General / Provider News

HPI Know-How Helps You Catch Level 4 and 5 E/M Opportunities

 

Beware of CPT® and Medicare differences when counting HPI elements.

Not accurately accounting for the history of presentillness (HPI) documented by your oncologist could result in missing appropriate opportunities to report level 4 or 5 E/M visits. Ensure you’re not missing higher paying possibilities by reviewing this guide to capturing HPI elements.

Brush Up on What Qualifies as an HPI Element

HPI is one of the three parts comprising an outpatient E/M history. It describes the patient’s present illness or problem, from the first sign/symptom to the current status, and typically drives a provider’s decisions about the physical examination and treatment. “The information gathered during the physical exam (PE) portion of a patient’s evaluation often only shows a very limited picture of the patient’s problem. However, speaking with a patient and gathering the history of the patient’s problem” can help fill out the picture, explains Amanda S. Stoltman, CCS-P, compliance coder at Urology Associates in Muncie, Ind.

 Start counting:

HPI also will often determine the level of service you’ll report. You’ll count the HPI elements to help you determine which level of service you can report. There are seven or eight HPI elements, depending on which source you are following. For Medicare, the eight elements are as follows: 

  • Location
  • Quality
  • Severity
  • Duration
  • Timing
  • Context
  • Modifying factors
  • Associated signs and symptoms.

Medicare includes the above list in both the 1995 and 1997 E/M Documentation Guidelines, available at www.cms.gov/MLNEdWebGuide/25_EMDOC.asp.

In contrast: CPT® lists only seven HPI elements in the E/M Services Guidelines, with duration not making the list. Therefore, for Medicare and payers following its guidelines, you should consider duration and timing separately. With payers that follow AMA rules, however, be aware that they don’t consider duration and timing to be two separate elements. Rumor has it...

Comments Off on HPI Know-How Helps You Catch Level 4 and 5 E/M Opportunities
June 22, 2011
Coder's Cranium / General / Hot Coding Topics

10120 or Beyond: Site, Depth, Complexity Drive Códe Choice

Follow 3 pointers to snag maximum pay.

From just under the skin to deep within the bowels, your general surgeon might perform a foreign body removal (FBR) that calls on a wide range of coding know-how. Zero in on the right codè every time by implementing these four principles:

1. Use 10120-10121 for Any Site Under Skin

If your surgeon makes an opening to remove any foreign body, such as a glass shard or a metal filing, but doesn’t indicate an anatomic site or depth in the op report, you’ll probably choose 10120 (Incision and removal of foreign body, subcutaneous tissues; simple). You can’t choose a more specific codè if the surgical report doesn’t provide any more documentation.

Caveat: Because the codè requires incision, look for a sharp object when considering 10120. If the documentation doesn’t include this detail, use an E/M service codè (such as 99201-99215, Office or Other Outpatient Services) instead of the skin FBR codè.

Look for complications: If the surgeon uses the term “simple” in the op note or fails to note any extenuating circumstances, you’re good to go with 10120. But the surgeon might perform a complicated FBR, meaning that the foreign body was harder than usual to remove. In these situations, the note should indicate, for example, extended exploration around the wound site, presence of a complicating infection, or sometimes the need to use visualization and localization techniques, such as x-ray. In those cases, you should choose 10121 (… complicated) for a subcutaneous FBR with no mention of anatomic site.

2. Search Musculoskeletal Codè for Specific Site

CPT® contains higher-paying FBR codè s than 10120-10121, but the surgeon needs to document the following two details before you can use the codès:

Location: You’ll find myriad FBR codès scattered throughout CPT®’s “Musculoskeletal System” section (20000-29999),...

Comments Off on 10120 or Beyond: Site, Depth, Complexity Drive Códe Choice
May 20, 2011
Coder's Cranium / General / Hot Coding Topics / Provider News

Overcome 3 Myths and Claim Reimbursement Opportunities using Modifier 22

Don’t fall for these common body habitus, time, and fee traps.

