Meaningful use expert Jim Tate has written that the Medicaid EHR incentive program reminds him of "zero entry" swimming pools: very easy to get into, with almost no barriers. Given…
If you’re receiving denials from Medicare, one possibility is that you’re running up against medically unlikely edits (MUEs). The edits, which are designed to prevent overpayments caused by gross billing errors, usually a result of clerical or billing systems’ mistakes, often confuse even veteran coders.
Ensure you’re not letting MUEs wreak havoc on your urology practice’s coding and reimbursement by uncovering the truth about four aspects of these edits.
While you shouldn’t stress too much, any practice filing a claim with Medicare should know what MUEs are and how they work.
“They limit the frequency a CPT code can be used,” says Chandra L. Hines, business office manager at Capital Urological Associates in Raleigh, N.C. “With our specialty of urology, we need to become aware of the denials and not let every denial go because the insurance company said it was an MUE. We should all be aware of MUEs as they occur, and we cannot always control whether or not we will receive payment.”
The MUE list includes specific CPT or HCPCS codes, followed by the number of units that CMS will pay. CMS developed the MUEs to reduce paid claims error rates in the Medicare Program, says Jillian Harrington, MHA, CPC, CPC-P, CPCI, CCS-P, president of ComplyCode in Binghamton, New York. “The first edits were implemented in January 2007, although the edits themselves became public in October 2008,” she adds.
Some MUEs deal with anatomical impossibilities while others edit automatically the number of units of service you can bill for a service in any 24-hour period. Still others limit codes according to CMS policy. For example, excision of a hydrocele, bilateral (55041) has a bilateral indicator of “2,” so you should never bill two or more units of this code. Additional edits focus on the nature of...
CMS clears up flu shot coding confusion.
You’ve heard the advantages of participating in CMS’s Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program (including $44,000 per-physician bonus incentives over a five-year period), but you may not be sure how to enroll.
CMS staffers cleared up that confusion during an Oct. 5 open door forum, where CMS’s Rachel Maisler indicated that you must register on CMS’s EHR incentive program’s Web site, which will open in January 2011 for the Medicare program.
In addition, you must be enrolled in CMS’s PECOS system and have an NPI, and you must use certified EHR technology. You can find details on how to determine which EHR systems are certified on www.healthit.hhs.gov.
Key dates: During the call, CMS reps also announced important dates involved in EHR participation. “Attestation, which is how you will report the objectives and measures for meaningful use and clinical quality measures, will begin in April of 2011, and we expect the first payments will be made in May of 2011,” Maisler said.
Look for Combined Flu Shot
Flu vaccine: Now that the H1N1 immunization is part of the regular flu vaccine, a caller asked the CMS officials whether a new code will be developed to describe the combined flu shot, but CMS officials noted that no such code will be issued.
“We’re continuing to use the same codes as last year, and my understanding is the H1N1 is part of the regular flu vaccine this year, so you’d bill what the appropriate flu vaccine code is,” said CMS’s Amy Bassano, during the call. High-dose flu vaccine code 90662 (Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, preservative free, enhanced immunogenicity via increased antigen content, for intramuscular use) has been added to the roster of codes that can be billed to Medicare, Bassano confirmed.
RACs: Another caller...
Medically unlikely edits ignorance could be causing you medical coding claim denials.
Ensure you’re not letting medically unlikely edits (MUEs) wreak havoc on your urology practice’s coding and reimbursement by uncovering the truth about four aspects of these edits.
Myth 1: MUE Edits Don’t Affect Your Practice
Some practices feel that they don’t need to worry about MUEs.
Reality: “They limit the frequency a CPT code can be used,” says Chandra L. Hines, business office manager at Capital Urological Associates in Raleigh, N.C. “With our specialty of urology, we need to become aware of the denials and not let every denial go because the insurance company said it was an MUE. We should all be aware of MUEs as they occur, and we cannot always control whether or not we will receive payment.”
The MUE list includes specific CPT or HCPCS codes, followed by the number of units that CMS will pay. CMS developed the MUEs to reduce paid claims error rates in the Medicare Program. The first edits were implemented in January 2007, although some of the edits themselves became public in October 2008.
Some MUEs deal with anatomical impossibilities while others edit automatically the number of units of service you can bill for a service in any 24-hour period. Still others limit codes according to CMS policy. For example, excision of a hydrocele, bilateral (55041) has a bilateral indicator of “2,” so you should never bill two or more units of this code. Additional edits focus on the nature of the equipment for testing, the study or procedure, or pathology specimen.
Anatomical example: The MUEs edit out and deny an erroneously coded claim for a circumcision (54161, Circumcision, surgical excision other than clamp, device or dorsal slit; older than 28 days of age) for a patient...
Bonus: Effective immediately! You’re probably accustomed to CMS taking away coverage for certain services, but in an early holiday gift to practices, CMS has actually added a preventive care service to its roster of covered screenings, effective immediately. CMS issued a final decision on Dec. 8 declaring that HIV testing will now be covered for Medicare beneficiaries [...] Related articles:
Report reveals what he and his billing staff did right. Does your practice have the right stuff? Turns out the old saying is true: If you haven’t done anything wrong, an OIG audit is nothing to worry about. A New York cardiologist who collected over $1.3 million over a three-year period for 5,061 claims caught the OIG’s [...] Related articles: