Coder's Cranium

Billing How-To: Should A Provider Change Tax IDs?

Despite disadvantages, a new tax ID is a must when physicians leave your group.

Question: One of our optometrists wants to stop billing under the group’s tax ID and start billing under his own tax ID. I’m concerned that doing so will confuse the insurance companies and slow down his income, even though he has personally called some to notify them of the change and the effective date. Some payers are now asking for new W9 forms. Is there an easy way to do it?

Answer: Your optometrist can change his tax ID at any time, but you must submit a new W9 to your payers, in addition to a letter explaining that he will no longer be practicing under the group’s tax ID.

Downside: Yes, the optometrist’s income will be slowed. You also run the risk that the payer’s enrollment department does not handle the paperwork properly. Other billers have reported instances of the income being paid to the old tax ID or not being paid at all. Claims can also be lost even though the correct paperwork has been submitted multiple times.

If your optometrist is currently part of a group, and he is leaving the group, he needs his own tax ID. Many legal issues will arise from this. For example, if he is staying in the same office suite, he will have to pay market rent for the offices and staff that he is using. When patients move between the old practice and his new practice, questions will arise about which patients are considered new and which are considered established patients.

Much of this will have to be determined by the legal structure that is set up as he leaves the group. This can be a much more complex change than it appears on the...

Comments Off on Billing How-To: Should A Provider Change Tax IDs?
June 16, 2010
Provider News

Diagnosis Coding: Here’s How To Decode Your Physician’s Notes

If the doctor does not circle a diagnosis, it may be up to you to find one.

Don’t let an incomplete superbill damage your chances of submitting an accurate claim. If the doctor in your office fails to indicate the ICD-9 code for the condition that he treated, you should read through his documentation to find which diagnoses you should report.

Open the Notes When You Have to — and Even When You Don’t

Suppose your physician hands you a superbill with the procedures circled and the diagnosis left blank.

You could ask the physician which diagnosis to report, or you could examine the documentation yourself. If your office has a policy that includes “coding by abstraction” by certified/qualified coders, then submitting charges based on what is supported (documented) in the note is appropriate, says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CPCH,CPC-P, CENTC, CHCC, with CRN Healthcare Solutions in Tinton Falls, N.J. The physician should be signing off on these charges as part of your internal policy.

Some practices choose to review the documentation and compare it against any diagnoses recorded on the superbill, even when they aren’t required to. This ensures that the documentation matches the code selection every time.

When in Doubt, Confirm With the Physician

If you are new at coding diagnoses from the physician’s notes, you should doublecheck your code selections with the practitioners before submitting your claims.

“Until a coder feels comfortable with the ICD-9 books and the codes used more often in their office, it’s a good idea to run the choices by a clinician,” says Suzan Berman, CPC, CEMC, CEDC, senior manager of coding and compliance with the Physician Services Division of UPMC in Pittsburgh. “You never want to give a patient a disease or symptom they don’t have  ” or one more...

Comments Off on Diagnosis Coding: Here’s How To Decode Your Physician’s Notes
June 16, 2010
Provider News

Emergency Coders: Check for Critical Care & You Could Gain $50

If patient’s critical care and visit satisfies time regs, 99291 is the better bet.

When scouring the notes for evidence of an emergency department caveat scenario, coders can easily forget to ask themselves one simple question: Can I report a critical care code for this scenario?

The answer’s yes more often than you might think, says Caral Edelberg, CPC, CPMA, CCS-P, CHC, president of Edelberg Compliance Associates in Baton Rouge, La.

“Many patients who qualify for the caveat may also be candidates for critical care. If the condition is severe enough that the patient’s ability to provide this information is impaired, then the condition may be critical,” she explains.

Critical Care Omits Specific History Component

Considering critical care and the caveat simultaneously can make your head spin, as the ED caveat does not even apply to 99291 (Critical care, evaluation and management of the critical ill or critically injured patient; first 30-74 minutes) or +99292 (… each additional 30 minutes [List separately in addition to code for primary service]).

Why? “There are not the same bullet-counting requirements for documentation of history, physical examination, or MDM [medical decision making] for critical care,” explains Edelberg. The descriptors for critical care concern only E/M of the critically ill or injured patient.

So when your physician invokes the emergency department caveat for a patient, check to see if the patient was critically ill or injured; if she was, and the physician documents at least 30 minutes of critical care, consider 99291.

Payout: The only level of service you can invoke the emergency department caveat on is 99285 (Emergency department visit for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires these 3 key components within the constraints imposed by the urgency of the patient’s clinical condition and/or mental status: a comprehensive history; a...

Comments Off on Emergency Coders: Check for Critical Care & You Could Gain $50
June 13, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

Wound Coding: 3 Tips Help You Recover Your Full Debridement Pay

Maximize 11040-11044 pay with modifier 51.

In most cases, your practice won’t report debridement separate from wound repair codes. But when exceptions arise, follow these three tips to choose the appropriate wound repair code.

If you’re considering reporting debridement separate from a wound closure, make sure your physician’s notes clearly document that the wound was contaminated and required saline or other substances or instrumentation to cleanse and debride the wound.

Don’t miss: If you report a debridement code with your wound closure codes, append modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) to the debridement code. This informs the payer that you recognize that debridement is generally bundled into wound repair, but that clinical circumstances required the physician to perform debridement as a separate service.

1. Look for Wound Repair With the Debridement

CPT specifies that you may also report debridement codes independently of repair codes when the physician removes large amounts of devitalized or contaminated tissue or when the physician performs debridement without immediate primary repair of a wound, notes Pamela Biffle, CPC, CPC-I, CCS-P, CHCC, CHCO, owner of PB Healthcare Consulting and Education Inc. in Watauga, Texas.

The physician may clean debris from the wound without repairing the wound because it was either not deep enough to require repair or the physician delayed the repair due to an extenuating circumstance.

In the case in which the dermatologist excises a lesion, debridement is included in the procedure. However, when the dermatologist only performs debridement or performs the debridement in addition to the wound repair, such as the case when a wound is excessively dirty or contaminated with debris, you would also code the debridement code with the wound repair/excision code, appending modifier 51 (Multiple procedures) for the multiple procedure.

Example: A patient returns to the dermatologist several days after a chemical...

Comments Off on Wound Coding: 3 Tips Help You Recover Your Full Debridement Pay
June 13, 2010
Coding Challenge

Ophthalmology Coders: Does Old BB-Gun Injury Have Bearing on Coding?

The reason your patient is visiting is key. Question: We have a patient who came in for a routine eye exam, but reported retinal damage from a BB-gun incident six years ago. What would be the best way to code this? This is a new patient, and I do not h...

Comments Off on Ophthalmology Coders: Does Old BB-Gun Injury Have Bearing on Coding?
June 13, 2010
Provider News

Radiology Coding: Watch for 4 Key ICD-9 Additions

From head to toe, the new diagnosis codes hold something for everyone.

Whether your patients present with cardiologic, orthopedic, or gynecologic complaints, the next round of ICD-9 codes could hold important changes for you. Here’s the rundown on the new codes most relevant to radiologists — including a new option for retained magnetic metal fragments.

Remember: ICD-9 2011 will go into effect Oct. 1, 2010. The official version will be released in the fall, so the codes below are not yet final.

1. Look Forward to More Specific Ectasia Codes

The proposed changes to ICD-9 2011 add four codes specific to aortic ectasia. These codes are among the most significant changes for radiology coders because you may see that term in your radiologist’s findings, says Helen L. Avery, CPC, CHC, CPC-I, manager of revenue cycle services for Los Angeles-based Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting Inc. “Ectasia” means dilation or enlargement, and aortic ectasia typically refers to enlargement that is milder than an aneurysm. But ICD-9 2010 does not distinguish ectasia from aneurysm, indexing aortic ectasia to 441.9 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site without mention of rupture) and 441.5 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site, ruptured).

The proposed 2011 codes are specific to aortic ectasia and differ based on anatomic site:

  • 447.70 — Aortic ectasia, unspecified site
  • 447.71 — Thoracic aortic ectasia
  • 447.72 — Abdominal aortic ectasia
  • 447.73 — Thoracoabdominal aortic ectasia.

2. Watch for ‘Claudication’ in Stenosis Report

Another one of the important changes is the proposed addition of 724.03 (Spinal stenosis, lumbar region, with neurogenic claudication), says Avery. The code refers to lumbar spinal stenosis, which is a narrowing of the spinal canal, according to the Sept. 16-17, 2009, ICD-9-CM Coordination and Maintenance Committee meeting proposal (available here). Neurogenic claudication “is a commonly used term for a...

Comments Off on Radiology Coding: Watch for 4 Key ICD-9 Additions
June 10, 2010
Medicare / Toolkit

Chiropractic Coding: Avoid This Common Documentation Mistake

Treatment plans are a must, experts say.

You’ve treated your chiropractic patient, you’ve selected the correct codes, and you’ve submitted your claim. All set, right? Not quite. Check out this common mistake that chiropractors make.

“Many chiropractors do not create written chiropractic treatment plans for every new patient,” says Marty Kotlar, DC, CHCC, CBCS, president of Target Coding, a chiropractic coding and billing consulting firm. Use this checklist to ensure you send Medicare the information CMS most wants to see included “with every new patient plan of care,” Kotlar says:

__ The history
__ Present illness
__ Family history
__ The past health history
__ The physical examination
__ The diagnosis
__ The plan — This should include:

  • Therapeutic modalities to effect cure or relief (patient education and exercise training)
  • The level of care that is recommended (the duration and frequency of visits)
  • Specific goals that are to be achieved with treatment
  • The objective measures that will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment
  • Date of initial treatment.

__ Signature/initials to authenticate the records.

@ Part B Insider (Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC).

Sign up for the upcoming live audio conference, Risk Management Strategies for Healthcare Providers, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Chiropractic Coding: Avoid This Common Documentation Mistake
June 8, 2010
Coding Challenge / pathology

Medical Coders: Focus on Fibroid Diagnosis

Find out why you should code the pathology exam of uterus with leiomyomas as 88307.

Question: When our pathologist diagnoses uterine fibroid tumors, what ICD-9 code should we use?

Pennsylvania Subscriber

Answer: You should choose the diagnosis based on the fibroid’s location:

  • Submucous fibroids (218.0, Submucous leiomyoma of uterus) grow from the uterine wall toward the uterine cavity. They are also called intracavitary fibroids.
  • Intramural fibroids (218.1, Intramural leiomyoma of uterus) grow within the uterine wall (myometrium). They are also called interstitial fibroids.
  • Subserous fibroids (218.2, Subserous leiomyoma of uterus) grow outward from the uterine wall toward the abdominal cavity. They are also called subperitoneal fibroids.
  • If the physician does not specify the uterine fibroid’s location, assign 218.9 (Leiomyoma of uterus, unspecified) as the diagnosis.

CPT alert: You should code the pathology exam of uterus with leiomyomas as 88307 (Level V — Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, uterus, with or without tubes and ovaries, other than neoplastic/prolapse).

Although ICD9 classifies leiomyoma as a benign neoplasm, a coding convention supported by the American Medical Association and the College of American Pathologists dictates that you code this condition as 88307, not 88309 (Level VI — Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, uterus, with or without tubes and ovaries, neoplastic).

For myomectomy specimens — fibroid tumors that the surgeon removes while leaving the uterus intact — bill the pathology exam as 88305 (Level IV — Surgical pathology, gross and microscopic examination, leiomyoma[s], uterine myomectomy — without uterus).

@ Pathology/Lab Coding Alert. Editor: Ellen Garver, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live audio conference, Optimize Your Fibroid Coding and Billing: The Bottom-Line Basics for the Best Reimbursement, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Medical Coders: Focus on Fibroid Diagnosis
May 27, 2010
Cardiology / CMS / MAC / Provider News

MACs Differ on Response to CMS’s Cardiology Payment Adjustments

Don’t look for a raise just yet, in most cases.

CMS may talk, but MACs don’t always listen — at least not quickly.

