Question: In the CMS DRG datasheet, what is the difference between the column titled “Geometric Mean LOS” and the one labeled “Arithmetic Mean LOS”? Answer: The geometric mean length of stay or (GMLOS) is the national mean length of stay for ea...
Question: I’m looking for the anesthesia code for a tympanostomy of the left ear, performed on a 10-month-old child. What’s the correct choice? Answer: The correct code is 00126 (Anesthesia for procedures on external, middle, and inner ear includin...
Hang on to your claims for these wound care management codes.
As most veteran coders know, you can’t report an add-on code unless you report it along with its “parent code” on the same claim. But an NCCI glitch has made it impossible for you to collect for both the debridement add-on code 97598 and its partner code 97597 — creating denied claims and confusion for practices that perform active wound care management. However, a new announcement indicating that the NCCI is fixing the problem should ease your coding angst.
The American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) issued a release on its Web site stating that the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits currently bundle the following two codes together:
97597 — Debridement (eg, high pressure waterjet with/without suction, sharp selective debridement with scissors, scalpel and forceps), open wound, (eg, fibrin, devitalized epidermis and/or dermis, exudate, debris, biofilm), including topical application(s), wound assessment, use of a whirlpool, when performed and instruction(s) for ongoing care, per session, total wound(s) surface area; first 20 sq cm or less
+97598 — …each additional 20 sq cm, or part thereof (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure)
This edit bundle has an indicator of “0,” meaning that no modifier can separate these codes. Fortunately, the APMA caught the error and contacted the NCCI director about it.
“The NCCI is currently working on a solution and recommends that APMA members delay submission of claims reporting combination of CPT 97597 and CPT 97598 until the NCCI replacement file is in place and implemented by CMS,” the APMA’s statement says. “The April 1, 2011 version of NCCI does not contain this edit error.”
The APMA has not yet gotten word on whether Medicare contractors will automatically reprocess claims that were paid in error...
Level-four and level-five office visits are not unusual in a urology practice, but failing to incorrectly match the history, exam, and medical decision-making (MDM) can make you miss out on the higher level codes you could report.
The third element for the historical portion of an E/M service, after the chief complaint (CC) and the history of the present illness (HPI), is the review of systems (ROS) — this portion of the E/M service trips up many coders because often they must select a lower code simply because the provider didn’t document pertinent negative responses or inappropriately used the statement “all systems negative.”
Ensure you’re properly counting your urologist’s ROS with this primer to guarantee you’re not overcoding or undercoding his E/M services.
“The review of systems is a subjective account of a patient’s current and or past experiences with illnesses and or injuries affecting any of the 14 applicable organ systems,” explains Nicole Martin, CPC, manager of the medical practice management section of the Medical Society in New Jersey in Lawrenceville.
You’ll need to know the differences between the three ROS levels to determining the proper level of history and therefore, E/M code level:
A problem-pertinent ROS occurs when the urologist reviews a single system during the encounter, presumably the system directly related to the problem identified in the patient’s history of present illness (HPI). For a urology practice, “pertinent” refers to the genitourinary system, says Becky Boone, CPC, CUC, certified reimbursement assistant for the University of Missouri Department of Surgery in Columbia, which means the urologist reviews at least one item within the GU system.
A problem-pertinent ROS supports a level two new patient E/M service (99202) or a level three established patient E/M service (99213).
When the physician conducts an extended ROS, he should review a “limited”...
600 coders, physicians, and office managers gathered in Orlando, Fla. for one and a half jam-packed days of education, networking, and shopping at the December 2011 Coding Update and Reimbursement Conference. Coders’ biggest struggle was absorbing all the information – and not overdoing the holiday buying. Experts offered the inside scoop on medical coding changes for 2011 and beyond. Here are my top picks:
This...
If you’ve been writing off tobacco cessation counseling as non-payable, it’s time to change your tune.
The change: In the past, you could collect for tobacco cessation counseling for a patient with a tobacco-related disease or with signs or symptoms of one. But on Aug. 25, CMS announced that “under new coverage, any smoker covered by Medicare will be able to receive tobacco cessation counseling from a qualified physician or other Medicare recognized practitioner who can work with them to help them stop using tobacco.”
“For too long, many tobacco users with Medicare coverage were denied access to evidencebased tobacco cessation counseling,” said Kathleen Sebelius, HHS secretary, in an Aug. 25 statement. “Most Medicare beneficiaries want to quit their tobacco use. Now, older adults and other Medicare beneficiaries can get the help they need to successfully overcome tobacco dependence.”
Count Attempts and Minutes
The new tobacco cessation counseling coverage expansion will apply to services under Medicare Part B and Part A. That means your physicians and coders should know how to correctly document and report the sessions.
“Medicare allows billing for two counseling attempts in a year, but each attempt can occur over multiple sessions, with four sessions per attempt,” explains Jennifer Swindle, CPC, CPC-E/M, CPC-FP, RHIT, CCP-P, director of coding and compliance for PivotHealth LLC in Brentwood, Tenn.