If you overuse Modifièr 22 (Increased procedural services), you may face increased scrutiny from your payers or even the Office of Inspector General (OIG). But if you avoid the modifièr entirely, you’re likely missing out on reimbursement your cardiologist deserves.

How it works: When a procedure requires significant additional time or effort that falls outside the normal effort of services described by a particular CPT® codè — and no other CPT® codè better describes the work involved in the procedure — you should look to modifièr 22. Modifièr 22 represents those extenuating circumstances that do not merit the use of an additional or alternative CPT® codè but do land outside the norm and may support added reimbursement for a given procedure.  Take a look at these three myths — and the realities — to ensure you don’t fall victim to these modifièr 22 trouble spots.

Myth 1: Morbid Obesity Means Automatic 22

Sometimes, an interventional cardiologist may need to spend more time than usual positioning a morbidly obese patient for a procedure and accèssing the vessels involved in that procedure. In that case, it may be appropriate to append modifièr 22 to the relevant surgical codè. However, it’s not appropriate to assume that just because the patient is morbidly obese you can always append modifièr 22.  “Modifièr 22 is about extra procedural work and, although morbid obesity might lead to extra work, it is not enough in itself,” says Marcella Bucknam, CPC, CCS-P, CPC-H, CCS, CPC-P, COBGC, CCC, Manager of Compliance education for the University of Washington Physiciáns Compliance Program in Seattle.

“Unless time is significant or the intensity of the procedure is increased due to the obesity, then modifièr 22 should not be appended,” warns Maggie Mac, CPC,...

Comments Off on Overcome 3 Myths and Claim Reimbursement Opportunities using Modifier 22
May 20, 2011
Cardiology / CCI / Hot Coding Topics / Provider News

CCI Edit: 93454-93461 Note These Column Changes For Correct Cardiology Coding

Correct Coding Initiative version 17.1 brings 11,831 new edit pairs, effective April 1 for physicians. That’s the word from a March 17 announcement by Frank Cohen, principal and senior analyst for the Frank Cohen Group. Here’s a look at the major pointers you need to keep in mind to comply with the new cardiology-related edits, including cardiac catheterization, radiological supervision and interpretation, cardiac rehabilitation, and more.

1. Prevent Denials by Remembering 93454-93461 Are Diagnostic

New edits will prevent you from reporting heart catheter/angiography codes 93454- 93461 (column 2) with the following cardiovascular therapeutic services and procedures (column 1):

  • 92975 — Thrombolysis coronary; by intracoronary infusion, including selective coronary angiography
  • 92980 — Transcatheter placement of an intracoronary stent(s), percutaneous, with or without other therapeutic intervention, any method; single vessel
  • 92982 — Percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty; single vessel
  • 92995 — Percutaneous transluminal coronary atherectomy, by mechanical or other method, with or without balloon angioplasty; single vessel.

The 929xx codes in column 1 describe coronary therapies. The 934xx codes in column 2 are diagnostic procedures. You should never use the 934xx diagnostic codes in column 2 to report catheter placement and coronary angiography performed as an integral part of the therapeutic column 1 services.

Opportunity: The edits have a modifier indicator of 1, so you may override them with an appropriate modifier when the procedures are distinct. If you report both codes in the edit pair and don’t append a modifier to the column 2 code, Medicare (and payers applying Medicare rules) will reimburse you for only the column 1 code.

The AMA, via CPT Assistant (April 2005), indicates that you may report a true diagnostic catheterization in addition to the therapeutic procedures described by 92980 and 92982: “These two distinct procedures (diagnostic catheterization and therapeutic procedures), therefore, should...

Comments Off on CCI Edit: 93454-93461 Note These Column Changes For Correct Cardiology Coding
April 18, 2011
Hot Coding Topics

Choose The Most Appropriate Code with an Optometrist Expert Help

Even small ophthalmology practices are likely to have a Humphrey visual field analyzer, yet many ophthalmologists don’t know the secrets for securing adequate reimbursement for these services — and they even go so far as to put themselves at risk for costly audits due to lack of documentation.

