Coding Challenge

Cardio Coders: Discover Disconnect Date’s Proper Place

Tip: You need to know the hook-up date and disconnect day.

Question: Which date(s) of service should I report for 30-day cardiac event monitoring?

Washington Subscriber

Answer: For Noridian Medicare, your Part B administrator for Washington, you’ll need to know both (1) the date the staff hooked up the patient and (2) the day they disconnected the patient. But knowing which dates to report is only half the battle — you also need to know where to report them.

When you’re reporting 30-day cardiac event monitoring, Noridian requires providers to report the hook-up date as the “from” date and the disconnect date as the “through” date in Item 19 of the CMS-1500 (or its electronic equivalent).

Watch out: You should report only the “from” date (that is, the hook-up date) in Item 24A (or its electronic equivalent), Noridian instructs. You should not report the “through” (disconnect) date in 24A because if you have dates spanning two months and only a single unit, “the system inappropriately suspends the claim and asks the provider for clarification,” Noridian states.

The codes for 30-day monitoring include 93268-93272 (Wearable patient activated electrocardiographic rhythm derived event recording with presymptom memory loop, 24-hour attended monitoring, per 30 day period of time …) and 93012-93014 (Telephonic transmission of post-symptom electrocardiogram rhythm strip[s], 24-hour attended monitoring, per 30 day period of time).

Or if the “monitoring service meets the definition of the new 30-day cardiovascular telemetry service,” look to 93228-93229 (Wearable mobile cardiovascular telemetry with electrocardiographic recording, concurrent computerized real time data analysis and greater than 24 hours of accessible ECG data storage [retrievable with query] with ECG triggered and patient selected events transmitted to a remote attended surveillance center for up to 30 days …), Noridian states.

Learn more: You can read more from...

Comments Off on Cardio Coders: Discover Disconnect Date’s Proper Place
May 25, 2010
Audit / CMS / Oig / RAC / Toolkit

Recovery Audit Contractors: Know These RAC Fast Facts

RACs are just another tool in the government’s arsenal to collect improper payments.

You’ve got so many compliance acronyms flying at you every day that you may not be able to differentiate your RAC from the OIG. Know these quick facts about RACs to stay better informed.

  • Recovery audit contractors (RACs) detect and correct past improper payments so CMS and the MACs can prevent such problems in the future
  • RACs are hired as contractors by the government, and they can can collect “contingency fees,” which means that they get a percentage of the amount that they recover from providers who were paid inappropriately The maximum RAC lookback period is three years, and they cannot review claims paid prior to Oct. 1, 2007
  • Between 2005 and 2008, RACs involved in the original demonstration project recovered over $1.03 billion in Medicare improper payments, but referred only two cases of potential fraud to CMS, according to a February OIG report on the topic, which noted that “because RACs do not receive their contingency fees for cases they refer that are determined to be fraud, there may be a disincentive for RACs to refer potential cases of fraud.”
  • Unlike RACs, the OIG is a government entity. Although the OIG also performs reviews and audits and seeks improper payments, the OIG does not collect contingency fees.

For more on the RAC program, visit www.cms.gov/rac.

@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming live Webinar, You Can Use the Appeals Process Like a Pro, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Recovery Audit Contractors: Know These RAC Fast Facts
May 24, 2010
Medicare / Oig / Provider News

Cost of Freezing Conversion Factor is Over $6 Billion — Just for 2010

Plus: The OIG recovered over $1.5 billion in fiscal year 2009, and is on the lookout to collect more.

With less than two weeks to go before Medicare payments once again threaten to decrease by 21 percent, a new report sheds light on the financial outcome of Congressional actions.

Although the 2010 Physician Fee Schedule originally included a conversion factor that would have been 21 percent lower than the 2009 level, practices haven’t felt that cut yet this year,because legislators have voted several times to freeze payments, which now use the conversion factor of $36.0791. That freeze will expire on May 31, after which your Medicare payments will drop considerably unless Congress steps in once more.