According to section 12 of chapter 32 of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, “Claims for smoking and tobacco use cessation counseling services shall be submitted with an appropriate diagnosis code. Diagnosis codes should reflect: the condition the patient has that is adversely affected by tobacco use or the condition the patient is being treated for with a therapeutic agent whose metabolism or dosing is affected by tobacco use.”
Swindle says 305.1 (Tobacco use disorder) is one diagnosis supporting...
Medicare still won’t reimburse audiologist-billed Epley. After two years of battles with CMS over canalith repositioning procedure (CRP) coding, physicians will finally get paid for these specific codes. CPT® 2009 excited ENT coders with new CPT cod...
You’ll soon capture counseling per disease.
For combination vaccines that may involve counseling on as many as five different diseases, getting paid as though you counseled on one never seemed fair, but CPT 2011 lets you capture that extra counseling work.
Although multiple component vaccines require counseling on each disease, physicians have only been able to capture counseling for vaccine administration once per administration. CPT 2011 solves the problem with new immunization administration with counseling codes that you’ll code per vaccine component.
CPT 2011 deletes 90465-90468 (Immunization administration younger than 8 years of age … when the physician counsels the patient/family … per day). Codes 90471-90474 (Immunization administration …) remain.
Use 90460 as Vaccine Administration With Counseling Base Code
No more looking at administration route when choosing which immunization administration with counseling code. For vaccine administration, you’ll assign one code for each vaccine’s initial component:
Definition: A component refers to the antigen in a vaccine that prevents disease caused by one organism.
CPT streamlines your coding of the vaccine counseling codes by giving you one universal base code. The code includes “any route of administration.” You no longer have to choose a different code based on whether the code is intramuscular/subcutaneous or oral/intranasal.
Step 2: Report Second Vaccine Component With +90461
Coders can breathe a sigh of relief as the complexities over deciding which 90465-90468 code to use as the base code will soon end. CPT 2011 gives you only one vaccine administration with counseling base code (90460). For each additional vaccine component, you report the same add on code:
...
Pediatric and family practice coders are all too familiar with ADD-like complaints minus a definitive diagnosis. ICD-9 2011 holds the key to alternative options until further testing is complete. ICD-9 2011 adds the 799.5x family to the “Ill Defined ...
With multiple ways to denervate the sensory nerve/nerve branches, pain management coders may argue about which 64xxx code is right. You’ve got to dig into the chart note to identify the method used. See if you’re up to the challenge with this Supercoder Forum Insight.
Question: A provider is doing RFA’s of the left L4, L5, S1, S2, S3 and SA. He is billing 64622 x 1 and 64623 x 4. The other pain provider states this is incorrect and that he should be billing 64640 for S1, S2, S3 and SA. Which coding is correct?
Answer: This is a complex coding issue because there are several different methods to denervate the sensory nerve/nerve branches that provide innervations from the SI joint. Because of this, the coding will depend somewhat on the method used.
However, I can say that reporting 64622 and 64623 x 4 is incorrect. The “paravertebral facet joint nerves” that provide innervations to the facet joints in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions are the medial branches off the dorsal ramus. In the sacrum, there are indeed medial branches, but – as their name indicates – the path for these nerve branches is to the midline to provide innervations to the multifidus muscles and not laterally to the SI joint. So, following the published CPT Instructions for Use of the CPT Codebook – “Do not select a CPT code that merely approximates the service provided”, even though they are similar, procedures performed on the lateral branches of the sacral nerves should not be reported as paravertebral facet joint nerve procedures (i.e., paravertebral facet joint injections or destructions).
A few of the more common techniques are:
...
Plus: CMS has proposed freezing the ICD-9 codeset after next year.
If you were hoping that the Oct. 1, 2013 ICD-10 implementation date wasn’t set in stone, you are out of luck. That’s the word from CMS during a June 15 CMS Open Door Forum entitled “ICD-10 Implementation in a 5010 Environment.”
“There will be no delays on this implementation period, and no grace period,” said Pat Brooks, RHIA, with CMS’s Hospital and Ambulatory Policy Group, during the call. “A number of you have contacted us about rumors you’ve heard about postponement of that date or changes to that date, but I can assure you that that is a firm implementation date,” she stressed.
Brooks indicated that the rumor about a potential delay in the implementation date continues to persist throughout the physician community, and recommended that practice managers alert their physicians to the fact that that the rumor is untrue.
The Oct. 1, 2013 date will be in effect for both inpatient and outpatient services. Keep in mind that the ICD-10 implementation will have no impact on CPT and HCPCS coding, Brooks said. You will still continue to bill your CPT and HCPCS procedure codes as before.
You’ll Find Nearly 55,000 Additional Codes
Currently, CMS publishes about 14,000 ICD-9 codes, but there are over 69,000 ICD-10 codes. The additional codes will allow you to provide greater detail in describing diagnoses and procedures, Brooks said.
If you’re wondering which specific codes ICD-10 includes for your specialty, you can check out the entire 2010 ICD-10 codeset, which CMS has posted on its Web site. “Later this year, we’ll be posting the 2011 update,” Brooks said during the call.
@ For more details on CMS’ upcoming plans, subscribe to Part B Insider (Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC).
Sign...
If the doctor does not circle a diagnosis, it may be up to you to find one.
Don’t let an incomplete superbill damage your chances of submitting an accurate claim. If the doctor in your office fails to indicate the ICD-9 code for the condition that he treated, you should read through his documentation to find which diagnoses you should report.
Open the Notes When You Have to — and Even When You Don’t
Suppose your physician hands you a superbill with the procedures circled and the diagnosis left blank.
You could ask the physician which diagnosis to report, or you could examine the documentation yourself. If your office has a policy that includes “coding by abstraction” by certified/qualified coders, then submitting charges based on what is supported (documented) in the note is appropriate, says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CPCH,CPC-P, CENTC, CHCC, with CRN Healthcare Solutions in Tinton Falls, N.J. The physician should be signing off on these charges as part of your internal policy.
Some practices choose to review the documentation and compare it against any diagnoses recorded on the superbill, even when they aren’t required to. This ensures that the documentation matches the code selection every time.
When in Doubt, Confirm With the Physician
If you are new at coding diagnoses from the physician’s notes, you should doublecheck your code selections with the practitioners before submitting your claims.
“Until a coder feels comfortable with the ICD-9 books and the codes used more often in their office, it’s a good idea to run the choices by a clinician,” says Suzan Berman, CPC, CEMC, CEDC, senior manager of coding and compliance with the Physician Services Division of UPMC in Pittsburgh. “You never want to give a patient a disease or symptom they don’t have ” or one more...
The reason your patient is visiting is key. Question: We have a patient who came in for a routine eye exam, but reported retinal damage from a BB-gun incident six years ago. What would be the best way to code this? This is a new patient, and I do not h...
From head to toe, the new diagnosis codes hold something for everyone.
Whether your patients present with cardiologic, orthopedic, or gynecologic complaints, the next round of ICD-9 codes could hold important changes for you. Here’s the rundown on the new codes most relevant to radiologists — including a new option for retained magnetic metal fragments.
Remember: ICD-9 2011 will go into effect Oct. 1, 2010. The official version will be released in the fall, so the codes below are not yet final.
1. Look Forward to More Specific Ectasia Codes
The proposed changes to ICD-9 2011 add four codes specific to aortic ectasia. These codes are among the most significant changes for radiology coders because you may see that term in your radiologist’s findings, says Helen L. Avery, CPC, CHC, CPC-I, manager of revenue cycle services for Los Angeles-based Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting Inc. “Ectasia” means dilation or enlargement, and aortic ectasia typically refers to enlargement that is milder than an aneurysm. But ICD-9 2010 does not distinguish ectasia from aneurysm, indexing aortic ectasia to 441.9 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site without mention of rupture) and 441.5 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site, ruptured).
The proposed 2011 codes are specific to aortic ectasia and differ based on anatomic site:
2. Watch for ‘Claudication’ in Stenosis Report
Another one of the important changes is the proposed addition of 724.03 (Spinal stenosis, lumbar region, with neurogenic claudication), says Avery. The code refers to lumbar spinal stenosis, which is a narrowing of the spinal canal, according to the Sept. 16-17, 2009, ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting proposal (available here). Neurogenic claudication “is a commonly used term for a...
These edits took effect April 1, so start observing them yesterday.
The latest version of the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) has an edit that family practice coders should note – especially if the practice treats newborn patients.
Get to know the new CCI 16.1 edit and get ready to observe it with this expert breakdown. Check Column 1 on These Hospital E/Ms According to CCI 16.1, these codes are in column 1 of the mutually exclusive edits:
Column 2 of these edits includes these codes:
Translation: An FP may not report both normal newborn care and subsequent hospital care for a newborn on the same date of service. If the FP performs normal newborn services (99460-99462) on the same date that the newborn later becomes ill and receives subsequent hospital care (99231-99233), you should only report a code from the 99231-99233 code set, explains Kent Moore, manager of health care financing and delivery systems for the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) in Leawood, Kan.
The...
Tip: This encounter involves topical applications and patient care instruction in addition to removing devitalized tissue.
Question: When the surgeon performs a wound VAC or cleans a wound by scraping with a sharp curette (not excising tissue), is it appropriate to use a debridement code or should we report an active wound care management code from the range 97597-97606?
Ohio Subscriber
Answer: Physicians typically use the debridement codes (11000-11001, Debridement of extensive eczematous or infected skin; … or 11004-11005, Debridement of skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle and fascia for necrotizing soft tissue infection; …) for debridement by any method.
Without...