CPT lists three different visual field examinations — and the higher the code, the higher the reimbursement.:

  • 92081 — Visual field examination, unilateral or bilateral, with interpretation and report; limited examination (e.g., tangent screen, Autoplot, arc perimeter or single stimulus level automated test, such as Octopus 3 or 7 equivalent)
  • 92082 — … intermediate examination (e.g., at least 2 isopters on Goldmann perimeter, or semiquantitative, automated suprathreshold screening program, Humphrey suprathreshold automatic diagnostic test, Octopus program 33)
  • 92083 — … extended examination (e.g., Goldmann visual fields with at least 3 isopters plotted and static determination within the central 30 degrees, or quantitative, automated threshold perimetry, Octopus program G-1, 32 or 42, Humphrey visual field analyzer full threshold programs 30-2, 24-2 or 30/60-2).

A common mistake ophthalmologists make is billing 92082 when they could legitimately bill 92083.

The key to choosing the correct VF code is in the code descriptors themselves. For example, if the ophthalmologist plots only two isopters on the Goldmann perimeter, CPT would call that “intermediate,” based on its description of 92082. If you plotted three isopters, however, that would be an “extended” examination that would qualify for 92083.

Rule of thumb: An intermediate test is one of the screening tests that you would use if you suspect neurological damage. But ophthalmologists use the threshold exam (92083) when they suspect something that causes a slow, progressive dimming of peripheral vision, like glaucoma. Glaucoma causes a loss of vision like a light bulb slowly becoming...

Comments Off on Choose The Most Appropriate Code with an Optometrist Expert Help
March 8, 2011
Hot Coding Topics

Emergency Reporting: Know When To Use +99140 With These Tips

Reporting any qualifying circumstances (QC) codes for anesthesia can be tricky, but knowing when to classify a situation as a true emergency can be a real challenge unless you’re well-versed in the emergency conditions guidelines. Check coding definitions and your provider’s documentation to know whether you can legitimately add two extra units for +99140 (Anesthesia complicated by emergency conditions [specify] [List separately in addition to code for primary anesthesia procedure]) to your claim.

CPT includes a note with +99140 stating that “an emergency is defined as existing when delay in treatment of the patient would lead to a significant increase in the threat to life or body parts.” Your key to knowing a case meets emergency conditions lies in your anesthesiologist’s notes.

“Quite a number of cases come in where the anesthesiologist marks ‘emergency’ but many times the ‘emergency’ isn’t all that clear,” says Leslie Johnson, CCS-P, CPC, director of coding and education for Medi-Corp., Inc., of New Jersey. Documentation supporting an emergency will depend on each case, so read the chart thoroughly when your provider indicates an emergency.

Solution: Talk with your anesthesia providers to clarify what constitutes an emergency and when you can include +99140. If there’s a real reason to report an emergency (such as a ruptured appendix, 540.0), your physician should clearly document the reason. Another diagnosis code to indicate a problem (such as unstable angina, 411.1) could help show the payer you’re reporting an unusual situation. The second diagnosis can also help in an appeal if a payer that ordinarily recognizes +99140 denies the claim.

“An OB patient who comes in for a cesarean section isn’t automatically an emergency,” explains Scott Groudine, M.D., professor of anesthesiology at Albany Medical Center in New York. “However, a diagnosis of fetal distress and prolapsed cord virtually always...

Comments Off on Emergency Reporting: Know When To Use +99140 With These Tips
March 8, 2011
Hot Coding Topics

Switch to 43327, 43328 for Esophagogastric Fundoplasty

Open or laparoscopic, through chest or abdominal wall, with or without hiatal hernia repair, with or without mesh … these are the various ways your surgeon might perform an esophagogastric fundoplasty. And these are the factors you’ll need to take into account when you try to pick the proper code(s) from among nine new choices in CPT 2011.

Let our experts show the way with four how-to tips for paraesophageal hiatalhernia repair and fundoplication coding for 2011.

