should include a seconding diagnosis.

Question: A 38-year-old patient presents to the emergency room with complaints of wheezing, coughing, and trouble catching her breath. After the nonphysician practitioner (NPP) performs a problem-focused history, the physician performs a detailed history and exam and discovers focal ronchi. The physician orders a two-view chest x-ray to check for upper respiratory infection (URI) The chest x-ray results reveal acute URI, and the ronchi clears up upon reevaluation. The patient is treated with antibiotics. How should I code this scenario?

Answer:You’ll submit two of each for this claim: CPT codes, modifiers,and ICD-9 codes. On the claim, report the following:

  • 71020 (Radiologic examination, chest, 2 views, frontal and lateral) for the x-ray
  • Modifier 26 (Professional component) appended 71020 to show that you are coding for the physician’s services only
  • 99284 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires these 3 key components: A detailed history; A detailed examination;and Medical decision making of moderate complexity….) for the E/M
  • Modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service) appended to 99284 show that the E/M and the x-rays were separate services
  • 465.9 (Acute upper respiratory infections of multiple or unspecified sites; unspecified site) appended to 71020 and 99284 to represent the patient’s URI
  • 786.7 (Symptoms involving respiratory system and other chest symptoms; abnormal chest sounds) appended to 71020 and 99284 to represent the patient’s focal ronchi.

Secondary Dx decoded: Even though the focal ronchi cleared up on reexamination, you should still include 786.7 on the claim. It will help paint a more lucid portrait of the patient’s condition, and can only strengthen your medical necessity case for the chest-x-ray.

@ Part B Insider. Editor:...

Comments Off on Use 3 CPT, Modifier, and ICD-9 Code Pairs to Ace This X-Ray Claim
May 24, 2010
Audit / CMS / Oig / RAC / Toolkit

Recovery Audit Contractors: Know These RAC Fast Facts

RACs are just another tool in the government’s arsenal to collect improper payments.

You’ve got so many compliance acronyms flying at you every day that you may not be able to differentiate your RAC from the OIG. Know these quick facts about RACs to stay better informed.

  • Recovery audit contractors (RACs) detect and correct past improper payments so CMS and the MACs can prevent such problems in the future
  • RACs are hired as contractors by the government, and they can can collect “contingency fees,” which means that they get a percentage of the amount that they recover from providers who were paid inappropriately The maximum RAC lookback period is three years, and they cannot review claims paid prior to Oct. 1, 2007
  • Between 2005 and 2008, RACs involved in the original demonstration project recovered over $1.03 billion in Medicare improper payments, but referred only two cases of potential fraud to CMS, according to a February OIG report on the topic, which noted that “because RACs do not receive their contingency fees for cases they refer that are determined to be fraud, there may be a disincentive for RACs to refer potential cases of fraud.”
  • Unlike RACs, the OIG is a government entity. Although the OIG also performs reviews and audits and seeks improper payments, the OIG does not collect contingency fees.

For more on the RAC program, visit www.cms.gov/rac.

@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, You Can Use the Appeals Process Like a Pro, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Recovery Audit Contractors: Know These RAC Fast Facts
May 24, 2010
Medicare / Oig / Provider News

Cost of Freezing Conversion Factor is Over $6 Billion — Just for 2010

Plus: The OIG recovered over $1.5 billion in fiscal year 2009, and is on the lookout to collect more.

With less than two weeks to go before Medicare payments once again threaten to decrease by 21 percent, a new report sheds light on the financial outcome of Congressional actions.

Although the 2010 Physician Fee Schedule originally included a conversion factor that would have been 21 percent lower than the 2009 level, practices haven’t felt that cut yet this year,because legislators have voted several times to freeze payments, which now use the conversion factor of $36.0791. That freeze will expire on May 31, after which your Medicare payments will drop considerably unless Congress steps in once more.

However, one government entity’s calculations show that the freeze is costly. According to a May 7 Congressional Budget Office report, freezing payments at the current levels for the rest of 2010 would cost the government… … $6.5 billion. The AMA has turned up the heat on Congress to replace the current payment method, releasing a print ad aimed at Congress to demonstrate that “more delays of permanent reform now increase the cost for taxpayers,” and that the association “calls on Congress to fix the flawed Medicare physician payment formula now.”

Congress has not yet introduced a bill to extend the payment freeze past May 31. Keep an eye on the Insider for more information as this story develops.

To read the Congressional Budget Office’s calculation sheet,visit www.cbo.gov/budget/factsheets/2010b/SGR-menu.pdf.

@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming on-demand Webinar, 5 Steps to Optimize Your Office’s Coding & Billing Practices, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Cost of Freezing Conversion Factor is Over $6 Billion — Just for 2010
May 24, 2010
CCI / modifier 59 / Provider News

Make Sure You’re Applying Massive Prostate Biopsy, Urethral Dilation Bundlings

Modifier 59 sometimes will rescue your reimbursement.

Just when you’re finally getting a handle on all the 2010 coding changes, here comes round two of the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits. Version 16.1, which took effect April 1, will tie your hands when coding many common urology procedures, including prostate biopsies and urethral dilations.

Heads up: CCI 16.1 includes 2,054 new active pairs and 1,947 modifier changes, says Frank D. Cohen, MPA, MBB, senior analyst with MIT Solutions Inc. in Clearwater, Fla.

“For urology, there will be 78 edit pair additions and two edit pair deletions,” says Michael A. Ferragamo, MD, FACS, clinical assistant professor of urology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook.To ensure you get paid appropriately for your urologist’s services this quarter, here’s the rundown of the most important changes.

Say Goodbye to Biopsy with Several Prostate Procedures

You can no longer report prostate biopsy codes 55700 (Biopsy, prostate; needle or punch, single or multiple, any approach) or 55706 (Biopsies, prostate, needle, transperineal, stereotactic template guided saturation sampling, including imaging guidance) with 52630 (Transurethral resection; residual or re-growth of obstructive prostate tissue including control of postoperative bleeding, complete [vasectomy, meatotomy, cystourethroscopy, urethral calibration and/or dilation, and internal urethrotomy are included]). Your payer will reimburse you for 52630 but deny the biopsy codes, and you cannot use a modifier to separate these new edits.

“I have a major issue with the bundling of 55700 and 52630,” laments Alice Kater, CPC, PCS, coder for Urology Associates of South Bend, Ind. Kater says her urologists perform a good number of prostate biopsies transrectally and 55700 is what she uses because the descriptor says “any approach.” When you are performing two separate procedures utilizing two different approaches, how can they be bundled?”

Silver lining: CCI also bundles...

Comments Off on Make Sure You’re Applying Massive Prostate Biopsy, Urethral Dilation Bundlings
May 20, 2010
Coding Challenge / modifier 26

Hip Injection With Fluoro — Is Coding Both Allowed?

You have two options depending on how the physician performed the procedure.

Question: Our orthopedist administered a hip injection under fluoroscopy. Can I report both codes?

Wyoming Subscriber

Answer: You can code both the injection and fluoroscopy, but the correct choices depend on how your physician completed the procedure.

Option 1: If your orthopedist injected radiopaque dye and performed the arthrography concurrently, code the procedure with 27093 (Injection procedure for hip arthrography; without anesthesia).

Option 2: If he completed the guidance and injection as separate procedures, submit 20610 (Arthrocentesis, aspiration, and/or injection; major joint or bursa [e.g., shoulder, hip, knee joint, subacromial bursa]) for the injection. Include 77002 (Fluoroscopic guidance for needle placement [e.g., biopsy, aspiration, injection, localization device]) for the fluoroscopic guidance.

Remember to append modifier 26 (Professional component) to 77002 because your physician performed the service but doesn’t own the fluoroscopy equipment.

SI change: If the physician injects the sacroiliac joint instead of the hip joint, choose either 20610 (Arthrocentesis, aspiration, and/or injection; major joint or bursa [e.g., shoulder, hip, knee joint, subacromial bursa]) or 27096 (Injection procedure for sacroiliac joint, arthrography and/or anesthetic/steroid).

@ Orthopedic Coding Alert. Editor: Leigh DeLozier, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live audio conference, Coding Tips for Hip Procedures, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Hip Injection With Fluoro — Is Coding Both Allowed?
May 20, 2010
CCI / NCCI / Provider News

Avoid Denials With This Lowdown on Newborn CCI Bundles

These edits took effect April 1, so start observing them yesterday.

The latest version of the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) has an edit that family practice coders should note – especially if the practice treats newborn patients.

