CPT 2011: Pay Attention To These New Joint Injection Guidelines

Remember to check for updated or revised guidelines when preparing to use your new code books for 2011, not just code descriptors. CPT 2011 includes new details for coding some common injection procedures, as pointed out at the AMA’s CPT and RBRVS 2011 Annual Symposium in Chicago. Read on for a few pointers to help stay on the right track.

The introduction of new codes for paravertebral facet joint injections in 2010 (64490-64495) meant changes to how you reported related codes. During the CPT and RBRVS Symposium, Douglas G. Merrill, MD, MBA, of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, pointed out two revised guidelines dealing with paravertebral facet (spinal) joint procedures.

Instructions in CPT 2010 directed you to report 64999 (Unlisted procedure, nervous system) if the provider used ultrasound guidance during paravertebral facet joint injections. The AMA released a correction later in 2010, and the CPT 2011 clarifies the situation. If your provider used ultrasound guidance when administering paravertebral facet joint injections, report the appropriate code(s) from 0213T-0218T (Injection[s], diagnostic or therapeutic agent, paravertebral facet [zygapophyseal] joint [or nerves innervating that joint] with ultrasound guidance …).

T12-L1 change: CPT 2010 guidelines mandated that you report 64493 (Injection[s], diagnostic or therapeutic agent, paravertebral facet [zygapophyseal] joint [for nerves innervating that joint] with image guidance [fluoroscopy or CT], lumbar or sacral; single level) for an injection to the T12-L1 joint, or nerves innervating that joint. New 2011 guidelines direct you to submit 64490 (Injection[s], diagnostic or therapeutic agent, paravertebral facet [zygapophyseal] joint [for nerves innervating that joint] with image guidance [fluoroscopy or CT], cervical or thoracic; single) instead.

In addition, the 2011 guidelines direct providers to report paravertebral facet joint injections performed without image guidance with the appropriate trigger point injection code. Submit either 20552 or 20553 (Injection[s]; single or multiple trigger...

Comments Off on CPT 2011: Pay Attention To These New Joint Injection Guidelines

Watch Changes to EEG, Joint Injection Guidelines

You report several EEG codes such as 95812 (Electroencephalogram [EEG] extended monitoring; 41-60 minutes) and 95813 (… greater than 1 hour) based on the amount of recording time. But what constitutes recording time?

Jeffrey Cozzens, MD, professor and chair of the neurosurgery division of Southern Illinois University School of Medicine and a presenter at the AMA’s CPT and RBRVS 2011 Annual Symposium in Chicago, addressed the issue during his presentation about neurosurgery and neurology changes for 2011. Keep two things in mind when calculating recording time for these EEGs:

  • Recording time is when the recording is underway and the healthcare provider is collecting data.
  • Recording time excludes set-up and take-down time.

Other EEG codes, however, focus on the amount of physician time rather than recording time. Watch for that specificity in guidelines for 95961 (Functional cortical and subcortical mapping by stimulation and/or recording of electrodes or brain surface, or of depth electrodes, to provoke seizures or identify vital brain structures; initial hour of physician attendance) and +95962 (… each additional hour of physician attendance [List separately in addition to code for primary procedure). If the physician is in attendance for a total of 30 minutes or less, only report 95961 and append modifier 52 (Reduced services) to indicate he didn’t fulfill the full hour represented by the code.

Two codes for special EEG tests now specify who attends during the procedure:

  • 95953 -- Monitoring for localization of cerebral seizure focus by computerized portable 16 or more channel EEG, electroencephalographic (EEG) recording and interpretation, each 24 hours, unattended
  • 95956 -- Monitoring for localization of cerebral seizure focus by cable or radio, 16 or more channel telemetry, electroencephalographic (EEG) recording and interpretation, each 24 hours, attended by a technologist or nurse.

According to information on the...

Comments Off on Watch Changes to EEG, Joint Injection Guidelines

Neonatal Critical Care Coding: CPT 2010 Clarifies Resuscitation Guidance

Payers denying 99465-25? Here’s help straight from the AMA Symposium in Chicago. Question: There’s a notation in the CPT 2009 manual that the neonatal critical care codes include delivery room resuscitation. Is this true? Answer: No, a parenthetical note following 99465 (Delivery/birthing room resuscitation, provision of positive pressure ventilation and/or chest compressions in the presence of acute [...] Related articles:

  1. Bust 4 Myths About Pediatric Critical Care Services MYTHBUSTER: Codes 99291, +99292 apply to infants, young pediatric...
  2. Coding Critical Care? What You Can’t Bill SeparatelyAlthough there are some physician services you can report separately...
  3. Critical Care Coding Checklist Certain patient conditions could indicate 99291 service. Given the...

Comments Off on Neonatal Critical Care Coding: CPT 2010 Clarifies Resuscitation Guidance

CMS at AMA Chicago: We’re Reducing Consult Request Requirement

CMS auditors will look for 1 less thing in consult documentation. With Medicare’s invalidation of consultation codes 99241-99255 in 2010, your ICD-9 codes better prove why two MDs are necessary on the same patient’s hospital care or the physician better specify why in his note. Separate ICD-9 codes will help substantiate the medical necessity for providing consultative [...] Related articles:

  1. Medicare’s Consult Rule Trickle Down Effect And what it means for pediatric practices. A report...
  2. Medicare Changes to 2010 CPT Inpatient Consultation Codes Prevent 99251-99245 denials in 2010 with this checklist. Multiple...
  3. Medicare 2010 CPT Consultation Code ChangesNew rules for consult coding straight from the AMA Meeting...

Comments Off on CMS at AMA Chicago: We’re Reducing Consult Request Requirement

2010 Tumor Excision Coding: Lesion Vs. Chunk Size

Straight from the AMA in Chicago — answers to your lesion excision coding questions for 2010. Question: A thigh lesion measures 2 cm but requires a resection down to the subcutaneous layer of 4 cm. Which lesion excision code should I use? Answer: “You should use the larger of the subcutaneous codes,” says Albert E. Bothe, Jr, [...] Related articles:

  1. Lesion Excision Coding Challenge: 2 Lesions, 1 CutQuestion: Our nonphysician practitioner (NPP) discovers a pair of benign...
  2. Shave Duplicate Lesion Excision Denials Question: Our dermatologist shaved three epidermal lesions that the...
  3. Payer Update: NGS Directives Vs. Proper Skin Lesion CodingIgnore the LCD and stick with what you know about...

Comments Off on 2010 Tumor Excision Coding: Lesion Vs. Chunk Size