Tip 1: Understand Pathophysiology

“When a patient is described as having a hiatal hernia, it usually means that part of the stomach has herniated through the opening in the diaphragm [esophageal hiatus] into the chest and is usually associated with esophageal reflux disease,” according to Gary W. Barone, MD, a physician and associate professor at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock.

The hernia repair typically involves the surgeon reducing the stomach back into the abdomen and suturing the enlarged diaphragmatic hiatus, explains M. Tray Dunaway, MD, FACS, CSP, a general surgeon and an educator with Healthcare Value Inc. in Camden, S.C.

During the fundoplication procedure, such as Nissen, the surgeon additionally wraps part of the fundus (top) of the stomach around the esophagus and sutured in place. This creates a “valve” that allows food to reach the stomach from the esophagus but prevents reflux back to the esophagus.

“I would say the Nissen fundoplication is the most common surgical procedure to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD),” Dunaway adds. Watch for gastroplasty: Sometimes the esophagus is shortened and the surgeon can’t reduce the hernia. “The surgeon might perform a gastroplasty, forming a tube of stomach to effectively elongate the distal esophagus,” Dunaway says. An example of such a procedure is a Collis gastroplasty.

Tip 2: Use 43332-43337 for Open...

Comments Off on Switch to 43327, 43328 for Esophagogastric Fundoplasty
February 22, 2011
Hot Coding Topics / Provider News

Watch Changes to EEG, Joint Injection Guidelines

You report several EEG codes such as 95812 (Electroencephalogram [EEG] extended monitoring; 41-60 minutes) and 95813 (… greater than 1 hour) based on the amount of recording time. But what constitutes recording time?

Jeffrey Cozzens, MD, professor and chair of the neurosurgery division of Southern Illinois University School of Medicine and a presenter at the AMA’s CPT and RBRVS 2011 Annual Symposium in Chicago, addressed the issue during his presentation about neurosurgery and neurology changes for 2011. Keep two things in mind when calculating recording time for these EEGs:

  • Recording time is when the recording is underway and the healthcare provider is collecting data.
  • Recording time excludes set-up and take-down time.

Other EEG codes, however, focus on the amount of physician time rather than recording time. Watch for that specificity in guidelines for 95961 (Functional cortical and subcortical mapping by stimulation and/or recording of electrodes or brain surface, or of depth electrodes, to provoke seizures or identify vital brain structures; initial hour of physician attendance) and +95962 (… each additional hour of physician attendance [List separately in addition to code for primary procedure). If the physician is in attendance for a total of 30 minutes or less, only report 95961 and append modifier 52 (Reduced services) to indicate he didn’t fulfill the full hour represented by the code.

Two codes for special EEG tests now specify who attends during the procedure:

  • 95953 -- Monitoring for localization of cerebral seizure focus by computerized portable 16 or more channel EEG, electroencephalographic (EEG) recording and interpretation, each 24 hours, unattended
  • 95956 -- Monitoring for localization of cerebral seizure focus by cable or radio, 16 or more channel telemetry, electroencephalographic (EEG) recording and interpretation, each 24 hours, attended by a technologist or nurse.

According to information on the...

Comments Off on Watch Changes to EEG, Joint Injection Guidelines
January 3, 2011
Coder's Cranium

Pay Attention To These Revised Codes for Colon Motility and Manometric Studies

If you’ve been looking for a code on colon motility study and being frustrated for the lack of it, your search is over. CPT 2011 debuts a new code for a manometric study, along with two revised codes for esophageal pH monitoring.

For gastroenterology, you have a lot of changes to sort through — many involving deletions on low use codes or clean-up work.

Here’s How to Use New Manometric Study Codes

You should pay attention on two new codes for a manometric study: 91117 (Colon motility [manometric] study, minimum 6 hours continuous recording [including provocation tests, e.g., meal, intracolonic balloon distension, pharmacologic agents, if performed], with interpretation and report), and 91013 (Esophageal motility [manometric study of the esophagus and/or gastroesophageal junction] study with interpretation and report; with stimulation or perfusion during 2-dimensional data study [e.g., stimulant, acid or alkali perfusion] [List separately in addition to code for primary procedure]).