Get to know the new CCI 16.1 edit and get ready to observe it with this expert breakdown. Check Column 1 on These Hospital E/Ms According to CCI 16.1, these codes are in column 1 of the mutually exclusive edits:

  • 99231 (Subsequent hospital care, per day, for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires at least 2 of these 3 key components: a problem focused interval history; a problem focused examination; medical decision making that is straightforward or of low complexity …)
  • 99232 (… an expanded problem focused interval history; an expanded problem focused examination; medical decision making of moderate complexity …)
  • 99233 (… a detailed interval history; a detailed examination; medical decision making of high complexity …).

Column 2 of these edits includes these codes:

  • 99460 (Initial hospital or birthing center care, per day,for evaluation and management of normal newborn infant)
  • 99461 (Initial care, per day, for evaluation and management of normal newborn infant seen in other than hospital or birthing center)
  • 99462 (Subsequent hospital care, per day. for evaluation and management of normal newborn).

Translation: An FP may not report both normal newborn care and subsequent hospital care for a newborn on the same date of service. If the FP performs normal newborn services (99460-99462) on the same date that the newborn later becomes ill and receives subsequent hospital care (99231-99233), you should only report a code from the 99231-99233 code set, explains Kent Moore, manager of health care financing and delivery systems for the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) in Leawood, Kan.

The...

Comments Off on Avoid Denials With This Lowdown on Newborn CCI Bundles
May 20, 2010
Coding Challenge / CPT / surgery

Surgical Coders: Don’t Overstate Debridement

Tip: This encounter involves topical applications and patient care instruction in addition to removing devitalized tissue.

Question: When the surgeon performs a wound VAC or cleans a wound by scraping with a sharp curette (not excising tissue), is it appropriate to use a debridement code or should we report an active wound care management code from the range 97597-97606?

Ohio Subscriber

Answer: Physicians typically use the debridement codes (11000-11001, Debridement of extensive eczematous or infected skin; … or 11004-11005, Debridement of skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle and fascia for necrotizing soft tissue infection; …) for debridement by any method.

Without...

Comments Off on Surgical Coders: Don’t Overstate Debridement
May 20, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

Ace CPT and ICD-9 Coding for Intra-Arterial Cases

Whether liver neoplasm is primary or secondary will change your coding.

Good news: You can apply many of the same rules you already know for intravenous chemotherapy coding to intra-arterial coding, too. So take your chemo coding expertise to the next level by adding intra-arterial skills to your arsenal.

Start here: For intra-arterial (IA) chemotherapy, you should choose from the following codes, says Gwen Davis, CPC, associate with Washington-based Derry, Nolan, and Associates.

  • 96420 — Chemotherapy administration, intra-arterial; push technique
  • 96422 — … infusion technique, up to 1 hour
  • +96423 — … infusion technique, each additional hour, (List separately

...

Comments Off on Ace CPT and ICD-9 Coding for Intra-Arterial Cases
May 20, 2010
Coding Challenge

Medical Coders: Don’t Let Shorthand Block You From Correct Code

If you have a question, be sure to ask your physician.

Question: A patient reports to the ER at 8 a.m. on a Sunday morning. He reports a horrible toothache that started on Friday; he says he planned to “tough it out” over the weekend and see his dentist Monday, but the pain was too severe; he reports 10 on a 10-point pain scale. The ER physician performs an “inf. Aveo block,” according to the notes. What condition do the notes reflect, and how should I code this scenario?

Massachusetts Subscriber

Answer: You should double-check with the physician before filing...

Comments Off on Medical Coders: Don’t Let Shorthand Block You From Correct Code
May 18, 2010
Coder's Cranium / ICD-9

Avoid CVA Diagnosis Coding Pitfalls with 438.13, 438.14

You’ll turn to a V code when your neurologist reports ‘no effects,’ however.

When your neurologist sees a patient who had a stroke, either recently or in the distant past, he may record a number of different conditions — which makes your job more difficult. If you remember a few guidelines, you’ll select the proper ICD-9 codes for every cerebrovascular accident (CVA) case your neurologist treats.

Get Specific With 2 CVA Diagnosis Codes

When your neurologist sees a patient who has had a stroke, or CVA, he may document multiple deficiencies, both new and lingering. When the patient presents with...

Comments Off on Avoid CVA Diagnosis Coding Pitfalls with 438.13, 438.14
May 16, 2010