When ICD-9 to ICD-10 transition takes place in 2013, you will not always have an easy one-to-one relationship between old codes and the new codes. See how your ICD-9 codes will change in the following instances when the ICD-10 transition finally takes place.
Question: I’m unsure how to code for cannulation of colovesical fistula. The doctor also did a cystoscopy with bilateral retrogrades and bladder biopsies. How should I report this procedure? Answer: There is no specific CPT code for cannulation of th...
Here is what you should check in your physician’s documentation. As the conversion takes place from ICD-9 to ICD-10 in 2013, you will not be treating the codes in a way you always did. Often, you will have more options that may need tweaking the way ...
Level-four and level-five office visits are not unusual in a urology practice, but failing to incorrectly match the history, exam, and medical decision-making (MDM) can make you miss out on the higher level codes you could report.
The third element for the historical portion of an E/M service, after the chief complaint (CC) and the history of the present illness (HPI), is the review of systems (ROS) — this portion of the E/M service trips up many coders because often they must select a lower code simply because the provider didn’t document pertinent negative responses or inappropriately used the statement “all systems negative.”
Ensure you’re properly counting your urologist’s ROS with this primer to guarantee you’re not overcoding or undercoding his E/M services.
“The review of systems is a subjective account of a patient’s current and or past experiences with illnesses and or injuries affecting any of the 14 applicable organ systems,” explains Nicole Martin, CPC, manager of the medical practice management section of the Medical Society in New Jersey in Lawrenceville.
You’ll need to know the differences between the three ROS levels to determining the proper level of history and therefore, E/M code level:
A problem-pertinent ROS occurs when the urologist reviews a single system during the encounter, presumably the system directly related to the problem identified in the patient’s history of present illness (HPI). For a urology practice, “pertinent” refers to the genitourinary system, says Becky Boone, CPC, CUC, certified reimbursement assistant for the University of Missouri Department of Surgery in Columbia, which means the urologist reviews at least one item within the GU system.
A problem-pertinent ROS supports a level two new patient E/M service (99202) or a level three established patient E/M service (99213).
When the physician conducts an extended ROS, he should review a “limited”...
Question: My urologist performed a cystoscopy, transurethral incision of an orthotopic ureterocele, ureteroscopy, and a double J stent placement. I have drawn a blank on how to report the ureterocele incision. Here is the doctor’s note: “A 24 resec...
When your urologist fragments more than one stone located in two different locations within the urinary tract during one operative session, the proper coding might leave you scratching your head: Can you ever report both procedures? If you can, how do you sequence the codes? Tackle these tough questions by reviewing a sample scenario.
Your urologist performs a ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy of a left ureteral stone and lithotripsy of a bladder stone. How should you code these procedure performed during one operative session?
Separately Report Procedures Based on Anatomy
Depending on where the stones are in the urinary tract, you may be able to separately report and be paid for multiple fragmentation procedures during the same session. For a ureteroscopic fragmentation of a ureteral or renal pelvic stone your urologist performs, you’ll report 52353 (Cystourethroscopy, with ureteroscopy and/or pyeloscopy; with lithotripsy [ureteral catheterization is included]). Remember that 52353 applies to “any type of fragmentation, whether you use a Holmium laser, a Candela laser, a mechanical lithotripsy, or an ultrasonic lithotripter,” says Michael A. Ferragamo, MD, FACS, clinical assistant professor of urology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. If your urologist also fragments a bladder calculus during the same session, your coding will then depend on the different and separate anatomical location of the stones. Therefore, in the sample scenario, you can separately report those procedures. “We are dealing with two separate portions or parts of the urinary tract – a ureteral stone and a bladder stone,” Ferragamo explains.
According to the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI), codes 52317 (Litholapaxy: crushing or fragmentation of calculus by any means in bladder and removal of fragments; simple or small [less than 2.5 cm]) and 52318 (…complicated or large [over 2.5 cm]) are bundled with 52353. Because both bundles have a...
Version 16.3 of the National Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits initiated many new edit pairs on Oct. 1. You’ll need to get to know new edits affecting your small and large bowl injury repairs, open ureterotomy stentings, and diagnostic laparoscopy coding.
Count Bowl, Splenic Injury Repairs With Main Surgery
If your urologist has to perform a small or large bowl repair for an intestinal injury that occurs during an open urological or urogynecological procedure, you’ll likely be facing a new CCI edit dilemma.
CCI bundles column 2 codes 44602 (Suture of small intestine [enterorrhaphy] for perforated ulcer, diverticulum, wound, injury or rupture; single perforation), 44603 (… multiple perforations), 44604 (Suture of large intestine [colorrhaphy] for perforated ulcer, diverticulum, wound, injury or rupture [single or multiple perforations]; without colostomy), and 44605 (… with colostomy) into many of the procedures in the 50010-57280 range.