CPT 91117 is just for the study itself, not for the same session with catheter placement. The radiologist may place the catheter in a prior procedure and the gastroenterologist may come in and out to supervise the testing and any provocations that are performed. Thus, you should include the provocations in the study and report 97117 only once no matter how many times the testing is done.

You can use 91013 in cases like assessment of the effect on the measured esophageal motility when the patient’s esophagus is exposed to different stimulant liquids, says Michael Weinstein, MD, a gastroenterologist in Washington, D.C., and former member of the AMA’s CPT Advisory Panel. The code also applies when intravenous medications are administered to try to produce symptoms. CPT 91010 is included in 91013 and would not be billed separately, he adds.

Use 91034, 91035 in a New Way

Aside from debuting...

Comments Off on Pay Attention To These Revised Codes for Colon Motility and Manometric Studies
December 16, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

Simplify Ear Coding With These Expert Tips

With more patients turning in for a variety of ear conditions, you cannot afford to lose any reimbursement. Look to our expert advice to ensure you’re coding correctly for all of the ear associated diagnoses.

1. Verify Documentation for E/M With 69210

Cerumen removal can present several coding challenges for your practice, particularly if the physician performs the service as a gateway to visualize the ear. Knowing when you can report 69210 (Removal impacted cerumen [separate procedure], 1 or both ears) is key to collecting for this service.

Example: Suppose a patient presents with ear pain, but the physician has to remove impacted cerumen before he can visualize the tympanic membrane. He subsequently diagnoses an ear infection. Your practice wants to bill an office visit and modifier along with 69210 – is that acceptable?

Key: “Whether to report 69210 is always a value judgment because if you just flick a little wax aside to visualize the eardrum, you shouldn’t bill for cerumen removal,” says Charles Scott, MD, FAAP, with Advocare Medford Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine in New Jersey. “Typically, I’ll use that code if I have to use a special device that allows me to curette the ear before I can visualize the tympanic membrane,” he advises.

The July 2005 CPT Assistant states that cerumen is considered “impacted” in several circumstances, one of which is, “cerumen impairs exam of clinically significant portions of the external auditory canal, tympanic membrane, or middle ear condition.” Therefore, if the cerumen is blocking the physician’s view and he has to use special instrumentation to remove it above and beyond irrigation, most payers allow you to report 69210.

You should ensure that you have separate documentation of the E/M service and procedure to support reporting both codes. Some practices overuse 69210, which means many...

Comments Off on Simplify Ear Coding With These Expert Tips
December 15, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

Switch From 92135 to New Location Based SCODI Codes

 These terms nail down your diabetic retinopathy imaging code choice.

In CPT® 2011 in the place of your old familiar SCODI code, you’ll find three area specific codes. Check out these tips on finding the correct code for imaging as well as DR services.

Code 92135 is being split into three more specific codes. The scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging or SCODI code got used a lot in 2010 and was a high volume code. CPT 2011 deletes the code. Pick the new code based on the particular area the imaging is performed on as follows:

Area CPT 2011 Code Descriptor
Front of the eye 92132 Scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging, anterior segment, with interpretation and report, unilateral or bilateral
Optic nerve 92133 Scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging, posterior segment, with interpretation and report, unilateral or bilateral; optic nerve
Retina 92134 Scanning computerized ophthalmic diagnostic imaging, posterior segment, with interpretation and report, unilateral or bilateral; retina

 

92227 Vs. 92228: Look at DR Status

Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness. Yet early detection makes the condition correctable 95 percent of the time. Imaging retina center technicians can easily look at a photo and read it. The ophthalmologist can then determine if the patient has DR, the stage it’s in, and the proper course of treatment.

Equate the term “Detection” that’s in new diabetic retinopathy imaging code 92227 (Remote imaging for detection of retinal diseases [e.g., retinopathy in a patient with diabetes] with analysis and report under physician supervision, unilateral or bilateral]) with “screening” for diabetic retinopathy. “Use this...