As we told you in last week’s Insider, CMS recently corrected several “technical errors” published in the 2010 Fee Schedule, and thanks to these corrections, Medicare will increase payment for several cardiology-related testing codes, including codes 75571-75574 (Heart CT) and 78451-78454 (Heart muscle SPECT imaging).

Although many practices are eager to see the payment boosts in their next Medicare payments, that may be an overly ambitious goal at this point.

“I inquired with a few MAC carriers such as Trailblazer, Noridian, and Palmetto, and was told different things by different Medicare payers,” says Terry Fletcher, BS, CPC, CCS-P, CCS, CMSCS, CCC, CEMS, CMS, CEO of Terry Fletcher Consulting Inc.

“One did not even know there was a change,” she says. “Next, Noridian said that they will be making the adjustments when they get the directive from CMS. And Palmetto said they would need the provider to contact them and then batch retroactive to January the myocardial perfusion imaging claims and send a letter to request the increase,” she says.

Bottom line: Until CMS provides a clear answer to the MACs regarding when they must implement the changes, you may not see your pay increases, but keep an eye on your carrier’s Web site for information on when it intends to reprocess claims using the new rates.

@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, You Can Use the Appeals Process Like a Pro, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on MACs Differ on Response to CMS’s Cardiology Payment Adjustments
May 27, 2010
Audit / CMS / Oig / RAC / Toolkit

Recovery Audit Contractors: Know These RAC Fast Facts

RACs are just another tool in the government’s arsenal to collect improper payments.

You’ve got so many compliance acronyms flying at you every day that you may not be able to differentiate your RAC from the OIG. Know these quick facts about RACs to stay better informed.

  • Recovery audit contractors (RACs) detect and correct past improper payments so CMS and the MACs can prevent such problems in the future
  • RACs are hired as contractors by the government, and they can can collect “contingency fees,” which means that they get a percentage of the amount that they recover from providers who were paid inappropriately The maximum RAC lookback period is three years, and they cannot review claims paid prior to Oct. 1, 2007
  • Between 2005 and 2008, RACs involved in the original demonstration project recovered over $1.03 billion in Medicare improper payments, but referred only two cases of potential fraud to CMS, according to a February OIG report on the topic, which noted that “because RACs do not receive their contingency fees for cases they refer that are determined to be fraud, there may be a disincentive for RACs to refer potential cases of fraud.”
  • Unlike RACs, the OIG is a government entity. Although the OIG also performs reviews and audits and seeks improper payments, the OIG does not collect contingency fees.

For more on the RAC program, visit www.cms.gov/rac.

@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, You Can Use the Appeals Process Like a Pro, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Recovery Audit Contractors: Know These RAC Fast Facts
May 24, 2010
Medicare / Oig / Provider News

Cost of Freezing Conversion Factor is Over $6 Billion — Just for 2010

Plus: The OIG recovered over $1.5 billion in fiscal year 2009, and is on the lookout to collect more.

With less than two weeks to go before Medicare payments once again threaten to decrease by 21 percent, a new report sheds light on the financial outcome of Congressional actions.

Although the 2010 Physician Fee Schedule originally included a conversion factor that would have been 21 percent lower than the 2009 level, practices haven’t felt that cut yet this year,because legislators have voted several times to freeze payments, which now use the conversion factor of $36.0791. That freeze will expire on May 31, after which your Medicare payments will drop considerably unless Congress steps in once more.

However, one government entity’s calculations show that the freeze is costly. According to a May 7 Congressional Budget Office report, freezing payments at the current levels for the rest of 2010 would cost the government… … $6.5 billion. The AMA has turned up the heat on Congress to replace the current payment method, releasing a print ad aimed at Congress to demonstrate that “more delays of permanent reform now increase the cost for taxpayers,” and that the association “calls on Congress to fix the flawed Medicare physician payment formula now.”

Congress has not yet introduced a bill to extend the payment freeze past May 31. Keep an eye on the Insider for more information as this story develops.

To read the Congressional Budget Office’s calculation sheet,visit www.cbo.gov/budget/factsheets/2010b/SGR-menu.pdf.

