Coder's Cranium / General / Hot Coding Topics / Provider News

Stop Forfeiting Level Four and Five E/Ms With 3 PFSH Tips

Make your physician’s job easier by letting the patient or nurse document the history.

If your physician glosses over a patient’s past, family, and social history (PFSH), you may be missing out on up to $69 per E/M.  Accurately counting the number of PFSH items could result in more money for an encounter, because the top-level E/M codes require PFSH elements in addition to an extended history of present illness, and more than 1 system reviewed. Learn these three quick tips to ensure your physician is capturing, and you’re recognizing, every history component the patient mentions.

1. Determine the Level of PFSH

For coding purposes, the history portion of an E/M service requires all three elements — history of present illness (HPI), review of systems (ROS), and a past, family and social history (PFSH).  Therefore, the PFSH helps determine patient history level, which has a great effect on the E/M level you can report.  If you do not know the PFSH level, you may have to select a lower level of E/M service than might otherwise be warranted.  There are three levels of PFSH: none, pertinent, and complete, says Leah Gross, CPC, coding lead at Metro Urology in St. Paul, Minn.

Pertinent: To reach a detailed level of history for the encounter (in addition to an extended HPI and the review of 2-9 systems), you need a pertinent PFSH.  According to Medicare’s Documentation Guidelines for E/M Services, you need at least one specific item from any of the three PFSH areas to achieve the pertinent level.  When the physician asks only about one history area related to the main problem, this is a pertinent PFSH.

Complete: To reach a comprehensive level of history for the encounter (in addition to an extended HPI and the...

Comments Off on Stop Forfeiting Level Four and Five E/Ms With 3 PFSH Tips
June 8, 2011
Medicare / Toolkit

Chiropractic Coding: Avoid This Common Documentation Mistake

Treatment plans are a must, experts say.

You’ve treated your chiropractic patient, you’ve selected the correct codes, and you’ve submitted your claim. All set, right? Not quite. Check out this common mistake that chiropractors make.

“Many chiropractors do not create written chiropractic treatment plans for every new patient,” says Marty Kotlar, DC, CHCC, CBCS, president of Target Coding, a chiropractic coding and billing consulting firm. Use this checklist to ensure you send Medicare the information CMS most wants to see included “with every new patient plan of care,” Kotlar says:

__ The history
__ Present illness
__ Family history
__ The past health history
__ The physical examination
__ The diagnosis
__ The plan — This should include:

  • Therapeutic modalities to effect cure or relief (patient education and exercise training)
  • The level of care that is recommended (the duration and frequency of visits)
  • Specific goals that are to be achieved with treatment
  • The objective measures that will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment
  • Date of initial treatment.

__ Signature/initials to authenticate the records.

@ Part B Insider (Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC).

Sign up for the upcoming live audio conference, Risk Management Strategies for Healthcare Providers, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Chiropractic Coding: Avoid This Common Documentation Mistake
June 8, 2010