Comments Off on Switch From 92135 to New Location Based SCODI Codes
December 1, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

ICD-9 2011: 752.3x, V13, V91 Offer Obs More Anomaly, Status Options

Three scenarios show you where to brush up before Oct. 1 hits.

October 1 means it’s time to apply the new 2011 diagnosis codes affecting your obgyn practice, which include new uterine anomaly, placenta, and personal history diagnoses. Are you ready? Take this challenge to find out.

Add Uterine Anomalies to Your Diagnosis Arsenal

Scenario 1:

A) 752.31

B) 752.33

C) 752.35

D) None of the above.

E) All of the above.

Solution 1: E. The American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) identified seven types of uterine anomalies: agenesis, unicornuate, didelphus, bicornuate, septate, arcuate, and DES related anomalies. Of these, only didelphus and DES related anomalies have unique ICD-9 codes prior to Oct. 1: 752.2 and 760.76, respectively. For the other anomalies, you have no specific diagnosis recourse.

However, as of Oct. 1, you’ll be able to differentiate between these different types, and payers will translate these codes into specific gynecologic and obstetric implications and management. They are:

  • 752.31 – Agenesis of uterus
  • 752.32 - Hypoplasia of uterus
  • 752.33 – Unicornuate uterus
  • 752.34 – Bicornuate uterus
  • 752.35 – Septate uterus
  • 752.36 – Arcuate uterus
  • 752.39 — Other anomalies of uterus.

Multiple Placentae? Make Use of New Dx

Scenario 2: The ob-gyn delivers dichorionic/diamniotic twins vaginally. After October 1, how should you report this?

A) 59400, 59409-51, 651.01, V91.00, V27.2

B) 59400, 59409-51, 651.01, V91.01, V27.2

C) 59400, 59409-51, 651.01, V91.02, V27.2

D) 59400, 59409-51, 651.01, V91.03, V27.2

E) 59400, 59409-51, 651.01, V91.09, V27.2

Solution 2: D. You would report 59400 (Routine obstetric care including antepartum care, vaginal delivery [with or without episiotomy, and/or forceps] and postpartum care) for the first baby and 59409-51 (Vaginal delivery only [with or without episiotomy and/or forceps]; Multiple procedures) for the second. To support these CPT codes, you’d link each to 651.01 (Twin pregnancy; delivered) and...

Comments Off on ICD-9 2011: 752.3x, V13, V91 Offer Obs More Anomaly, Status Options
September 20, 2010
Provider News

92541 + 92544 Will Soon Be OK

AMA corrects vestibular test codes to allow partial reporting.

The Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) came down hard on practitioners who perform vestibular testing earlier this year, but a new correction, effective Oct. 1, should ease the restrictions and help the otolaryngology, neurology, and audiology practices that report these services.

The problem: CCI edits currently restrict practices from reporting 92541, 92542, 92544, and 92545 individually if three or less of the tests are performed, notes Debbie Abel, Au.D., director of reimbursement and practice compliance with the American Academy of Audiology.

The solution: Starting October 1, 2010, “if two or three of these codes are reported for the same date of service by the same provider for the same beneficiary, an NCCI-associated modifier may be utilized to bypass the NCCI edits,” CMS wrote in a decision to alter the edits.

The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) has requested “clarification regarding the correct NCCI-modifier to use when reporting the codes to Medicare,” noted Lemmietta G. McNeilly, PhD, CCC-SLP, CAE, chief staff officer of Speech-Language Pathology with ASHA, in a July 29 announcement.

Look for Changes to Vestibular Testing Descriptors

The root of the CCI problem began when the 2010 CPT manual was published, including new code 92540 (Basic vestibular evaluation …) and the subsequent codes following it, which make up the individual components of 92540. “The clarification that resulted in the NCCI edits being lifted should be included in upcoming versions of the manual,” Abel tells Part B Insider.

According to the AMA’s Errata page, code descriptors should read as follows, effective Oct. 1:

  • 92540 — Basic vestibular evaluation, includes spontaneous nystagmus test with eccentric gaze fixation nystagmus, with recording, positional nystagmus test, minimum of 4 positions, with recording, optokinetic nystagmus test, bidirectional foveal and peripheral stimulation, with recording, and

...

Comments Off on 92541 + 92544 Will Soon Be OK
August 25, 2010
Coding Challenge

Cyst Expression: I&D or Excision?

Question: Documentation reads, “The cyst was excised after performing a central incision directly on the cyst. All the material was expressed, then cyst capsule was removed completely and excised completely. Packing was performed.” Should I code the procedure as an I&D or an excision?

Supercoder.com/forum/

Answer: You should look at the pathology report and any further excision description to reach the correct code set. “Excision is defined as full thickness [through the dermis] removal of a lesion …,” according to CPT’s Excision-Benign Lesions guidelines. The documentation you provided does not indicate what tissue levels the excision involved. A cyst can be epidermal or sebaceous (706.2). A lesion that is removed from the epidermis (top skin layer) does not meet CPT’s excision definition.

The sebaceous gland extends through the dermis. Excision that deep would qualify for an excision code. An excision code (such as 11400, Excision, benign lesion including margins, except skin tag [unless listed elsewhere], trunk, arms or legs; excised diameter 0.5 cm or less) requires further documentation detailing the lesion’s morphology, size (including margins), and anatomical location. Without this information, the I&D code (10060, Incision and drainage of abscess [e.g., carbuncle, suppurative hidradenitis, cutaneous or subcutaneous abscess, cyst, furuncle, or paronychia]; simple or single) may be more appropriate. The physician made a cut to drain the cyst and then drained (expressed) all the material. The cyst capsule removal is part of the treatment of the I&D to prevent the blockage from reoccurring.

Take more coding challenges with Family Practice Coding Alert. Written by Jen Godreau, BA, CPC, CPEDC, content director of Supercoder.com, Family Practice Coding Alert, Volume 12, Number 6.

Comments Off on Cyst Expression: I&D or Excision?
August 12, 2010
CMS / Hot Coding Topics / ICD-10

Heads Up Coders: 2013 ICD-10 Implementation Date Is Firm

Plus: CMS has proposed freezing the ICD-9 codeset after next year.

If you were hoping that the Oct. 1, 2013 ICD-10 implementation date wasn’t set in stone, you are out of luck. That’s the word from CMS during a June 15 CMS Open Door Forum entitled “ICD-10 Implementation in a 5010 Environment.”

“There will be no delays on this implementation period, and no grace period,” said Pat Brooks, RHIA, with CMS’s Hospital and Ambulatory Policy Group, during the call. “A number of you have contacted us about rumors you’ve heard about postponement of that date or changes to that date, but I can assure you that that is a firm implementation date,” she stressed.

Brooks indicated that the rumor about a potential delay in the implementation date continues to persist throughout the physician community, and recommended that practice managers alert their physicians to the fact that that the rumor is untrue.

The Oct. 1, 2013 date will be in effect for both inpatient and outpatient services. Keep in mind that the ICD-10 implementation will have no impact on CPT and HCPCS coding, Brooks said. You will still continue to bill your CPT and HCPCS procedure codes as before.

You’ll Find Nearly 55,000 Additional Codes

Currently, CMS publishes about 14,000 ICD-9 codes, but there are over 69,000 ICD-10 codes. The additional codes will allow you to provide greater detail in describing diagnoses and procedures, Brooks said.

If you’re wondering which specific codes ICD-10 includes for your specialty, you can check out the entire 2010 ICD-10 codeset, which CMS has posted on its Web site. “Later this year, we’ll be posting the 2011 update,” Brooks said during the call.

@ For more details on CMS’ upcoming plans, subscribe to Part B Insider (Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC).

Sign...

Comments Off on Heads Up Coders: 2013 ICD-10 Implementation Date Is Firm
June 18, 2010