However, one government entity’s calculations show that the freeze is costly. According to a May 7 Congressional Budget Office report, freezing payments at the current levels for the rest of 2010 would cost the government… … $6.5 billion. The AMA has turned up the heat on Congress to replace the current payment method, releasing a print ad aimed at Congress to demonstrate that “more delays of permanent reform now increase the cost for taxpayers,” and that the association “calls on Congress to fix the flawed Medicare physician payment formula now.”

Congress has not yet introduced a bill to extend the payment freeze past May 31. Keep an eye on the Insider for more information as this story develops.

To read the Congressional Budget Office’s calculation sheet,visit www.cbo.gov/budget/factsheets/2010b/SGR-menu.pdf.

@ Part B Insider. Editor: Torrey Kim, CPC

Sign up for the upcoming on-demand Webinar, 5 Steps to Optimize Your Office’s Coding & Billing Practices, or order the CD/transcripts.

Be a hero. Sign up for Supercoder.com, and join the coding community at the Supercoder.com Facebook Fan Page.

Comments Off on Cost of Freezing Conversion Factor is Over $6 Billion — Just for 2010
May 24, 2010
Audit / Provider News

Auditors Review Your Notes Based on the Regs as of the Service Date

auditorIf you performed a consult in 2006, the auditor will use 2006 guidelines — not today’s rules.

Most Part B practices have grown accustomed to tucking consult regulations into the backs of their minds, since Medicare no longer pays for...

Comments Off on Auditors Review Your Notes Based on the Regs as of the Service Date
May 12, 2010
Medicare / Toolkit

Recognize a Write-Off in 6 Steps

Save this option for when other collection methods have failed.

You’ve offered discounts, payment plans, and more,but you still haven’t received payment from a patient. You may be forced to do a write-off at this point, says Steve Verno, CMMC,...

Comments Off on Recognize a Write-Off in 6 Steps
May 9, 2010
Coding Challenge / E/M / modifier 90

Medical Coders: Use 36415 for Lab Draws

You have two options depending on the next step.

Question: Our vascular office performs blooddraws and analysis for a local hospital. Can we bill for a lab draw in an office setting, and if so, what codes should we use?...

Comments Off on Medical Coders: Use 36415 for Lab Draws
May 5, 2010
Coding Challenge / Medicare / modifier

Append Modifier Q6 for Fill-In Physician

Before using modifier Q6 for a non-Medicare patient, check with the commercial payer — here’s why.

Question: We hired a locum tenens for two weeks. Do we code the same for the replacement physician as for a full-time...

Comments Off on Append Modifier Q6 for Fill-In Physician
May 2, 2010
Coding Challenge / CPT / Medicare

Tune in to Video-Conference Cat. III Code

Here’s what you need to explain in your cover letter.
Question: Our doctor has agreed to be a specialty resource for a small rural hospital. She recently provided critical care services for an ER patient with acute seizures

...

Comments Off on Tune in to Video-Conference Cat. III Code
April 30, 2010
Coding Challenge / E/M / radiology

Radiology Medical Coders – Tighten Up Your LAP-BAND Coding

If your radiologist performs adjustments during the bariatric surgery’s global period, do this.

Question: Our radiologists perform percutaneous LAP-BAND adjustments. We report S2083 for the service and 77002 for the fluoroscopy. Is this the correct fluoroscopy code?

Connecticut Subscriber

Answer:...

Comments Off on Radiology Medical Coders – Tighten Up Your LAP-BAND Coding
April 26, 2010
CMS / MAC / Provider News

Congress Puts Off 21 Percent Pay Cut Until May

But because legislators missed the cutoff by one day, some claims were processed using a lower rate.

Although the government appeared poised to take a big bite out of your next Part B payments, you have another month before...

Comments Off on Congress Puts Off 21 Percent Pay Cut Until May
April 18, 2010