Hot Coding Topics

Simplify Ear Coding With These Expert Tips

With more patients turning in for a variety of ear conditions, you cannot afford to lose any reimbursement. Look to our expert advice to ensure you’re coding correctly for all of the ear associated diagnoses.

1. Verify Documentation for E/M With 69210

Cerumen removal can present several coding challenges for your practice, particularly if the physician performs the service as a gateway to visualize the ear. Knowing when you can report 69210 (Removal impacted cerumen [separate procedure], 1 or both ears) is key to collecting for this service.

Example: Suppose a patient presents with ear pain, but the physician has to remove impacted cerumen before he can visualize the tympanic membrane. He subsequently diagnoses an ear infection. Your practice wants to bill an office visit and modifier along with 69210 – is that acceptable?

Key: “Whether to report 69210 is always a value judgment because if you just flick a little wax aside to visualize the eardrum, you shouldn’t bill for cerumen removal,” says Charles Scott, MD, FAAP, with Advocare Medford Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine in New Jersey. “Typically, I’ll use that code if I have to use a special device that allows me to curette the ear before I can visualize the tympanic membrane,” he advises.

The July 2005 CPT Assistant states that cerumen is considered “impacted” in several circumstances, one of which is, “cerumen impairs exam of clinically significant portions of the external auditory canal, tympanic membrane, or middle ear condition.” Therefore, if the cerumen is blocking the physician’s view and he has to use special instrumentation to remove it above and beyond irrigation, most payers allow you to report 69210.

You should ensure that you have separate documentation of the E/M service and procedure to support reporting both codes. Some practices overuse 69210, which means many...

Comments Off on Simplify Ear Coding With These Expert Tips
December 15, 2010
pathology

238.2 Should Only Be Used in Medical Record Under 1 Condition

Eliminate ‘uncertain behavior’ confusion with expert tips

If you always use diagnosis code 238.2 (Neoplasm of uncertain behavior of skin) when you’re reporting 11100 (Biopsy of skin, subcutaneous tissue and/or mucous membrane [including simple closure], unless otherwise listed; single lesion) for a biopsy procedure your surgeon performs, you’re setting your practice up for disaster. The key to knowing when to use the “uncertain behavior” diagnosis code is understanding what that code descriptor really means. Follow these expert tips to ensure you’re choosing the correct diagnosis code for all your 11100 claims.

Wait For Pathology Before Choosing a Code

When your general surgeon performs a biopsy you should always wait until the pathology report comes back to choose the proper diagnosis and procedure codes to report – even though this will not always affect the CPT code you will wind up choosing.

Reason: The biopsy specimen’s pathology will affect the ICD-9 code you report, but most CPT procedure codes are not based on the specimen’s results. “There are a few CPT codes which are linked to specific diagnoses (for instance, excision of benign and malignant lesions), but overall CPT is about what you did; ICD-9 is about the outcome or the reason for it,” says Marcella Bucknam, CPC, CCS-P, CPC-H, CCS, CPC-P, COBGC, CCC, manager of compliance education for the University of Washington Physicians Compliance Program in Seattle.

Get to Know the Meaning Behind ‘Uncertain’ Codes

When you report 238.2 as the diagnosis for a biopsy procedure, you’re telling the payer that the pathologist said in his path report that he was uncertain as to the morphology of the lesion, says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CENTC, CPC-H, CPC-P, CPC-I, CHCC, president of CRN Healthcare Solutions, a coding and reimbursement consulting firm in Tinton Falls, N.J., and senior coder and auditor for...

Comments Off on 238.2 Should Only Be Used in Medical Record Under 1 Condition
September 20, 2010
Hot Coding Topics / modifier 25

Newborn Status Change Means Deciding Between Hospital Care Codes

Sort your normal, sick and intensive care options. Choosing the appropriate codes for initial newborn services can be difficult due to the large number of available codes and gray areas between the spectrum of illnesses. If you find yourself getting tripped up by the multiple categories, read on for expert tips and real-world examples that [...] Related articles:

  1. Must Hospital Admit Codes and Admission Show Same DOS? Overlook this rule, and risk leaving rightful E/M dollars on...
  2. Give Your Newborn Coding Skills a Checkup This directive stops the sending physician from committing an...
  3. Answers To Your Hospital Admission, Subsequent Care Coding Questions Revenue Booster: Here’s when you can claim a consult...

Comments Off on Newborn Status Change Means Deciding Between Hospital Care Codes
February 4, 2010
Audit / Hot Coding Topics / MAC / modifier 58 / modifier 78 / modifier 79

Global Billing: Document ‘Unrelated’ for Modifier 79 Services

MACs are looking for ‘red flags’ to halt additional global period pay Billing for additional services during a global surgery period is always tricky, but now you can expect special scrutiny for modifier 79 claims. After the OIG got wind of fraudulent surgery billing with modifier 79 (Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period), CMS contractors have been on the hunt [...] Related articles:

  1. These 8 Services Are Not Part Of The Global Surgical PackageIf you’re not reporting these services separately, you’re losing money....
  2. Modifier Cheat Sheet: Banish Your E/M Modifier Phobias ForeverOnce you have this tool, you’ll never again wonder which...
  3. Bone Up On ASC Orthopedic Coding With These Global Period, Modifier Tips 3 ways your physician claim better look different than...

Comments Off on Global Billing: Document ‘Unrelated’ for Modifier 79 Services
January 7, 2010