Silver lining: These edits have a modifier indicator of “1,” which means you can bypass the edits in some clinical circumstances, using a modifier such as 59 (Distinct procedural service). “These bundles indicate that a repair of an inadvertent small or large bowl injury occurring during urological or urogynecological surgery will be included in the primary procedure under most circumstances and should not be billed separately,” says Michael A. Ferragamo, MD, FACS, clinical assistant professor of urology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. “If such an injury does occur and is repaired, the surgeon should check CCI, version 16.3 edits to determine if their primary procedure is involved in these edits.”
If, during a urological procedure such as a difficult left nephrectomy, an inadvertent splenic injury occurs, resulting in an open splenectomy (38100, Splenectomy; total [separate procedure]), a partial splenectomy (38101, … partial [separate procedure]), or a laparoscopic splenectomy (38120, Laparoscopy, surgical, splenectomy)...
Modifier 59 sometimes will rescue your reimbursement.
Just when you’re finally getting a handle on all the 2010 coding changes, here comes round two of the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits. Version 16.1, which took effect April 1, will tie your hands when coding many common urology procedures, including prostate biopsies and urethral dilations.
Heads up: CCI 16.1 includes 2,054 new active pairs and 1,947 modifier changes, says Frank D. Cohen, MPA, MBB, senior analyst with MIT Solutions Inc. in Clearwater, Fla.
“For urology, there will be 78 edit pair additions and two edit pair deletions,” says Michael A. Ferragamo, MD, FACS, clinical assistant professor of urology at the State University of New York at Stony Brook.To ensure you get paid appropriately for your urologist’s services this quarter, here’s the rundown of the most important changes.
Say Goodbye to Biopsy with Several Prostate Procedures
You can no longer report prostate biopsy codes 55700 (Biopsy, prostate; needle or punch, single or multiple, any approach) or 55706 (Biopsies, prostate, needle, transperineal, stereotactic template guided saturation sampling, including imaging guidance) with 52630 (Transurethral resection; residual or re-growth of obstructive prostate tissue including control of postoperative bleeding, complete [vasectomy, meatotomy, cystourethroscopy, urethral calibration and/or dilation, and internal urethrotomy are included]). Your payer will reimburse you for 52630 but deny the biopsy codes, and you cannot use a modifier to separate these new edits.
“I have a major issue with the bundling of 55700 and 52630,” laments Alice Kater, CPC, PCS, coder for Urology Associates of South Bend, Ind. Kater says her urologists perform a good number of prostate biopsies transrectally and 55700 is what she uses because the descriptor says “any approach.” When you are performing two separate procedures utilizing two different approaches, how can they be bundled?”
Silver lining: CCI also bundles...
Be careful — the similarity to a laser procedure may deceive you.
Question: My urologist is performing a new procedure called a “button TURP.” I thought 52601 or 53852 might be correct, but now I’m thinking an unlisted procedure code may be more appropriate. What code should I use for this procedure?
California Subscriber
Answer: You should report 52601 (Transurethral electrosurgical resection of prostate, including control of postoperative bleeding, complete [vasectomy, meatotomy, cystourethroscopy, urethral calibration and/or dilation, and internal urethrotomy are included]) for the button transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) procedure.
Why: The button TURP is a bipolar...
Anesthesia, patient well-being can clue you in to the best modifier choice.
When your urologist ends a procedure early, you know you need to append a modifier to the procedure code, but the challenge is deciding between modifier 52 or...
The answer hinges on the urologist’s interpretation.
Question: A patient had a robotic prostatectomy for prostate cancer on Jan. 1. Then the patient started experiencing voiding problems in February. At that time my doctor did a cystoscopy to check for...
Knowing how to use add-on codes can net you up to $258 in additional reimbursement.
CPT is full of “add-on” codes, additions to minor and major surgical procedures as well as to E/M services. Fortunately for urology there are not…
Attach your procedure notes and the OIG’s report to pack extra punch.
Even if you follow all of CMS’s rules in reporting modifier 25 (Significant, separately identifiable evaluation and management service by the same physician on the same day of the…
Differentiating between GV and GW is your first step. If your urologist sees and treats hospice patients, you probably feel like you have to jump through hoops to get paid. The key to bringing in every hospice-related dollar your urologist deserves is ensuring you append the right modifier. Base Modifier GV or GW Choice on Diagnosis When reporting [...] Related articles:
Knowing the differences between the tests is your key to proper code choice. When your urologist says he performed urodynamics tests, you need to dig deeper into his documentation for clues about which code to report. Tack this overview up by your computer to help you quickly choose the right code every time. • In a simple [...] Related articles:
Question: Could you please give me the most current coding guidelines for the MESA and TESA procedures? The last I was aware, we were to use unlisted procedure codes. Is that still correct? Answer: You should still use unlisted procedure codes to report microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) and testicular sperm aspiration (TESA, sometimes called TESE [...] Related articles: