Q: Since April 1, our clearinghouse has been rejecting claims with NTIOL Q1003. We understand that no additional reimbursement was to be received after the expiration date of Feb. 26,…
Even if you don’t have prescribing privileges, you can rest assured now as CMS will not cut your pay as a penalty for failing to comply with the new e-prescribing incentive program.
As you are probably aware, starting in 2012, you may be subject to a one percent payment adjustment on your Part B pay if you don’t successfully participate in e-prescribing this year. In 2013, that payment adjustment will go up to 1.5 percent, and in 2014 it will rise to two percent, CMS’s Daniel Green, MD noted on a Feb. 15 CMS-sponsored call.
“To earn an incentive in 2011, an eligible professional must e-prescribe 25 times during the year, ten of which must be in the first six months,” Green said. “If they are a successful e-prescriber during the calendar year, they not only would avoid the 2012 payment adjustment, they would get a one percent 2011 payment incentive, and they would be exempt from the 2013 payment adjustment,” he explained.
“Earning an incentive in 2011 does not necessarily exempt the eligible professional or group practice from a payment adjustment in 2012,” Green explained.
How to Avoid the Adjustment
CMS reps said that they’ve been flooded with calls about the 2012 payment adjustment, and described ways that you can avoid the adjustment if you qualify.
Not eligible to prescribe: If you are not a physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant between Jan. 1 and June 30, 2011, you can avoid the e-prescribing penalty. In addition, if you don’t have prescribing privileges at least once on a claim between Jan. 1 and June 30, 2011, you should append G8644 (Eligible professional does not have prescribing privileges) at least once before June 30 to ensure that your MAC knows you are not subject to the penalty, said CMS’s Michelle...
As per the latest CMS regulation, all claims with modifier GZ appended will be denied straight away. It is not unusual even in the best-run medical practices that the physician performs a noncovered service and doesn’t get an ABN signed. If you shoul...
ICD-9 2011 and ICD-10 2011 both have coding options for a malignant neoplasm of the main bronchus. Both indicate that the codes are appropriate for malignant neoplasms of the carina or hilus of lung. What’s different: ICD-9 2011 includes simply 162.2...
Question: I’m receiving contradictory guidance on which modifier to use when a gastroenterologist does an incomplete colonoscopy. Should I use modifier 52 or 53? Answer: CPT 2011 ends the days of arguing over whether to use modifier 52 or 53 for ...
Medicare still won’t reimburse audiologist-billed Epley. After two years of battles with CMS over canalith repositioning procedure (CRP) coding, physicians will finally get paid for these specific codes. CPT® 2009 excited ENT coders with new CPT cod...
All that fine green print on time in your E/M CPT 2011 manual boils down to one thing: you can round to the closest time code. But that advice from CPT contradicts Medicare’s threshold time guideline. CPT Treats Times as Averages CPT 2011 indicates...
Forget about digging through the latest Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and calculating the conversion factor when it comes to determining your Part B reimbursement rate for flu shots. CMS has come out with a handy MLN Matters article explaining this i...
Get ready for another year of nail-biting to find out if your Medicare payments will be slashed. “The calendar year 2011 Physician Fee Schedule conversion factor is $25.5217,” notes the 2011 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule, printed in th...
The National Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) version 16.3 instructions align MTWA and stress tests coding manual guidelines with version 16.2 edit deletions.
Update Chapter 11 of Your CCI Manual
The CCI version effective July 1 deleted the edits that barred reporting cardiovascular stress test codes 93015-93017 (Cardiovascular stress test using maximal or submaximal treadmill or bicycle exercise, continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, and/or pharmacological stress …) with MTWA code 93025 (Microvolt T-wave alternans for assessment of ventricular arrhythmias).
The manual in effect at that time, however, stated you couldn’t report 93015-93017 on the same date as 93025. The previous wording said, “If a physician performs an MTWA with submaximal stress test followed by a traditional stress test on the same date of service, CMS payment policy allows separate payment of MTWA (CPT code 93025) and the interpretation and report for the traditional stress test (CPT code 93018). The practice expense component of the traditional stress test is not separately payable, and a physician should not report CPT codes 93015-93017 on the same date of service as CPT code 93025.”
CCI’s updates present in the current manual, version 16.3, reflect the CCI edit deletion that allows you to report both an MTWA with submaximal stress test and a traditional stress test, acknowledging that the tests are different. The current wording says, “Microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) (CPT code 93025) testing requires a submaximal stress test that differs from the traditional exercise stress test (CPT codes 93015-93018) which utilizes a standard exercise protocol. CPT codes 93015-93018 should not be reported separately for the submaximal stress test integral to MTWA testing. If a physician performs an MTWA with submaximal stress test followed by a period of rest and then a traditional stress test on the same date of service, both the MTWA and traditional...
Double check POS 11 shouldn’t be 22 — or 24. Entering your place-of-service (POS) number on your claim form may seem routine, but a recent OIG audit found that practices are not giving POS numbers the care they deserve. Based on a r...
Plus: CMS has proposed freezing the ICD-9 codeset after next year.
If you were hoping that the Oct. 1, 2013 ICD-10 implementation date wasn’t set in stone, you are out of luck. That’s the word from CMS during a June 15 CMS Open Door Forum entitled “ICD-10 Implementation in a 5010 Environment.”
“There will be no delays on this implementation period, and no grace period,” said Pat Brooks, RHIA, with CMS’s Hospital and Ambulatory Policy Group, during the call. “A number of you have contacted us about rumors you’ve heard about postponement of that date or changes to that date, but I can assure you that that is a firm implementation date,” she stressed.
Brooks indicated that the rumor about a potential delay in the implementation date continues to persist throughout the physician community, and recommended that practice managers alert their physicians to the fact that that the rumor is untrue.
The Oct. 1, 2013 date will be in effect for both inpatient and outpatient services. Keep in mind that the ICD-10 implementation will have no impact on CPT and HCPCS coding, Brooks said. You will still continue to bill your CPT and HCPCS procedure codes as before.
You’ll Find Nearly 55,000 Additional Codes
Currently, CMS publishes about 14,000 ICD-9 codes, but there are over 69,000 ICD-10 codes. The additional codes will allow you to provide greater detail in describing diagnoses and procedures, Brooks said.
If you’re wondering which specific codes ICD-10 includes for your specialty, you can check out the entire 2010 ICD-10 codeset, which CMS has posted on its Web site. “Later this year, we’ll be posting the 2011 update,” Brooks said during the call.
@ For more details on CMS’ upcoming plans, subscribe to Part B Insider (Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC).
Sign...
Don’t look for a raise just yet, in most cases.
CMS may talk, but MACs don’t always listen — at least not quickly.
As we told you in last week’s Insider, CMS recently corrected several “technical errors” published in the 2010 Fee Schedule, and thanks to these corrections, Medicare will increase payment for several cardiology-related testing codes, including codes 75571-75574 (Heart CT) and 78451-78454 (Heart muscle SPECT imaging).
Although many practices are eager to see the payment boosts in their next Medicare payments, that may be an overly ambitious goal at this point.
“I inquired with a few MAC carriers such as Trailblazer, Noridian, and Palmetto, and was told different things by different Medicare payers,” says Terry Fletcher, BS, CPC, CCS-P, CCS, CMSCS, CCC, CEMS, CMS, CEO of Terry Fletcher Consulting Inc.
“One did not even know there was a change,” she says. “Next, Noridian said that they will be making the adjustments when they get the directive from CMS. And Palmetto said they would need the provider to contact them and then batch retroactive to January the myocardial perfusion imaging claims and send a letter to request the increase,” she says.
Bottom line: Until CMS provides a clear answer to the MACs regarding when they must implement the changes, you may not see your pay increases, but keep an eye on your carrier’s Web site for information on when it intends to reprocess claims using the new rates.
@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC
Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, You Can Use the Appeals Process Like a Pro, or order the CD/transcripts.
Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.
RACs are just another tool in the government’s arsenal to collect improper payments.
You’ve got so many compliance acronyms flying at you every day that you may not be able to differentiate your RAC from the OIG. Know these quick facts about RACs to stay better informed.
For more on the RAC program, visit www.cms.gov/rac.
@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC
Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, You Can Use the Appeals Process Like a Pro, or order the CD/transcripts.
Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.
If you performed a consult in 2006, the auditor will use 2006 guidelines — not today’s rules.
Most Part B practices have grown accustomed to tucking consult regulations into the backs of their minds, since Medicare no longer pays for...
Before using modifier Q6 for a non-Medicare patient, check with the commercial payer — here’s why.
Question: We hired a locum tenens for two weeks. Do we code the same for the replacement physician as for a full-time...