ICD-10: Prep Yourself for New Hyperlipidemia Codes

When ICD-10 goes into effect in 2013, high cholesterol will still be a challenge for your patients. Here’s a look at how coding for this, and similar diagnoses, compares between ICD-9 and ICD-10.

ICD-9-CM Codes:

  • 272.0, Pure hypercholesterolemia
  • 272.1, Pure hyperglyceridemia
  • 272.2, Mixed hyperlipidemia
  • 272.4, Other and unspecified hyperlipidemia

ICD-10 Codes:

  • E78.0, Pure hypercholesterolemia
  • E78.1, Pure hyperglyceridemia
  • E78.2, Mixed hyperlipidemia
  • E78.4, Other hyperlipidemia
  • E78.5, Hyperlipidemia, unspecified

Change: ICD-10 offers a one-to-one code match with ICD-9 for pure hypercholesterolemia (272.0, E78.0), pure hyperglyceridemia (272.1, E78.1), and mixed hyperlipidemia (272.2, E78.2). But where ICD-9 offers one code for “other and unspecified hyperlipidemia” (272.4), ICD-10 offers one code for “other” (E78.4) and a different code for “unspecified” (E78.5).

Documentation: Your clinicians’ documentation shouldn’t need to change from its current form. All you need to do as a coder to capture this already present information is to format your superbill to capture the difference between “other” and “unspecified” hyperlipidemia. “Other” means the physician documented the type, but ICD-10 doesn’t offer a code specific to the documented type. “Unspecified” means the physician did not document the type of hyperlipidemia.

Bonus tip: The notes with the ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for lipid metabolism disorders are very similar, but there are a few differences. For example, while 272.1 includes “hypertriglyceridemia, essential,” E78.1 includes “elevated fasting triglycerides.”

Under E78.2, ICD-10 adds “combined hyperlipidemia NOS,” “elevated cholesterol with elevated triglycerides NEC,” and “Hyperlipidemia, group C.” Code E78.2 also has an Excludes1 note, telling you instead to code E78.4 for “familial combined hyperlipidemia” and E78.5 for “cerebrotendinous cholesterosis [van Bogaert-Scherer- Epstein] (E75.5).”

Remember: When ICD-10 goes into effect on Oct. 1, 2013, you should apply the code set and official guidelines in effect for the date of service reported. Learn more at www.cms.gov/ICD10/ and...

Comments Off on ICD-10: Prep Yourself for New Hyperlipidemia Codes

2 Reasons to Think Twice Before Reporting 78070 With 78803

Sometimes CCI compliance requires looking beyond the edit pairs.

Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits don’t bundle SPECT (78803) and planar (78070) parathyroid imaging codes, but coding experts often tell you not to code the two together for SPECT and planar parathyroid imaging on the same date.

Add some method to this madness by looking at the information offered by two coding resources, the Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM) and the NCCI Policy Manual for Medicare Services (CCI Manual).

1. SNM Singles Out 78803

SNM’s online Practice Management Coding Corner features a Q&A that recommends reporting 78070 (Parathyroid imaging) for planar imaging alone, but 78803 (Radiopharmaceutical localization of tumor or distribution of radiopharmaceutical agent[s]; tomographic) for parathyroid SPECT imaging with or without planar, says Jackie Miller, RHIA, CCS-P, CPC, vice president of product development for Coding Metrix Inc. in Powder Springs, Ga.

Support: “Choose the single code that describes the protocol and procedure performed,” states the Q&A, located at http://interactive.snm.org/index.cfm?PageID=2442&RPID=1995. SNM “would NOT recommend coding both CPT codes,” the article notes.

2. CCI Makes the Case for SPECT Code

Although there is notyou won’t find any a specific edit bundling 78070 and 78803, CCI does address the SPECT/planar issue in the CCI Manual, says Miller.

CCI Manual, Chapter 9, Section E.2, explains that you may not report a SPECT study and planar study of the same limited area because “Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies represent an enhanced methodology over standard planar nuclear imaging. When a limited anatomic area is studied, there is no additional information procured by obtaining both planar and SPECT studies.”

Bonus tip: The manual indicates you may report both planar and SPECT codes only when the size of the scanned area makes both sets necessary, such as with whole body bone scans with...

Comments Off on 2 Reasons to Think Twice Before Reporting 78070 With 78803

Cardiology Coding Question: Separate Reporting for 37204

Question: Should I separately report right and left bronchial artery embolization? Answer: You should report 37204 (Transcatheter occlusion or embolization [e.g., for tumor destruction, to achieve hemostasis, to occlude a vascular malformation], percutaneous, any method, non-central nervous system, non-head or neck) twice for right and left lung embolization at the same encounter. In addition, if the cardiologist [...] Related articles:

  1. Cardiology Coding Education: Pacemaker Lead Check Question: The cardiologist documented testing pacemaker leads using fluoroscopy...
  2. 2 New 2010 CPT Codes for High-Tech Cardiology ServicesSteer clear of Cat. I codes for intravascular spectroscopy — here’s...
  3. OB or Not OB: That’s the Ultrasound Coding QuestionQuestion: For an ultrasound, the radiologist documented measurements of the uterus,...

Comments Off on Cardiology Coding Question: Separate Reporting for 37204

Radiology Coding Education: Is 76705 OK for Back?

Question: For a lower back ultrasound of a soft tissue mass, which CPT code is appropriate? Answer: Code 76705 (Ultrasound, abdominal, real time with image documentation; limited [e.g., single organ, quadrant, follow-up]) is appropriate for this lower back ultrasound. Although the code descriptor states “abdominal” and not “back,” CPT Assistant (May 2009) clarifies that 76705 is appropriate [...] Related articles:

  1. New From CPT Assistant: Help with Trunk Ultrasound Coding Do you know exactly what’s in the mediastinum? Your US...
  2. Double Ultrasound Codes Spell Double Trouble With AuditorsAuthorities scrutinize medical necessity for 76830 & 76856. The OIG...
  3. 5 Lessons Radiology Coders Should Learn From CCI 15.3Wonder if there’s a method to the 76001 madness? Here’s...

Comments Off on Radiology Coding Education: Is 76705 OK for Back?