Hot Coding Topics

ICD-9 2011: 752.3x, V13, V91 Offer Obs More Anomaly, Status Options

Three scenarios show you where to brush up before Oct. 1 hits.

October 1 means it’s time to apply the new 2011 diagnosis codes affecting your obgyn practice, which include new uterine anomaly, placenta, and personal history diagnoses. Are you ready? Take this challenge to find out.

Add Uterine Anomalies to Your Diagnosis Arsenal

Scenario 1:

A) 752.31

B) 752.33

C) 752.35

D) None of the above.

E) All of the above.

Solution 1: E. The American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) identified seven types of uterine anomalies: agenesis, unicornuate, didelphus, bicornuate, septate, arcuate, and DES related anomalies. Of these, only didelphus and DES related anomalies have unique ICD-9 codes prior to Oct. 1: 752.2 and 760.76, respectively. For the other anomalies, you have no specific diagnosis recourse.

However, as of Oct. 1, you’ll be able to differentiate between these different types, and payers will translate these codes into specific gynecologic and obstetric implications and management. They are:

  • 752.31 – Agenesis of uterus
  • 752.32 - Hypoplasia of uterus
  • 752.33 – Unicornuate uterus
  • 752.34 – Bicornuate uterus
  • 752.35 – Septate uterus
  • 752.36 – Arcuate uterus
  • 752.39 — Other anomalies of uterus.

Multiple Placentae? Make Use of New Dx

Scenario 2: The ob-gyn delivers dichorionic/diamniotic twins vaginally. After October 1, how should you report this?

A) 59400, 59409-51, 651.01, V91.00, V27.2

B) 59400, 59409-51, 651.01, V91.01, V27.2

C) 59400, 59409-51, 651.01, V91.02, V27.2

D) 59400, 59409-51, 651.01, V91.03, V27.2

E) 59400, 59409-51, 651.01, V91.09, V27.2

Solution 2: D. You would report 59400 (Routine obstetric care including antepartum care, vaginal delivery [with or without episiotomy, and/or forceps] and postpartum care) for the first baby and 59409-51 (Vaginal delivery only [with or without episiotomy and/or forceps]; Multiple procedures) for the second. To support these CPT codes, you’d link each to 651.01 (Twin pregnancy; delivered) and...

Comments Off on ICD-9 2011: 752.3x, V13, V91 Offer Obs More Anomaly, Status Options
September 20, 2010
Hot Coding Topics

ICD-9 2011 Diagnosis Coding: New Ectasia Codes Come Oct. 1

Check out V13.65 for corrected congenital heart malformations.

Each October you’re faced with new ICD-9 codes to add to your diagnosis arsenal. 2011 is no exception, with new ectasia, congenital malformation, and body mass index (BMI) codes you’ll need to learn. Take a look at the proposed changes that will affect your cardiology practice, so that you’re ready when fall rolls around.

End Your Ectasia Hunt at 447.7x

The proposed changes to ICD-9 2011 add four codes specific to aortic ectasia, which could be among the most significant changes for cardiology coders.

“Ectasia” means dilation or enlargement, and aortic ectasia often refers to an enlargement that is milder than an aneurysm. But ICD-9 2010 does not distinguish ectasia from aneurysm, linking aortic ectasia to 441.9 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site without mention of rupture) and 441.5 (Aortic aneurysm of unspecified site, ruptured).

The proposed 2011 codes are specific to aortic ectasia and are based on anatomic site:

  • 447.70 — Aortic ectasia, unspecified site
  • 447.71 — Thoracic aortic ectasia
  • 447.72 — Abdominal aortic ectasia
  • 447.73 — Thoracoabdominal aortic ectasia.

New Corrected Congenital Malformations Code

A number of new codes deal with congenital malformations of the heart and circulatory system. Code V13.65 (Personal history of [corrected] congenital malformations of heart and circulatory system) will be “very useful to our practice,” says Janel C. Peterson, CPC, with Alegent Health Clinic Heart and Vascular Specialists in Omaha, Neb.

Add BMI V Codes to Your E/M Arsenal

The ICD-9 proposal has “expanded the body mass index (BMI) codes to demonstrate higher BMIs with five new codes,” notes Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CPC-H, CPC-P, CENTC, CHCC, with CRN Healthcare Solutions in Tinton Falls, N.J.

You’ll need to stop using V85.4 (Body Mass Index 40 and over, adult) on Oct. 1 and start...

Comments Off on ICD-9 2011 Diagnosis Coding: New Ectasia Codes Come Oct. 1
August 12, 2010
Anesthesiologist / Coding Challenge

Anesthesia Coding: Find the Missing EGD Reimbursement Link

Warning: Just including EGD diagnosis with your claim doesn’t guarantee reimbursement — here’s help.

Question: Our anesthesiologist provided anesthesia during an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) procedure, at the request of the attending physician. We coded the anesthesia portion with 00810. A note in the documentation mentions the request was due to the patient’s symptoms, but no other details were provided. The claim we submitted was denied, but we followed all of the other guidelines provided by the payer, including proof that the anesthesiologist administered Propofol. What did we do wrong?

Answer: One key to the denial might be found in the lack of coding for the patient’s condition. Your diagnosis code should indicate the co-existing medical condition that justifies your anesthesiologist’s involvement in the case, not the gastrointestinal condition leading to the endoscopy.

You may want to consult with your anesthesiologist to verify that the patient had a condition such as:

  • Parkinson’s disease (332.0)
  • Heart conditions (such as 410.xx, Acute myocardial infarction or 427.41, Ventricular fibrillation)
  • Mental retardation (318.x)
  • Seizure disorders (such as 780.39, Other convulsions)
  • Anxiety (such as 300.0x, Anxiety states)
  • Pregnancy
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse.

These are just some of the conditions that payers may require to justify the presence of an anesthesiologist at a colonoscopy. ICD-9 2010 also has two codes to describe failed sedation attempts: 995.24 (Failed moderate sedation during procedure) and V15.80 (Personal history of failed moderate sedation).

If your anesthesiologist’s documentation confirms one of these conditions, 995.24 or V15.80 would also justify an anesthesiologist’s involvement to most payers. The conditions listed above constitute the medical necessity of anesthesia with the procedure. If you used a screening diagnosis or treatment of commonly found conditions instead of the clinical condition requiring anesthesia, payers will not pay you for these services.

Also note the...

Comments Off on Anesthesia Coding: Find the Missing EGD Reimbursement Link
June 7, 2010
Anesthesia / Hot Coding Topics / ICD-9 / MAC

Unlock Pay With Anesthesia V Code Advice

Don’t be caught asleep: Patient history is one element of proper Dx coding.

Many coders hesitate to report V codes, or simply use them incorrectly, but sometimes this section of ICD-9 most accurately describes the reason for the patient’s condition....

Comments Off on Unlock Pay With Anesthesia V Code Advice
May 6, 2010
Coding Challenge

Neurosurgery Coding: Previous Injury Means Multiple Dx Options

Find out what additional information V codes provide to the payer. Question: We have a patient with previous spinal injury that is now causing neck pain. How should I code the diagnosis? North Carolina Subscriber Answer: Document and code prior conditions that contribute to a patient’s current complaint — if they affect the management of the current condition. Prior trauma, [...] Related articles:

  1. ICD-9 2010: More Coding Options for Brain Injury Check out V80.01 and V80.09 for special screenings. The...
  2. Dx Coding Moves That Stop Denials for Chronic Pain ClaimsTip: Code prior conditions in these cases. Imagine your pain...
  3. How Do I Code This Multiple Fracture Accident Patient?Question: A 30-year-old female presents to a rural ED with...

Comments Off on Neurosurgery Coding: Previous Injury Means Multiple Dx Options
February 15, 2010