@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming on-demand Webinar, 5 Steps to Optimize Your Office’s Coding & Billing Practices, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Cost of Freezing Conversion Factor is Over $6 Billion — Just for 2010
May 24, 2010
Coding Challenge / modifier 26

Hip Injection With Fluoro — Is Coding Both Allowed?

You have two options depending on how the physician performed the procedure.

Question: Our orthopedist administered a hip injection under fluoroscopy. Can I report both codes?

Wyoming Subscriber

Answer: You can code both the injection and fluoroscopy, but the correct choices depend on how your physician completed the procedure.

Option 1: If your orthopedist injected radiopaque dye and performed the arthrography concurrently, code the procedure with 27093 (Injection procedure for hip arthrography; without anesthesia).

Option 2: If he completed the guidance and injection as separate procedures, submit 20610 (Arthrocentesis, aspiration, and/or injection; major joint or bursa [e.g., shoulder, hip, knee joint, subacromial bursa]) for the injection. Include 77002 (Fluoroscopic guidance for needle placement [e.g., biopsy, aspiration, injection, localization device]) for the fluoroscopic guidance.

Remember to append modifier 26 (Professional component) to 77002 because your physician performed the service but doesn’t own the fluoroscopy equipment.

SI change: If the physician injects the sacroiliac joint instead of the hip joint, choose either 20610 (Arthrocentesis, aspiration, and/or injection; major joint or bursa [e.g., shoulder, hip, knee joint, subacromial bursa]) or 27096 (Injection procedure for sacroiliac joint, arthrography and/or anesthetic/steroid).

@ Orthopedic Coding Alert. Editor: Leigh DeLozier, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live audio conference, Coding Tips for Hip Procedures, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Hip Injection With Fluoro — Is Coding Both Allowed?
May 20, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

Ace CPT and ICD-9 Coding for Intra-Arterial Cases

Whether liver neoplasm is primary or secondary will change your coding.

Good news: You can apply many of the same rules you already know for intravenous chemotherapy coding to intra-arterial coding, too. So take your chemo coding expertise to the next level by adding intra-arterial skills to your arsenal.

Start here: For intra-arterial (IA) chemotherapy, you should choose from the following codes, says Gwen Davis, CPC, associate with Washington-based Derry, Nolan, and Associates.

  • 96420 — Chemotherapy administration, intra-arterial; push technique
  • 96422 — … infusion technique, up to 1 hour
  • +96423 — … infusion technique, each additional hour, (List separately

...

Comments Off on Ace CPT and ICD-9 Coding for Intra-Arterial Cases
May 20, 2010
Coding Challenge

Medical Coders: Don’t Let Shorthand Block You From Correct Code

If you have a question, be sure to ask your physician.

Question: A patient reports to the ER at 8 a.m. on a Sunday morning. He reports a horrible toothache that started on Friday; he says he planned to “tough it out” over the weekend and see his dentist Monday, but the pain was too severe; he reports 10 on a 10-point pain scale. The ER physician performs an “inf. Aveo block,” according to the notes. What condition do the notes reflect, and how should I code this scenario?

Massachusetts Subscriber

Answer: You should double-check with the physician before filing...

Comments Off on Medical Coders: Don’t Let Shorthand Block You From Correct Code
May 18, 2010
Coder's Cranium / ICD-9

Avoid CVA Diagnosis Coding Pitfalls with 438.13, 438.14

You’ll turn to a V code when your neurologist reports ‘no effects,’ however.

When your neurologist sees a patient who had a stroke, either recently or in the distant past, he may record a number of different conditions — which makes your job more difficult. If you remember a few guidelines, you’ll select the proper ICD-9 codes for every cerebrovascular accident (CVA) case your neurologist treats.

Get Specific With 2 CVA Diagnosis Codes

When your neurologist sees a patient who has had a stroke, or CVA, he may document multiple deficiencies, both new and lingering. When the patient presents with...

Comments Off on Avoid CVA Diagnosis Coding Pitfalls with 438.13, 438.14
May 16, 2010