Primary vs. Secondary Diagnosis

Question: Many of our ophthalmology patients claim general reasons for their visit, such as “I can’t see well,” or “My vision is foggy.” We code these visits with 368.8 as the primary diagnosis because this is the primary reason for the visit. Any other problems or underlying causes of the blurry vision we report as secondary diagnoses. Is 368.8 the most appropriate code to use in these situations, and should we list it first?

Answer: You should only report 368.8 (Other specified visual disturbances) as a primary diagnosis code when the ophthalmologist doesn’t find a more definitive diagnosis during the course of the visit.

Carriers often consider a visit for blurred vision the same thing as a routine exam and Medicare will not pay for this service.

Primary vs. secondary: Whenever possible, you should list a more definitive diagnosis as primary and then the patient’s complaint of blurred vision as secondary. For example, if the ophthalmologist discovers that a cataract is causing the patient’s blurry vision, you would first list 366.12 (Incipient cataract) and then 368.8. You should always strive to report the most descriptive and accurate ICD-9 codes possible. If a patient claims her only reason for the visit is a routine exam, experts recommend that the ophthalmologist ask her a series of detailed questions to uncover any other complaints she may have but doesn’t think of right away. In obtaining a comprehensive history when a patient denies any blurriness of vision, the ophthalmologist should also ask, “Do your eyes chronically itch, burn, or water?” This may lead you to report dry eye syndrome (375.15, Tear film insufficiency, unspecified) or allergic conjunctivitis (372.14, Other chronic allergic conjunctivitis).

Do this: Rather than ask if a patient’s vision is blurry, ask if there is...

Comments Off on Primary vs. Secondary Diagnosis

Migraine ICD-9 Codes: How Do I Get My 5th Digits Right?

Discover what the 5th digit represents and why you need it on your claim. Question: A presents to the ED with complaints of a headache that’s worsening daily. He is experiencing visual blurring and nausea but no vomiting. This is the third headache of this nature in three weeks, and it has lasted “four or five [...] Related articles:

  1. Ahhhhh: Relief for Your Migraine ICD-9 Coding Headaches Don’t let migraines’ five subcategories and 30 codes suck...
  2. Should You Code Presenting Symptoms Along With Dx? Question: An established patient complains of trouble breathing and...
  3. Winter Laceration Repair: How Do I Code For Dermabond?Warning: Your coding will vary depending on who’s getting the...

Comments Off on Migraine ICD-9 Codes: How Do I Get My 5th Digits Right?

Ophthalmology Coding Challenge: Flashers & Floaters

How’s Your EO Coding & Billing? Test Yourself With This Scenario. Question: A patient reports flashes and floaters but the ophthalmologist does not find evidence of retinal pathology on routine ophthalmoscopy. Are we justified in billing for extended ophthalmoscopy (EO)? Answer: If the ophthalmoscopy is a routine part of a patient’s eye exam, do not [...] Related articles:

  1. Ophthalmology Coding: RT/LT or Modifier 50? Prevent Uni-Bi Reporting Errors With This Expert Insight Don’t...
  2. Ophthalmology Coding: GDX, VF, & Temp Plugs — How Many Modifiers?Question: A patient came in for a GDX and visual...
  3. Eye Surgery Coding Challenge: Denials for 15823 & 67904Question: I started receiving denials for 15823 and 67904. To...

Comments Off on Ophthalmology Coding Challenge: Flashers & Floaters